Skip to main content
Log in

Editorial

  • Editorial Introduction
  • Published:
Erkenntnis Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

REFERENCES

  • Cairnes, J.: 1857, The Character and Logical Method of Political Economy, Longman, Brown, Green, Longmans and Roberts, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cairnes, J.: 1874, Some Leading Principles of Political Economy Newly Expounded, Harper and Bros, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, D.: 1973, Counterfactuals, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marshall, A.: 1890, Principles of Economics, Quotation from the 8th edition, Macmillan, London, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mill, J. S.: 1843, A System of Logic, J. W. Parker, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, S. D.: 1997, ‘Pragmatic Laws’, in L. Darden (ed.), PSA 1996: Part II, Symposia Papers, Philosophy of Science (special issue), S468–S479.

  • Mitchell, S. D.: 2000, ‘Dimensions of Scientific Law’, Philosophy of Science 67, 242–265.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Persky, J.: 1990, ‘Ceteris Paribus’, Journal of Economic Perspectives 4, 187–193.

    Google Scholar 

  • Petty, W.: 1662, Treatise of Taxes and Contributions, Printed for N. Brooke, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schurz, G.: 1995, ‘Theories and Their Applications: A Case of Non-Monotonic Reasoning’, in W. Herfel et al. (eds), Theories and Models in Scientific Processes, Rodopi, Amsterdam, pp. 269–293.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schurz, G.: 2001, ‘Pietroski and Rey on Ceteris Paribus Laws’, British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 52, 359–370.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Earman, J., Glymour, C. & Mitchell, S. Editorial. Erkenntnis 57, 277–280 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021536426130

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021536426130

Navigation