Advertisement

Behavior Genetics

, Volume 28, Issue 3, pp 227–237 | Cite as

Artificial Selection for Increased Wheel-Running Behavior in House Mice

  • John G. Swallow
  • Patrick A. Carter
  • Theodore GarlandJr.
Article

Abstract

Replicated within-family selection for increased voluntary wheel running in outbred house mice (Mus domesticus; Hsd:ICR strain) was applied with four high-selected and four control lines (10 families/line). Mice were housed individually with access to activity wheels for a period of 6 days, and selection was based on the mean number of revolutions run on days 5 and 6. Prior to selection, heritabilities of mean revolutions run per day (rev/day), average running velocity (rpm), and number of minutes during which any activity occurred (min/day) were estimated by midparent–offspring regression. Heritabilities were 0.18, 0.28, and 0.14, respectively; the estimate for min/day did not differ significantly from zero. Ten generations of selection for increased rev/day resulted in an average 75% increase in activity in the four selected lines, as compared with control lines. Realized heritability averaged 0.19 (range, 0.12–0.24 for the high-activity lines), or 0.28 when adjusted for within-family selection. Rev/day increased mainly through changes in rpm rather than min/day. These lines will be studied for correlated responses in exercise physiology capacities and will be made available to other researchers on request.

Artificial selection correlated response genetic correlation heritability Mus domesticus wheel-running activity 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

