Skip to main content

Reducing the Effects of Gender Stereotypes on Performance Evaluations

Abstract

The purpose of this research was to extend previous work on gender bias in performance evaluation. Specifically, we examined whether a structured free recall intervention could decrease the influence of traditional gender-stereotypes on the performance evaluations of women. Two hundred and forty-seven college students provided performance ratings for vignettes that described the performance of male or female college professors. Results indicated that without the intervention, raters who have traditional stereotypes evaluated women less accurately and more negatively. Conversely, the structured free recall intervention successfully eliminated these effects. The usefulness of the structured free recall intervention as a tool for decreasing the influence of gender stereotypes on performance ratings is discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

REFERENCES

  • Arvey, R. D. (1979). Unfair discrimination in the employment interview: Legal and psychological aspects. Psychological Bulletin, 86 736-765.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baltes, B. B., & Parker, C. P. (2000a). Clarifying the role of memory in the performance cue effect. Journal of Business and Psychology, 15 229-246.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baltes, B. B., & Parker, C. P. (2000b). Reducing the effects of performance expectations on behavioral ratings. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 82 237-267.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bem, S. L. (1981). Gender schema theory: A cognitive account of sex typing. Psychological Review, 88 354-364.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bodenhausen, G. B., & Macrae, C. M. (1996). The self-regulation of intergroup perception: Mechanisms and consequences of stereotype suppression. In C. M. Macrae, C. Stangor, & M. Hewstone (Eds.), Stereotypes and stereotyping (pp. 227-253). New York: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cacioppo, J. T., & Petty, R. E. (1982). The need for cognition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42 116-131.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cardy, R. L., & Kehoe, J. F. (1984). Rater selective attention ability and appraisal effectiveness: The effect of cognitive style on the accuracy of differentiation among ratees. Journal of Applied Psychology, 69 589-594.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cleveland, J. N., Stockdale, M., & Murphy, K. R. (2000). Women and men in organizations: Sex and gender issues at work. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cronbach, J. L. (1955). Processes affecting scores on understanding of others and "assumed similarity." Psychological Bulletin, 52 177-193.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davison, H. K., & Burke, M. J. (2000). Sex discrimination in simulated employment contexts: A meta-analytic investigation. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 56 225-248.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deaux, K., & Taynor, J. (1973). Evaluation of male and female ability: Bias works two ways. Psychological Reports, 32 261-262.

    Google Scholar 

  • Del Boca, F. K., & Ashmore, R. D. (1980). Sex stereotypes and implicit personality theory. II. A trait-inference approach to the assessment of sex stereotypes. Sex Roles, 6 519-535.

    Google Scholar 

  • Del Boca, F. K., Ashmore, R. D., & McManus, M. A. (1986). Gender-related attitudes. In R. D. Ashmore & F. K. Del Boca (Eds.), The social psychology of female-male relations: A critical analysis of central concepts (pp. 121-163). Orlando, FL: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeNisi, A., Cafferty, T., & Meglino, B. (1984). A cognitive view of the performance appraisal process: A model and some research propositions. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 33 360-396.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dobbins, G. H., Cardy, R. L., & Truxillo, D. M. (1988). The effects of purpose of appraisal and individual differences in stereotypes of women on sex differences in performance ratings: A laboratory and field study. Journal of Applied Psychology, 73 551-558.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feldman, J. M., & Lynch, J. G. (1988). Self-generated validity and other effects of measurement on belief, attitude, intention, and behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 73 421-435.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, attitude, intention, and behavior: An introduction to theory and research. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fiske, S. T. (1991). Social science research on trial: Use of sex stereotyping research in Price Waterhouse v. Hopkins. American Psychologist, 46 1049-1060.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fiske, S. T. (1998). Stereotyping, prejudice, and discrimination. In. D. T. Gilbert, S. T. Fiske, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (pp. 357-411). Cambridge, MA: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fiske, S. T., & Neuberg, S. L. (1990). A continuum model of impression formation: From category-based to individuating processes as a function of information, motivation, and attention. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental psychology (Vol. 23, pp. 1-108). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Furnham, A., & Duignan, S. (1989). The selective recall of attitude consistent information: A study concerning sex differences. Psychologia, 32 112-119.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glick, P., Zion, C., & Neslon, C. (1988). What mediates sex discrimination in hiring decisions? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55 178-186.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldberg, P. A. (1968). Are women prejudiced against women? Transactions, 5 28-30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gordon, M. E., Slade, L. A., & Schmitt, N. (1986). The “Science of the Sophomore” revisited: From conjecture to empiricism. Academy of Management Review, 11 191-207.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gunderson, D. E., Tinsley, D. B., & Terpstra, D. E. (1996). Empirical assessment of impression management bias: The potential for performance appraisal error. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 11 57-76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gutek, B. A., Cohen, A., & Tsui, A. (1996). Reactions to perceived sex discrimination. Human Relations, 49 791-813.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamner, W. C., Kim, J. S., Baird, L., & Bigoness, W. J. (1974). Race and sex as determinants of ratings by potential employers in a simulated work-sampling task. Journal of Applied Psychology, 59 705-711.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jako, R. A., & Murphy, K. R. (1990). Distributional ratings, judgement decomposition, and their impact on interrater agreement and rating accuracy. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75 500-505.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kalin, R., & Hodgins, D. C. (1984). Sex bias in judgments of occupation suitability. Canadian Journal of Behavioral Science, 16 311-325.

