Behavior Genetics

, Volume 28, Issue 5, pp 391–394 | Cite as

Courtship Bout Duration in per Circadian Period Mutants In Drosophila melanogaster

  • John P. Roche
  • Becky C. Pregger Talyn
  • Harold B. Dowse
Article

Abstract

Mutations on the period locus of Drosophila melanogaster influence circadian periods as well as the rhythm in inter-pulse intervals in male courtship song; perL mutations produce long circadian periods and courtship song rhythms and pers mutations produce short circadian periods and courtship song rhythms. Thus, these mutations influence timing mechanisms over both long and short behavioral time horizons. We examined if the mean courtship duration of male Drosophila melanogaster cycles rhythmically, and if mutations at the period locus influence courtship bout duration. We measured the courtship bout durations of the following: (1) wild type Canton-S (per+) males; (2) perL males; and (3)pers males. Rhythmicity of courtship bout duration could not be mathematically determined. Mean courtship bout duration did not differ among the three groups; thus, mutations at the period locus did not influence mean courtship duration. There was a nonsignificant trend for per+ males that were successful at mating to have longer mean courtship duration than unsuccessful males.

Drosophila melanogaster circadian period mutants mate choice courtship 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

REFERENCES

  1. Alt, S., Ringo, J., Talyn, B., Bray, W., and D. Dowse, D. (In press). The period gene controls courtship song cycles in Drosophila melanogaster. Anim. Behav. Google Scholar
  2. Bastock, M. and Manning, A. (1955). The courtship of Drosophila melanogaster. Behavior 8:85–111.Google Scholar
  3. Bennet-Clark, H. C., and Ewing, A. (1967). Stimuli provided by courtship of male Drosophila melanogaster. Nature 215:669–671.Google Scholar
  4. Burnet, B., and Connolly, K. J. (1974). Activity and sexual behavior in Drosophila melanogaster. In Van Abeelen, J. H. F. (ed.), The Genetics of Behavior, North Holland Publication Co, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
  5. Casares, P., Carracedo, M. C., San Migues, Pineiro, E. R., and Garcia-Florez, L. (1993). Male mating speed in Drosophila melanogaster: Differences in genetic architecture and in relative performance according to female genotype. Behav. Genet. 23:349–358.Google Scholar
  6. Chatfield, C. (1980). The analysis of time series. Chapman and Hall, London.Google Scholar
  7. Connolly, K. J., and Cook, R. (1973). Rejection responses by female Drosophila melanogaster: their ontogeny, causality, and effects upon the behavior of the courting male. Behaviour 44:142–166.Google Scholar
  8. Cowling, D. E. and Burnet, B. (1981). Courtship songs and genetic control of their acoustic characteristics in sibling species of the Drosophila melanogaster subgroup. Anim. Behav. 29:924–935.Google Scholar
  9. Dowse, H. B., and J. M. Ringo (1989) The search for hidden periodicities in biological time series revisited. J. Theor. Biol. 139:487–515.Google Scholar
  10. Ewing, L. S., and Ewing, A. W. (1984). Courtship in Drosophila melanogaster in large observation chambers: the influence of female reproductive state. Behavior 101:243–252.Google Scholar
  11. Greenacre, M. L., Ritchie, M. G., Byrne, B. C., and Kyriacou, C. P. (1993). Female song preference and the period gene in Drosophila. Behavior Genetics 23:85–90.Google Scholar
  12. Gromko, M. H. and Markow, T. A. (1993). Courtship and remating in field populations of Drosophila. Anim. Behav. 45:253–262.Google Scholar
  13. Jallon, J-M (1984). A few chemical words exchanged by Drosophila during courtship and mating. Behav. Genet. 14:441–478.Google Scholar
  14. Konopka, R. J., and Benzer, S. (1971). Clock mutants of Drosophila melanogaster. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 68:2112–2116.Google Scholar
  15. Kyriacou, C. P., and Hall, J. C. (1980). Circadian rhythm mutations in Drosophila affect short-term fluctuations in the male's courtship song. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 77:6929–6233.Google Scholar
  16. Kyriacou, C. P., and Hall, J. C. (1989). Spectral analysis of Drosophila courtship song rhythms. Anim. Behav. 37:850–859.Google Scholar
  17. Markow, T. A. and Hanson, S. J. (1981). Multivariate analysis of Drosophila courtship. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 78:430–434.Google Scholar
  18. Parker, G. A. (1983). Mate quality and mating decisions. In: Mate Choice (Bateson, P., ed.). Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge. pp. 141–166.Google Scholar
  19. Spieth, H. T. (1952). Mating behavior within the genus Drosophila (Diptera). Bull. Am. Mus. Nat. Hist. 99:401–474.Google Scholar
  20. Spieth, H. T. (1974). Courtship behavior in Drosophila. Ann. Rev. Entomol. 19:385–405.Google Scholar
  21. Spieth, H. T. and Ringo, J. M. (1983). Mating behavior and sexual isolation in Drosophila. In Ashburner, M., Carson, H. and Thompson, J. (eds.), The Genetics and Biology of Drosophila, Vol. 3., Academic Press, New York, pp. 223–284.Google Scholar
  22. Van den Berg, M. J. (1985). The influence of isolation during rearing on male vigor in D. melanogaster. Drosophila Information Service 60:179.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1998

Authors and Affiliations

  • John P. Roche
    • 1
  • Becky C. Pregger Talyn
    • 2
  • Harold B. Dowse
    • 2
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Biology and CISABIndiana UniveristyBloomington
  2. 2.Department of Biological SciencesUniversity of MaineOrono
  3. 3.Department of Mathematics and StatisticsUniversity of MaineOrono

Personalised recommendations