REFERENCES

  1. Blizard, D. A. (1983). Sex differences in running-wheel behaviour in the rat: The inductive and activational effects of gonadal hormones. Anim. Behav. 31:378–384.Google Scholar
  2. Bruell, J. H. (1964). Heterotic inheritance of wheel running in mice. J. Comp. Physiol. Psych. 58:159–163.Google Scholar
  3. Bult, A., Van der Zee, E. A., Compaan, J. C., and Lynch, C. B. (1992). Differences in the number of arginine-vasopressin-immunoreactive neurons exist in the suprachiasmatic nuclei of house mice selected for differences in nest-building behavior. Brain Res. 578:335–338.Google Scholar
  4. Bult, A., Hiestand, L., Van der Zee, E. A., and Lynch, C. B. (1993). Circadian rhythms differ between selected mouse lines: A model to study the role of vasopressin neurons in the suprachiasmatic nuclei. Brain Res. Bull. 32:623–627.Google Scholar
  5. Collier, G., and Leshner, A. I. (1967). An invariant in mouse running wheel behavior. Psychon. Sci. 8:9–10.Google Scholar
  6. DeFries, J. C., Gervais, M. C., and Thomas, E. A. (1978). Response to 30 generations of selection for open-field activity in laboratory mice. Behav. Genet. 8:3–13.Google Scholar
  7. DeFries, J. C., Wilson, J. R., and McClearn, G. E. (1970). Open-field behavior in mice: Selection response and situational generality. Behav. Genet. 1:195–211.Google Scholar
  8. Dewsbury, D. A. (1980). Wheel-running behavior in 12 species of muroid rodents. Behav. Process. 6:271–280.Google Scholar
  9. Dohm, M. R. (1994). Quantitative Genetics of Locomotor Performance and Physiology in House Mice (Mus domesticus), Ph.D. dissertation, University of Wisconsin—Madison.Google Scholar
  10. Dohm, M. R., Hayes, J. P., and Garland, T., Jr. (1996). Quantitative genetics of sprint running speed and swimming endurance in laboratory house mice (Mus domesticus). Evolution 50:1688–1701.Google Scholar
  11. Dohm, M. R., Richardson, C. S., and Garland, T., Jr. (1994). Exercise physiology of wild and random-bred laboratory house mice and their reciprocal hybrids. Am. J. Physiol. 267:R1098–R1108.Google Scholar
  12. Falconer, D. S. (1963). Quantitative inheritance. In Burdette, W. J. (ed.), Methodology in Mammalian Genetics, Holden-Day, San Francisco.Google Scholar
  13. Falconer, D. S. (1973). Replicated selection for body weight in mice. Genet. Res. Cambr. 22:291–321.Google Scholar
  14. Friedman, W. A., Garland, T., Jr., and Dohm, M. R. (1992). Individual variation in locomotor behavior and maximal oxygen consumption in mice. Physiol. Behav. 52:97–104.Google Scholar
  15. Garland, T., Jr., and Carter, P. A. (1994). Evolutionary physiology. Annu. Rev. Physiol. 56:579–621.Google Scholar
  16. Harpur, R. P. (1980). The rat as a model for physical fitness studies. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. 66A:553–574.Google Scholar
  17. Hauschka, T. S., and Mirand, E. A. (1973). The “breeder: HA(ICR)” Swiss mouse, a multipurpose stock selected for fecundity. In Murphy, G. P., Pressman, D., and Mirand, E. A. (eds.), Perspectives in Cancer Research and Treatment, Alan R. Riss, New York.Google Scholar
  18. Hayes, J. P., and Garland, T., Jr. (1995). The evolution of endothermy: Testing the aerobic capacity model. Evolution 49:836–847.Google Scholar
  19. Hill, W. G. (1972). Estimation of realized heritabilities from selection experiments. I. Divergent selection. Biometrics 29:747–765.Google Scholar
  20. Hill, W. G., and Rasbash, J. (1986). Models of long term artificial selection in finite population. Genet. Res. Cambr. 48:41–50.Google Scholar
  21. Holloszy, J. O. (1993). Exercise increases average longevity of female rats despite increased food intake and no growth retardation. J. Geront. 48:B97–B100.Google Scholar
  22. Lambert, M. I., and Noakes, T. D. (1990). Spontaneous running increases VO2max and running performance in rats. J. Appl. Physiol. 68:400–403.Google Scholar
  23. Lynch, C. B. (1980). Response to divergent selection for nesting behavior in Mus musculus. Genetics 96:757–765.Google Scholar
  24. Lynch, C. B. (1994). Evolutionary inferences from genetic analyses of cold adaptation in laboratory and wild populations of the house mouse. In Boake, C. R. B. (ed.), Quantitative Genetic Studies of Behavioral Evolution, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
  25. Mather, J. G. (1981). Wheel-running activity: A new interpretation. Mamm. Rev. 11:41–51.Google Scholar
  26. Montgomery, D. C., and Peck, E. A. (1992). Introduction to Linear Regression Analysis, Wiley, New York.Google Scholar
  27. Oliverio, A., Castellano, C., and Messeri, P. (1972). Genetic analysis of avoidance, maze, and wheel-running behaviors in the mouse. J. Comp. Phys. Psych. 79:459–473.Google Scholar
  28. Perrigo, G., and Bronson, F. H. (1985). Sex differences in the energy allocation strategies of house mice. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 17:297–302.Google Scholar
  29. Rodnick, K. J., Reaven, G. M., Haskell, W. L., Sims, C. R., and Mondon, C. E. (1989). Variations in running activity and enzymatic adaptations in voluntary running rats. J. Appl. Physiol. 66:1250–1257.Google Scholar
  30. Rundquist, E. A. (1933). Inheritance of spontaneous activity in rats. J. Comp. Physiol. Psych. 16:415–438.Google Scholar
  31. Swallow, J. G., Garland, T., Jr., Carter, P. A., Zhan, W.-Z., and Sieck, G. C. (1998). Effects of voluntary activity and genetic selection on aerobic capacity in house mice (Mus domesticus). J. Appl. Physiol. 84:69–76.Google Scholar
  32. Walker, C., and Byers, J. A. (1991). Heritability of locomotor play in house mice, Mus domesticus. Anim. Behav. 42:891–897.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1998

Authors and Affiliations

  • John G. Swallow
    • 1
  • Patrick A. Carter
    • 1
  • Theodore GarlandJr.
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of ZoologyUniversity of WisconsinMadison

Personalised recommendations