    Google Scholar 

  • Locksley, A., Borgida, E., Brekke, N., & Hepburn, C. (1980). Sex stereotypes and social judgment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39 821-831.

    Google Scholar 

  • Locksley, A., Hepburn, C., & Ortiz, V. (1982). Social stereotypes and judgments of individuals: An instance of the base-rate fallacy. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 18 23-42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Macdonald, A. P. (1970). Revised scale for ambiguity tolerance: Reliability and validity. Psychological Reports, 26 791-798.

    Google Scholar 

  • Macrae, C. N., Milne, A. B., & Bodenhausen, G. V. (1994). Stereotypes as energy-saving devices: A peek inside the cognitive toolbox. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66 37-47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martell, R. F. (1996). What mediates gender bias in work behavior ratings? Sex Roles, 35 153-169.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martell, R. F., & Guzzo, R. A. (1991). The dynamics of implicit theories of work group performance: When and how do they operate? Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50 51-74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martell, R. F., & Willis, C. E. (1993). Effects of observer's performance expectations on behavior ratings of work groups: Memory response bias? Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 56 91-109.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martinko, M., & Gardner, W. (1983). A methodological review of sex-related access discrimination problems. Sex Roles, 18 23-42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maurer, T. J., & Taylor, M. A. (1994). Is sex by itself enough? An exploration of gender bias issues in performance appraisal. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 60 231-251.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mobley, W. H. (1982). Supervisor and employee race and sex effects on performance appraisals: A field study of adverse impact and generalizability. Academy of Management Journal, 25 598-606.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murphy, K. R., Garcia, M., Kerkar, S., Martin, C., & Balzer, W. K. (1982). Relationship between observational accuracy and accuracy in evaluating performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 67 320-325.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, T. E., Acker, M., & Manis, M. (1996). Irrepressible stereotypes. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 32 13-38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, T. E., Biernat, M. R., & Manis, M. (1990). Everyday base rates (sex stereotypes): Potent and resilient. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59 664-675.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nieva, V. F., & Gutek, B. A. (1980). Sex effects on evaluation. Academy of Management Review, 5 267-276.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pazy, A. (1986). The persistence of pro-male bias despite identical information regarding causes of success. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 38 366-377.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peters, L. H., Terborg, J. R., & Taynor, J. (1974). Women as managers scale: A measure of attitudes toward women in managerial positions. Journal Supplement Abstract Service Catalog of Selected Documents in Psychology, 4 27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pratto, F., & Bargh, J. A. (1991). Stereotyping based on apparently individuating information: Trait and global components of sex stereotypes under attention overload. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 27 26-47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pulakos, E. D., White, L. A., Oppler, S. H., & Borman, W. C. (1989). Examination of race and sex effects on performance ratings. Journal of Applied Psychology, 74 770-780.

    Google Scholar 

  • Regents of the University of California v. Bakke. (1978). U.S. Law Weekly, 49 4896.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rinehart, J. S., & Young, I. P. (1996). Effects of teacher gender and principal gender on the ratings of teacher performance. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 10 313-323.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robbins, T. L., & DiNisi, A. S. (1993). Moderators of sex bias in the performance appraisal process: A cognitive analysis. Journal of Management, 19 113-126.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sauser, W. I., Evans, K. L., & Champion, C. H. (1979). Two hundred and fifty scaled incidents of college classroom behavior. Paper presented at the Southeastern Psychological Association annual conference, New Orleans.

  • Seta, J. J., & Seta, C. E. (1993). Stereotypes and the generation of compensatory and noncompensatory expectancies of group members. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 19 722-731.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaw, E. A. (1972). Differential impact of negative stereotyping in employee selection. Personnel Psychology, 25 333-338.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sidanius, J., & Crane, M. (1989). Job evaluation and gender: The case of university faculty. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 19 174-197.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snyder, M., Campbell, B. H., & Preston, E. (1982). Testing hypotheses about human nature: Assessing the accuracy of social stereotypes. Social Cognition, 1 256-272.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snyder, M., & Gangestad, S. (1986). On the nature of self-monitoring: Matters of assessment, Matters of validity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51 125-139.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swim, J., Borgida, E., Maruyama, G., & Myers, D. G. (1989). Joan McKay versus John McKay: Do gender stereotypes bias evaluations. Psychological Bulletin, 105 409-429.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swim, J. K., & Sanna, L. J. (1996). He's skilled, she's lucky: A meta-analysis of observers' attributions for women's and men's successes and failures. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 22 507-519.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, D. E., & Thompson, T. A. (1985). Task-based performance appraisal for blue-collar jobs: Evaluation of race and sex effects. Journal of Applied Psychology, 70 747-753.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watson, D., Clark, L., & Tellegen, A. (1988). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS Scale. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54 1063-1070.

    Google Scholar 

  • Webster, D. M., & Kruglanski, A. W. (1994). Individual differences in need for cognitive closure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67 1049-1062.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wegner, D. M. (1994). Ironic processes of mental control. Psychological Review, 101 34-52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woehr, D. J., & Lance, C. E. (1991). Paper people versus direct observation: An empirical examination of laboratory methodologies. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 12 387-397.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yammarino, F. J., & Dubinsky, A. J. (1988). Employee responses: Gender—or job-related differences? Journal of Vocational Behavior, 32 366-383.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bauer, C.C., Baltes, B.B. Reducing the Effects of Gender Stereotypes on Performance Evaluations. Sex Roles 47, 465–476 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021652527696

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021652527696

  • performance evaluation
  • stereotypes
  • gender bias
  • structured free recall