Skip to main content

Public Broadcasting in Europe: Rationale, Licence Fee and Other Issues

Abstract

This paper deals with some key issues arising in the current debate in Europeover public sector broadcasting (PSB). It asks what is understood by PSB andexamines critically the arguments for PSB. The latter is done under fiveheadings, namely diversity, democracy/equality, network externalities,innovation and investment and public braodcasting as ``insurance''. The paperthen provides some statistical analysis of the extent, funding and programmemix of Eurepean PSB. Finally it examines in some detail the issues surroundingthe licence fee as an instrument for funding PSB. These include thedetermination of the level of the fee, collection costs and evasion and thefairness of the instrument.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

References

  • ARD/ZDF (eds.) (1997) Was Sie über Rundfunk wissen sollten: Materialien zum Verständnis eines Mediums. VISATAS, Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beebe, J. (1977) “Institutional Structure and Program Choice in Television Markets”. Quarterly Journal of Economics 91, 1 (February): 15-37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berry, T. and Waldfogel, J. (1999). “Public Radio and the United States: Does it Correct Market Failure or Cannibalize Commercial Stations?” Journal of Public Economics 71: 198-211.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boardman, A. and Hargreaves-Heap, S. (1999). “Network Externalities and Government Restrictions on Satellite Broadcasting of Key Sporting Events”. Journal of Cultural Economics 23: 165-179.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, C. (1997) The New Economics of Audio-Visual Production. FT Media & Telecoms/Pearson Professional Ltd.

  • Central Statistics Office (1996) Household Budget Survey 1994-95, Volume 1. Central Statistics Office: Dublin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cowie, C. and Williams, M. (1997) “The Economics of Sports Rights”. Telecommunications Policy 21: 619-634.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davies, G. et al. (1999) The Future Funding of the BBC. Report of the Independent Review Panel. Department of Culture, Media and Sport, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Department of Culture, Media and Sport (DCMS) (2000) The Funding of the BBC. Government Response to the Third Report from the Culture, Media and Sport Committee, Session 1999-2000. (CM 4674). Stationery Office, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Djankov, S., McLiesh, C, Nenova, T., and Shleifer, A. (2000) Who Owns the Media? (Working paper 8288). National Bureau of Economic Research, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doyle, C. (1998) “Programming in a Competitive Broadcasting Market: Entry, Welfare and Regulation”. Information Economics and Policy 10: 23-39.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Broadcasting Union (2000) The Funding of Public Service Broadcasting. Legal Department, DAJ/MW/mp. Grand-Saconnex: European Broadcasting Union.

  • Foster, R. (1992) Public Broadcasters: Accountability and Efficiency. University Press, Edinburgh.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graham, A. and Davies, G. (1997) Broadcasting, Society and Policy in the Multimedia Age. University of Luton Press, Luton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenberg, E. and Barnett, H. (1971) “TV Program Diversity - New Evidence and Old Theories”. American Economic Review (papers and proceedings) 61: 41-57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Larouche, P. (1998) “EC Competition Law and the Convergence of the Telecommunications and Broadcasting Sectors”. Telecommunications Policy 22: 219-242.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levin, H (1971) “Program Duplication, Diversity, and Effective Viewer Choices: Some Empirical Findings”. American Economic Review (papers and proceedings) 61: 81-88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levy, D.A. (2001) Europe's Digital Revolution: Broadcasting Regulation, the EU and the Nation State. Routledge, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moragas Spá, M. de and Garitaonandia Garnacho, C. (eds.) (1995) Decentralization in the Global Market. Television in the Regions, Nationalities and Small Countries of the European Union. John Libbey, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Motta, M. and Polo, M. (1997) “Concentration and Public Policies in the Broadcasting Industry: The Future of Television”. Economic Policy 12: 295-333.

    Google Scholar 

  • Noam, E.M. (1987) “A Public and Private-Choice Model of Broadcasting”. Public Choice 55: 163-187.

    Google Scholar 

  • Papandrea, F. (1997) Cultural Regulation of Australian Television Programs. Australian Government, Canberra.

    Google Scholar 

  • Papandrea, F. (1999) “Willingness to Pay for Domestic Television Programming”. Journal of Cultural Economics 23: 149-166.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rumphorst, W. (1998) “Public Broadcasting: No End to the Misunderstandings?” Diffusion - Quartely Journal of the European Broadcasting Union, Spring 1998: 48-53.

  • Spence, M. and Owen, B. (1997) “Television Programming, Monopolistic Competition andWelfare”. Quarterly Journal of Economics 66: 103-126.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steiner, P. (1952) “Program Patterns and Preferences, and the Workability of Competition in Radio Broadcasting”. Quarterly Journal of Economics 66: 194-223.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waterman, D. (1989/90) “Diversity and Quality of Information Products in a Monopolistically Competitive Industry”. Information Economics and Policy 4: 291-303.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weitzman, M. (1992) “On Diversity”. Quarterly Journal of Economics 107: 363-405.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

O'Hagan, J., Jennings, M. Public Broadcasting in Europe: Rationale, Licence Fee and Other Issues. Journal of Cultural Economics 27, 31–56 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021518601792

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021518601792

  • licence fee
  • programme diversity
  • public sector broadcasting