Skip to main content
Log in

Patent Related Indicators for Assessing Knowledge-Generating Institutions: Towards a Contextualised Approach

  • Published:
The Journal of Technology Transfer Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This contribution aims at examining the extent to which patent related indicators are relevant for shedding light on the notion of excellence within knowledge-generating institutions. Traditionally, excellence has been looked upon as the ability to create interesting and valuable new scientific concepts, theories and data. From such a perspective, scientific excellence can be assessed through scientometric measures of publication output and impact. The recent interest in the ‘entrepreneurial’ phenomenon within knowledge-generating institutes justifies efforts to examine the relevancy of broadening the set of indicators used to assess such institutions into the direction of entrepreneurial excellence. In this paper we will examine the relevancy of using patent data in order to delineate such additional, more entrepreneurial oriented, indicators. The arguments and findings presented in this respect will lead us to a plea for the use of these indicators in a contextualized manner.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Balconi, M., S. Breschi, and F. Lissoni, 2002, ‘Networks of Inventors and the Location of Industry Research: An Exploration of Italian Data'. Paper presented at the SPRU NPRnet Conference ‘Rethinking Science Policy: Analytical Frameworks for Evidence-Based Policy'.

  • Branscomb, L.M., F. Kodama, and R. Florida, 1999, Industrializing Knowledge: University-Industry Linkages in Japan and the United States, London: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caniels, M.C.J., 1997, ‘The Geographic Distribution of Patents and Value Added Across European Regions', Working Paper, Maastricht Economic Research Institute on Innovation and Technology (MERIT), Maastricht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cesaroni, F. and A. Piccaluga, 2002, ‘Patenting Activity of European Universities. Relevant? Growing? Useful?’ Paper presented at the SPRU NPRnet Conference ‘Rethinking Science Policy: Analytical Frameworks for Evidence-Based Policy'.

  • David, P.A., D. Foray, and W.E. Steinmueller, 1997, ‘The Research Network and the New Economics of Science: From Metaphors to Organizational Behaviour'. In A. Gambardella and F. Malerba (eds. ), 1999, The Organisation of Innovative Activities in Europe, Cambridge University Press.

  • Debackere, K., 2000, ‘Research as a Business at K. U. Leuven; Structure, Process and Context', R&D Management 30(4), 323–328.

    Google Scholar 

  • EC (European Commission), 1997, Second European Report on S&T Indicators.

  • Etzkowitz, H., 1998, ‘The Norms of Entrepreneurial Science: Cognitive Effects of the New University-Industry Linkage', Research Policy 27(8), 823.

    Google Scholar 

  • Etzkowitz, H. and C. Kemelgor, 1998, ‘The Role of Research Centres in the Collectivisation of Academic Science', Minerva 36, 271–288.

    Google Scholar 

  • Etzkowitz, H., and L. Leydesdorff, 1997, ‘Introduction to Special Issue on Science Policy Dimensions of the Triple Helix of University-Industry-Government Relations', Science and Public Policy 24(1), 2–5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Etzkowitz, H. and L. Leydesdorff, 2000, ‘The Dynamics of Innovation: From National Systems and ‘Mode 2’ to a Triple Helix of University-Industry-Government Relations', Research Policy 29, 109–123.

    Google Scholar 

  • Etzkowitz, H., A. Webster, and P. Healey, 1998, Capitalizing Knowledge: New Intersections of Industry and Academia, Albany: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, C., 1987, Technology Policy and Economic Performance, London: Pinter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geuna, A., 1998, ‘The Internationalisation of European Universities: A Return to Medieval Roots', Minerva 36, 253–270.

    Google Scholar 

  • Griliches, Z., 1990, ‘Patent Statistics as Economic Indicators: A Survey', Journal of Economic Literature 28, 1661–1707.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grupp, H., 1998, Foundations of the Economics of Innovation, Cheltenham, UK; Northampton, MA, USA: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grupp, H. and U. Schmoch, 1999, ‘Patent Statistics in the Age of Globalisation: New Legal Procedures, New Analytical Methods, New Economic Interpretation?’ Research Policy 28, 377–396.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hane, G., 1999, ‘Comparing University-Industry Linkages in the United States and Japan'. In L. M. Branscomb, F. Kodama, and R. Florida (eds. ), Industrializing Knowledge. London: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henderson, R., A.B. Jaffé, and M. Trajtenberg, 1998, ‘Universities as a Source of Commercial Technology: A Detailed Analysis of University Patenting, 1965 -1988', The Review of Economics and Statistics 80(1), 119–127.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jaffe, A. and M. Tratjenberg (eds. ), 2002, Patents, Citations and Innovations; a Window on the KnowledgeEconomy, MIT Press.

  • Kodama, F. and L. Branscomb, 1999, ‘University Research as an Engine for Growth: How Realistic Is the Vision?’ in L.M. Branscomb, F. Kodama, and R. Florida (eds. ), Industrializing Knowledge.

