Abstract
We study a magnetic field distribution that is nonuniform and sheared like in tangential discontinuities. This distribution is an input parameter for the numerical integration of the equations of motion of the test-particle and of its guiding center. Two different electric field distributions are alternatively tested. In the first case, the electric field is uniform and constant like the electric field prescribed in the large-scale, steady-state reconnection models. The numerical solution shows that in this case the test-particle is trapped within the discontinuity into a region where (i) B goes to zero or (ii) the magnetic vector becomes exactly parallel to the electric field. In the second case, we consider an electric field, which is nonuniform. Its components are computed such that the zero order (or electric) drift is everywhere perpendicular to the discontinuity surface and its value is conserved throughout the simulation. In this case the numerically integrated trajectory of the test-particle penetrates the discontinuity for any angle of shear of B. Direct comparison between exact (Newton–Lorentz) and approximated (first order drift) numerical solutions shows that the mathematical singularities of the latter do not correspond to any physical singularity of the exact equation of motion of the particle.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
Burlaga, L.F., Directional Discontinuities in the Interplanetary Magnetic Field, Solar Phys., 1969, vol. 7, p.54.
Lemaire, J. and Burlaga, L.F., Diamagnetic Boundary Layers: a Kinetic Theory, Astrophys. Space Sci., 1976, vol. 45, p. 303.
Berchem, J. and Russell, C.T., Magnetic Field Rotation through the Magnetopause: ISEE 1 and 2 Observations, J. Geophys. Res., 1982, vol. 87, p. 8139.
Papamastorakis, I., Paschmann, G., Sckopke, N., Bame, ?S.J., and Berchem, J., The Magnetopause as a Tangential Discontinuity for Large Field Rotation Angle, J. Geophys. Res., 1984, vol. 89, p. 127.
Priest, E.R. and Forbes, T.G., New Models for Fast Steady State Magnetic Reconnection, J. Geophys. Res., 1986, vol. 91, p. 5579.
Pudovkin, L. and Semenov, V.S., Magnetic Field Reconnection Theory and the Solar Wind-Magnetosphere Interaction: A Review, Space Sci. Rev., 1985, vol. 41, p.1.
Lemaire, J., Plasmoid Motion across a Tangential Discontinuity (with Application to the Magnetopause), J. Plasma Phys., 1985, vol. 33, p. 425.
Buneman, O., Internal Dynamics of a Plasma Propelled across a Magnetic Field, IEEE Transactions on Plasma Science, 1992, vol. 20, p. 672.
Vasyliunas, V.M., Theoretical Models of Magnetic Field Line Merging, Rev. Geophys., 1975, vol. 13, p. 303.
Sestero, A., Structure of Plasma Sheaths, Phys. Fluids, 1964, vol. 7, p. 44.
Roth, M., Structure of Tangential Discontinuities at the Magnetopause: the Nose of the Magnetopause, J. Atmos. Terr. Phys., 1978, vol. 40, p. 323.
Lee, L.C. and Kan, J.R., A Unified Kinetic Model of the Tangential Magnetopause Structure, J. Geophys. Res., 1979, vol. 84, p. 6417.
Roth, M., DeKeyzer, J., and Kuznetsova, M., Vlasov Theory of the Equilibrium Structure of Tangential Discontinuities in Space Plasmas, Space Sci. Rev., 1996, vol. 76, p. 251.
Alfven, H., Cosmical Electrodynamics, Oxford: Clarendon, 1950. Translated under the title Kosmicheskaya elektrodinamika, Moscow: Mir, dy1957.
Northrop, T., The Adiabatic Motion of Charged Particles, Intertscience Publishers, 1963.
Speiser, T.W., Particle Trajectories in Model Current Sheets: 1. Analytical Solutions, J. Geophys. Res., 1965, vol. 70, p. 4219.
Speiser, T.W., Particle Trajectories in Model Current Sheets: 2. Applications to Auroras Using a Geomagnetic Tail Model, J. Geophys. Res., 1967, vol. 72, p. 3919.
Eastwood, J.W., Consistency of Fields and Particle Motion in the “Speiser” Model of the Current Sheet, Planet. Space Sci., 1972, vol. 20, p. 1555.
Wagner, J.S., Kan, J.R., and Akasofu, S.-L., Particle Dynamics in the Plasma Sheet, J. Geophys. Res., 1979, vol. 84, p. 891.
Wagner, J.S., Gary, P.C., Kan, J.R., Tajima, T., and Akasofu, S.-L., Particle Dynamics in Reconnection Field Configuration, Planet. Space Sci., 1981, vol. 29, p. 391.
Buchner, J. and Zelenyi, L., Regular and Chaotic Charged Particle Motion in Magnetotaillike Field Reversals: 1. Basic Theory of Trapped Motion, J. Geophys. Res., 1989, vol. 94, p. 11821.
Chen, J., Nonlinear Dynamics of Charged Particles in the Magnetotail, J. Geophys. Res., 1992, vol. 97, p.15011.
Cole, K.D., Effects of Crossed Magnetic and (Spatially Dependent) Electric Fields on Charged Particle Motion, Planet. Space Sci., 1976, vol. 24, p. 515.
Rothwell, P.L., Silevitch, M.B., Block, L.P., and Falthammar, C.-G., Particle Dynamics in a Spatially Varying Electric Field, J. Geophys. Res., 1995, vol. 100, p.14875.
Press, W.H., Flanerry, B.P., Teukolski, S.A., and Vetterling, W.T., Numerical Recipes in FORTRAN: the Art of Scientific Computing, 2nd Edition, Cambridge, England, 1992.
Speiser, T.W., Williams, D.J., and Garcia, H.A., Magnetospherically Trapped Ions as a Source of Magnetosheath Energetic Ions, J. Geophys. Res., 1981, vol. 86, p.723.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Echim, M.M. Test-Particle Trajectories in a “Sheared” Stationary Field: Newton–Lorentz and First Order Drift Numerical Simulations1. Cosmic Research 40, 534–546 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021597428220
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021597428220