Skip to main content
Log in

Relationships between Arceuthobium americanum and the structure of Pinus contorta var. murrayana stands in central Oregon

  • Published:
Plant Ecology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We examined the importance of the dwarf mistletoe Arceuthobiumamericanum in determining the size-class structure ofPinuscontorta var. murrayana forests in the centralOregon pumice zone. We considered the interrelationships among A.americanum abundance, P. contorta populationstructure, soil type, site topography, the density of competing tree and shrubspecies, and understory woody litter. We found that A.americanum was associated with reduced live basal area(P < 0.001) and increased bole diameter variability(P < 0.001) of P. contorta, andalso with an increase in the density of saplings and seedlings(P < 0.001) at the expense of dominant andtall-intermediate trees. Saplings and seedlings were over 15 times as dense inheavily infested stands as in uninfested stands. Reflecting this shift towardsmaller size classes, each unit increase in stand-level dwarf mistletoe rating(DMR) reduced live basal area by 1.32 m2/ha and reducedthe density of dominant-sized trees by 45 trees/ha. The significant reductionsin live basal area and the density of dominant trees contrast with otherstudiesconducted in P. contorta stands containing A.americanum. However, DMR uniquely explained less than 25% of thetotal site-level variance in all size class variables except sapling density(36%), and varied in importance relative to interspecific competition betweenPinus ponderosa and P. contorta, theeffects of abiotic factors, and intercohort dynamics in determining thestructureof P. contorta stands across the study site. DMR uniquelyexplained less of the variance in live basal area (12%) than abiotic factors(28%) and P. ponderosa density (16%), and only 15% ofvariability in the density of the dominant P. contortasizeclass. Furthermore, the relative effects of DMR on specific P.contorta size classes varied across patch- and stand-level spatialscales. We conclude that the relative importance of the effects of A.americanum on specific P. contorta size classesdepends on spatial scale, and should be interpreted in relation to patchdynamics, site-level topoedaphic variability, and interspecific competitionamong the dominant tree species present.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Agee J.K. 1993. Fire Ecology of Pacific Northwest Forests. Island Press, Washington, DC, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alexander M.E. and Hawksworth F.G. 1975. Wildland fires and dwarf mistletoes: a literature review of ecology and prescribed burning. General Technical Report RM-14. USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, Fort Collins, CO, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Auspurger C.K. 1989. Impact of pathogens on natural plant populations.In: Davy A.G., Watkinson A.R. and Hutchings M.J. (eds), Plant Population Ecology: the 28th Symposium of the British Ecological Society, Sussex, 1987. Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford, England, pp. 413–433.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baranyay J.A. and Smith R.B. 1972. Dwarf mistletoes in British Columbia and recommendations for their control. Report BCX-72, Canadian Forestry Service. Pacific Forest Research Center, Victoria, BC, Canada.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brower J., Zar J. and von Ende C. 1990. Field and Laboratory Methods for General Ecology. Wm. C. Brown Publishers, Dubuque, IA, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burdon J.J. 1987. Diseases and Plant Population Biology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Busing R.T. and White P.S. 1997. Species diversity and small-scale disturbance in an old-growth temperate forest: a consideration of gap partitioning concepts. Oikos 78: 562–568.

    Google Scholar 

  • Busse M.D., Cochran P.H. and Barrett J.W. 1996. Changes in ponderosa pine site productivity following removal of understory vegetation. Soil Science Society of America Journal 60: 1614–1621.

    Google Scholar 

  • Castello J.D., Leopold D.J. and Smallidge P.J. 1995. Pathogens, patterns, and processes in forest ecosystems. Bioscience 45: 16–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Childs T.W. and Shea K.R. 1967. Annual Losses from Diseases in Pacific Northwest Forests. Resource Bulletin PNW-32, USDA Forest Service. Pacific Northwest Forest and Range Experiment Station, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark J.S. 1991. Disturbance and population structure on the shifting mosaic landscape. Ecology 72: 1119–1137.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clements F.E. 1928. Plant Succession and Indicators. H. W. Wilson, New York, NY, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cochran P.H. and Berntsen C.M. 1973. Tolerance of lodgepole and ponderosa pine seedlings to low night temperatures. Forest Science 19: 272–280.

    Google Scholar 

  • Day F.P. and Monk C.D. 1974. Vegetation Patterns on a Southern Appalachian Watershed. Ecology 55: 1064–1074.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dinoor A. and Eshed N. 1984. The role and importance of pathogens in natura1 plant communities. Annual Review of Phytopathology 22: 443–466.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dobson A. and Crawley M. 1994. Pathogens and the structure of plant communities. Trends in Ecology and Evolution9: 393–398.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drummond D.B. 1982. Timber loss estimates for the coniferous forests of the United States due to dwarf mistletoes. Forest Pest Management Report 83-2. USDA Forest Service, Methods Application Group, Fort Collins, CO, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Franklin J.F. and Dyrness C.T. 1988. Natural Vegetation of Oregon and Washington. Oregon State University Press, OR, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fralish J.S. 1994. The effect of site environment on forest productivity in the Illinois Shawnee Hills. Ecological Applications 4: 134–143.

    Google Scholar 

  • Godfree R.C. 2000. Lodgepole pine dwarf mistletoe (Arceuthobium americanum) in central Oregon lodgepole pine (Pinus contorta var. murrayana) stands: effects on crown architecture, population dynamics, canopy structure and understory composition. PhD Dissertation, Portland State University, Portland, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haack R.A. and Byler J.W. 1993. Insects and pathogens: Regulators of forest ecosystems. Journal of Forestry 91: 32–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hawksworth F.G. 1977. The 6-class dwarf mistletoe system. General Technical Report RM-48. USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, Fort Collins, CO, USA.