  • Leydesdorff, L., and H. Etzkowitz, 1996, ‘Emergence of a Triple Helix of University-Industry-Goverment Relations', Science and Public Policy 23(5), 279–286.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leydesdorff, L., and H. Etzkowitz, 1998, ‘Triple Helix of Innovation: Introduction', Science and Public Policy 25(6), 358–364.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lundvall, B. A., 1992, National Systems of Innovation, London: Pinter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luwel, M., E.C.M. Noyons, and H.F. Moed, 1999, ‘Bibliometric Assessment of Research Performance in Flanders: Policy Background and Implications’, R&D Management 29(2), 133–141.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, B.R., 1996, ‘The Use of Multiple Indicators in the Assessment of Basic Research’, Scientometrics 36, 343–362.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer-Krahmer, F. and U. Schmoch, 1998, ‘Science-Based Technologies: University-Industry Interactions in Four Fields', Research Policy 27(8), 835–852.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moed, H.F., R.E. De Bruin, and Th.N. van Leeuwen, 1995, ‘New Bibliometric Tools for the Assessment of National Research Performance: Database Description, Overview of Indicators and First Applications', Scientometrics 33, 381–422.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mowery, D. and A. Ziedonis, 2002, ‘Academic Patent Quality and Quantity before and after the Bayh-Dole Act in the United States', Research Policy 31(3), 399–419.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mowery, D.C., R.R. Nelson, B.N. Sampat, et al., 2000, ‘The Growth of Patenting and Licensing by US Universities: An Assessment of the Effects of the Bayh-Dole Act of 1980', Research Policy 30(1), 99–119.

    Google Scholar 

  • Narin, F., K.S. Hamilton, and D. Olivastro, 1997, ‘The Increasing Linkage between US Technology and Science', Research Policy 26, 317–330.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, R.R. (ed. ), 1993, National Innovation Systems, Oxford University Press.

  • Nelson, R.R., and N. Rosenberg, 1993, ‘Technical Innovation and National Systems'. In R.R. Nelson (ed. ), 1993, National Innovation Systems, Oxford University Press.

  • OECD, 1994a, ‘The Measurement of Scientific and Technological Activities. Using Patent Data as Science and Technology Indicators', Patent Manual 1994, Paris.

  • Pavitt, K., 1997, ‘Do Patents Reflect the Useful Research Output of Universities?’ SPRU Electronic Working Papers Series, 6.

  • Porter, M., 1995, The Competitive Advantage of Nations, New York: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenberg, N. and R. Nelson, 1994, ‘American Universities and Technical Advance in Industry', Research Policy 3, 323–348.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saragossi, S. and B. van Pottelsberghe de la Potterie, 2003, ‘What Patent Data Reveal about Universities: The Case of Belgium', Journal of Technology Transfer 28, 47–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmoch, U., 1997, ‘Indicators and the Relations between Science and Technology', Scientometrics No 38, 103–116.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmoch, U., E. Strauss, H. Grupp, and T. Reiss, 1993, ‘Indicators of the Scientific Base of European Patents', Report to the European Commission, EUR 15 330 EN, Brussels/Luxemburg.

  • Soete, L.G. and S.M.E. Wyatt, 1983, ‘The Use of Foreign Patenting as an Internationally Comparable Science and Technology Output Indicator', Scientometrics 5(1), 31–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steinmueller, W.E., 1994, ‘Basic Research and Industrial Innovation'. In M. Dodgson and R. Rothwell (eds. ), 1994, The Handbook of Industrial Innovation, Aldershot: Edward Elgar, pp. 54–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thursby, J. and S. Kemp, 2002, ‘Growth and Productive Efficiency of University Intellectual Property Licensing', Research Policy 31, 109–124.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tijssen, R.J.W., 1992, ‘Cartography of Science: Scientometric Mapping with Multidimensional Scaling Methods'. Doctoral Dissertation, Rijksuniversiteit Leiden: DSWO Press, 307 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tijssen, R.J.W., 2002, ‘Towards New Indicators for Identifying and Comparing Major European Providers of Scientific Knowledge: Conceptual and Analytical Framework’ Draft Positioning Paper, EC Research Project CESE-IRRA.

  • Tijssen, R.J.W., R.K. Buter, and Th.N. Van Leeuwen, 2000, ‘Technological Relevance of Science: Validation and Analysis of Citation Linkages between Patents and Research Papers', Scientometrics 47, 389–412.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Looy, B., K. Debackere, and P. Andries, 2002, ‘Stimulating Regional Development through Knowledge Driven Entrepreneurship', in C. Steyaert, D. Hjörth, et al. (eds.), Moving Entrepreneurship, Edward Elgar Publishers.

  • Varga, A., 1998, University Research and Regional Innovation, Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Verbeek, A., P. Andries, J. Callaert, K. Debackere, M. Luwel, and R. Veugelers, 2001a, ‘Linking Science to Technology: Bibliographic References in Patents —Methodological Framework,’ Report to the European Commission, Part B, Brussels.

  • Verbeek, A., K. Debackere, M. Luwel, and E. Zimmermann, 2002, ‘Measuring Progress and Evolution in Science and Technology —I: The Multiple Uses of Bibliometric Indicators', International Journal of Management Reviews 4(2), 179–211.

    Google Scholar 

  • Verbeek, A., K. Debackere, M. Luwel, P. Andries, E. Zimmermann, and F. Deleus, 2002a, ‘Linking Science to Technology: Using Bibliographic References in Patents to Build Linkage Schemes', Scientometrics 54(1-2).

  • Verbeek, A., E. Zimmermann, P. Andries, K. Debackere, M. Luwel, and R. Veugelers, 2001b, ‘Linking Science to Technology: Bibliographic References in patents —State of the Art', Report to the European Commission, Part A, Brussels.

  • Verbeek, A., J. Callaert, P. Andries, K. Debackere, M. Luwel, and R. Veugelers, 2002b, ‘Science and Technology Interplay—A Modelling Approach on a Regional Level’, Final Report to the EC DG Research, Brussels —Fourthcoming in the 3rd European Indicators Report 2002.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Van Looy, B., Callaert, J., Debackere, K. et al. Patent Related Indicators for Assessing Knowledge-Generating Institutions: Towards a Contextualised Approach. The Journal of Technology Transfer 28, 53–61 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021630803637

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021630803637

Keywords

Navigation