Skip to main content
Log in

The Implementation of Families First in the Netherlands: A One Year Follow-Up

  • Published:
Child Psychiatry and Human Development Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study examined whether the American family preservation program Families First was successfully implemented in the Netherlands. Data were collected on 250 children of 177 families who received Families First. At the start of treatment 78% of the children appeared to have serious behavioral problems, 67% of the parents experienced a high level of parental stress, and 63% of the children went through a substantial number of life events during the year preceding the treatment. On average the treatments had the intended duration (about 4 weeks), intensity (about 10 hours a week) and availability (during working hours as well as in evenings and in weekends), and family workers did adhere to important guidelines of treatment delivery. One year after treatment 76% of the children were still living at home. Moreover, children's behavioral problems, parental stress and the number of life events turned out to be significantly decreased. It was concluded that Families First had reached its intended target group, delivered the treatment as intended, and achieved its intended outcomes, suggesting a successful implementation in the Netherlands.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Smit M, Knorth EJ, Klomp M: Child and youth care in the Netherlands. Services and developments. Child and Youth Care Forum 26: 311–321, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Blythe BJ, Patterson Salley M, Jayaratne S: A review of intensive family preservation services research. Social Work Research 18: 213–224, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Scannapieco, M: Home-based services program. Effectiveness with at risk families. Children and Youth Services Review16: 363–377, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Van Acker JCA, De Kemp RAT: The Family Project Approach. J Adolesc 20: 419–430, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Weiner A, Kuppermintz H, Guttmann D: Video Home Training (The Orion Project). A short-term preventive and treatment intervention for families with young children. Fam Process33: 441–453, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Kinney J, Haapala D, Booth C: Keeping Families Together. The Homebuilders model. New York: Aldine de Gruyter, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Spanjaard H, Berger M: Families First. Hulp aan gezinnen ter voorkoming van uithuisplaatsing van kinderen. [Families First: Assistance to families to prevent out-of-home placement of children.] Jeugd en Samenleving 12: 720–729, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Rossi PH: Evaluation of Family Preservation Programs. A Report to the Edna Mc-Connell Clark Foundation. Amherst, MA: Social and Demographic Research Institute, University of Massachusetts, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Bath HI, Haapala DA: Family preservation services. What does the outcome of research really tell us? Social Service Review 68: 386–404, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Fraser MW, Nelson KA, Rivard JC: Effectiveness of family preservation services. Social Work Research21: 138–153, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Schuerman JR, Rzepnicky TL, Little JH: Putting Families First. An Experiment in Family Preservation. New York: Aldine de Gruyter, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Wells K, Whittington D: Child and family functioning after intensive family preservation services. Social Service Review 67: 55–83, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Jacobs FH: The five-tiered approach to evaluation: context and inplementation. In Evaluating Family Programs, eds. Weiss, HB, Jacobs, FH. New York: Aldine De Gruyter, 1988, pp. 37–68.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Friedman R: Services and service delivery system for children with serious emotional disorders: issues in assessing effectiveness. In Children's Mental Health Services, Vol. 3., eds. Nixon, CT, Northrup, DA. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 1997, pp. 16–44.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Connell JP, Kubisch AC: Applying a Theory of Change approach to the evaluation of comprehensive community initiatives: progress, prospects and problems. In: New Approaches to Evaluating Community Initiatives, eds. Fulbright-Anderson, K, Kubisch, AC, Connell, JP. Washington, DC: The Aspen Institute, 1998, pp. 15–44.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Achenbach T:. Integrative Guide for the 1991 CBCL/4-18, YSR, and TRF Profiles. Burlington, VT: University of Vermont, Department of Psychiatry, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Verhulst FC, Van der Ende J, Koot HM: Handleiding voor de CBCL/4-18 [Manual of the CBCL/4-18]. Rotterdam: Erasmus Universiteit/ Sophia Kinderziekenhuis, Afdeling Kinder-en Jeugdpsychiatrie, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Wels PMA, Robbroeckx LMH: Handleiding bij de Nijmeegse Vragenlijst voor de Opvoedingssituatie (NVOS) [Manual of the Nijmegen Child-rearing Situation Questionnaire (NCSQ)]. Lisse, the Netherlands: Swets & Zeitlinger, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Coddington RD: The significance of life events as etiologic factors in the diseases of children, II: a study of a normal population. J Psychosom Res 16: 205–213, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Veerman JW, Ten Brink LT, Van der Horst H, Koedoot P: Handleiding Vragenlijst Meegemaakte Gebeurtenissen (2e herziening). [Manual of the Questionnaire of Life Events (2nd rev.)]. Duivendrecht, the Netherlands: Paedologisch Instituut, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Ten Brink LT, Veerman JW, De Kemp, RAT, Berger, M: Implemented as intended? Recording family worker activities in a Families First program, under revision.

  22. Cohen J: Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. 2nd ed. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Scholte EM: Criteria for residential and foster care. International Journal of Child Psychology & Psychiatry 38: 657–666, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Scholte EM: Psychological risk characteristics of children in welfare programs in Holland: the role of risk-factor analysis in the planning of welfare services for children. Childhood. A Global Journal of child research5: 185–205, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  25. De Kemp RAT, Veerman JW Ten Brink LT: The assessment of imminence of risk of placement. Lessons from a Families First program in the Netherlands. Children and Youth Services Review, in press.

  26. Ten Brink LT: De verdere ontwikkeling van kinderen tijdens een periode van klinische jeugdzorg. Status, beloop, prognose [The development of children during a period of clinical youth care]. Doctoral dissertation, Amsterdam, Free University, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Kloosterman MV, Veerman JW: Boddaert Belicht. Eindrapport Interventie-onderzoek Boddaert [Final report of the day treatment intervention study]. Utrecht: VOG, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Kazdin AE: Conduct Disorders in Childhood and Adolescence. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Veerman, J.W., de Kemp, R.A., ten Brink, L.T. et al. The Implementation of Families First in the Netherlands: A One Year Follow-Up. Child Psychiatry Hum Dev 33, 227–244 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021456630670

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021456630670

Navigation