  • Hawksworth F.G. and Wiens D. 1996. Dwarf Mistletoes: Biology, Pathology and Systematics. Agriculture Handbook 709. USDA Forest Service, Washington, DC, USA.

  • Holah J.C., Wilson M.V. and Hansen E.M. 1997. Impacts of a native root-rotting pathogen on successional development of oldgrowth Douglas fir forests.Oecologia 111: 429–433.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hopkins W.E. and Rawlings R.C. 1985. Major indicator shrubs and herbs on national forests of eastern Oregon. Publication R6-TM-190-1985. USDA Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Region, USA.

  • Hurlbert S.H. 1984. Pseudoreplication and the design of ecological field experiments. Ecological Monographs 54: 187–211.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnstone W.D. 1985. Thinning lodgepole pine. In: Baumgartner D.M., Krebill R.G., Arnott J.T. and Weetman G.F. (eds), Lodgepole pine: the species and its management. Symposium Proceedings, May 8-10, 1984. Spokane, WA, USA, pp. 253–262.

  • Kneeshaw D.D. and Bergeron Y. 1996. Ecological factors affecting the abundance of advance regeneration in Quebec's southwestern boreal forest. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 26: 888– 898.

    Google Scholar 

  • Larsen D.M. 1976. Soil Resource Inventory: Deschutes National Forest. USDA Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Region, USA.

  • Legendre L. and Legendre P. 1998. Numerical Ecology. Developments in Environmental Modelling 20. 2nd edn. Elsevier, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

  • Lotan J.E. and Perry D.A. 1983. Ecology and Regeneration of Lodgepole Pine. Agricultural Handbook 606. USDA Forest Service, Washington, DC, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mathaisen R.L. 1996. Dwarf mistletoes on forest canopies. Northwest Science 70: 61–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oliver W.W. 1990. Spacing and shrub competition influence 20-year development of planted ponderosa pine. Western Journal of Applied Forestry 5: 79–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parker A.J. 1986. Persistence of lodgepole pine forests in the central Sierra Nevada. Ecology 67: 1560–1567.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peet R.K. 1981. Forest vegetation of the Colorado Front Range: composition and dynamics. Vegetatio 45: 3–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Runkle J.R. 1985. Disturbance regimes in temperate forests. In: Pickett S.T.A. and White P.S. (eds), The Ecology of Natural Disturbance in Temperate Forests. Academic Press, Orlando, FL, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith T.M. and Urban D.L. 1988. Scale and resolution of forest structural pattern. Vegetatio 74: 143–150.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stuart J.D., Agee J.K. and Gara R.I. 1989. Lodgepole pine regeneration in an old, self perpetuating forest in south central Oregon. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 19: 1096–1104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tabachnick B.G. and Fidell L.S. 1996. Using Multivariate Statistics. 3rd edn. Harper Collins, New York, NY, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tinnin R.O. 1984. The effects of dwarf mistletoe on forest community ecology. In: Hawksworth F.G. and Scharpf R.F. (eds), Biology of Dwarf Mistletoes: Proceedings of the Symposium. General Technical Report RM-111. USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, Fort Collins, CO, USA, pp. 117–122.

  • Tinnin R.O., Hawksworth F.G. and Knutson D.M. 1982. Witches' broom formation in conifers infected by Arceuthobium spp.: an example of parasitic impact on community dynamics. American Midland Naturalist 107:351–359.

    Google Scholar 

  • van der Kamp B.J. 1991. Pathogens as agents of diversity in forested landscapes. Forestry Chronicle 67: 353–354.

    Google Scholar 

  • Volland L.A. 1985a. Plant Associations of the Central Oregon Pumice Zone. Publication R6-ECOL-104. USDA Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Region.

  • Volland L.A. 1985b. Ecological classification of lodgepole pine in the United States. In: Baumgartner D.M., Krebill R.G., Arnott J.T. and Weetman G.F. (eds), Lodgepole pine: the species and its management. Symposium Proceedings, May 8-10, 1984., Spokane, WA, USA, pp. 63–75.

  • Vyse A. and Navratil S. 1985. Advances in lodgepole pine regeneration. In: Baumgartner D.M., Krebill R.G., Arnott J.T. and Weetman G.F. (eds), Lodgepole pine: the species and its management. Symposium Proceedings, May 8-10, 1984. Spokane, Spokane, WA, USA, pp. 173–186.

  • Wanner J.L. 1986. Effects of infection by dwarf mistletoe (Arceuthobium americanum) on the population dynamics of lodgepole pine (Pinus contorta). PhD Dissertation, Portland State University, Portland, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wanner J.L. and Tinnin R.O. 1989. Some effects of infection by Arceuthobium americanum on the population dynamics of Pinus contorta in Oregon. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 19: 736–742.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zimmerman G.T. and Laven R.D. 1984. Ecological interrelationships of dwarf mistletoe and fire in lodgepole pine forest. In: Biology of dwarf mistletoes: Proceedings of the symposium; August 8; 1984, Fort Collins, CO., USA. General Technical Report RM-111. USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, Fort Collins, CO, USA, pp. 123–131.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Robert C. Godfree.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Godfree, R.C., Tinnin, R.O. & Forbes, R.B. Relationships between Arceuthobium americanum and the structure of Pinus contorta var. murrayana stands in central Oregon. Plant Ecology 165, 69–84 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021598712920

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021598712920

Navigation