Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Growth, water use efficiency, and proline content of hydroponically grown tomato plants as affected by nitrogen source and nutrient concentration

  • Published:
Plant and Soil Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Tomato plants (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill. cv. Counter) were grown in 12-L polyethylene containers in aerated and CaCO3-buffered nutrient solutions containing different concentrations of complete stock solutions with either nitrate (stock solution N) or ammonium (stock solution A) as the only nitrogen source (X1 = standard concentration with 5 mM NO3 −-N or NH4 +-N, and X3, X5.5, X8 and X11 = 3, 5.5, 8, 11 times the standard concentration), or a mixture of both stock solutions (N:A ratio = 100:0, 75:25, 50:50, 25:75, 0:100) at moderate nutrient concentration (X3). Total dry matter production and fruit dry weight were only slightly affected by increasing nutrient concentration if nitrate was supplied as the sole nitrogen source. Compared to nitrate, ammonium nitrogen caused a decrease in total dry weight (32–86% between X1 and X11), but led to an increase in both total dry weight and fruit dry weight (11% and 30%) at low concentration if supplied in addition to nitrate nitrogen (N:A ratio = 75:25). Dry matter partitioning in plants was affected by the strength of the nutrient solution, but even more by ammonium nitrogen. Fruits accumulated relatively less dry matter than did the vegetative parts of tomato plants when supplied with nutrient solutions containing ammonium as the only nitrogen source (fruit dry weight to total dry weight ratio 0.37 and 0.15 at low and high nutrient concentration), while nitrate nitrogen rather supported an increase in dry matter accumulation in the reproductive organs (fruit dry weight to total dry weight ratio 0.39–0.46). The water use efficiency (WUE) was only slightly affected by the strength of the nutrient solutions containing nitrate nitrogen (2.9–3.4 g DW (kg H2O)−1), while ammonium nitrogen led to a decrease in WUE from 2.4 to 1.3 g DW (kg H2O)−1at low (X1) and high (X11) nutrient concentration, respectively. The proline content of leaves fluctuated (0.1–5.0 μmol (g fresh weight)−1) according to nutrient concentration and global radiation, and reflected enhanced sensitivity of plants to these potential stress factors if ammonium was the predominant N source supplied. It was concluded, that proline is a reliable indicator of the environmental stress imposed on hydroponically grown tomato plants.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adler P R, Wilcox G E and Markhart A H 1996 Ammonium decreases muskmelon root system hydraulic conductivity. J. Plant Nutr. 19, 1395–1403.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aspinall D and Paleg L G 1981 Proline accumulation: Physiological aspects. In The Physiology and Biochemistry of Drought Resistance in Plants. Eds. L G Paleg and D Aspinall. pp 205–241. Academic Press, Sydney, New York, London, Toronto, San Francisco.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barker A V and Mills H A 1980 Ammonium and nitrate nutrition of horticultural crops. Hort. Rev. 2, 395–423.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barker A V, Volk R J and Jackson W A 1966 Root environment acidity as a regulatory factor in ammonium assimilation by the bean plant. Plant Physiol. 41, 1193–1199.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bloom A J, Jackson L E and Smart D R 1993 Root growth as a function of ammonium and nitrate in the root zone. Plant Cell Environ. 16, 199–206.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bodapati P N, Aspinall D and Paleg L G 1992 Variability in prolineaccumulating ability of barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) cultivars induced by vapour pressure deficit. Plant Physiol. 98, 716–722.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourgeaisy-Chaillou P, Perez-Alfocea F and Guerrier G 1992 Comparative effects of N-sources on growth and physiological responses of soybean exposed to NaCl-stress. J. Exp. Bot. 43, 1225–1233.

    Google Scholar 

  • Britto D T, Siddiqi M Y, Glass A D M and Kronzucker H J 2001 Futile transmembrane NH4 + cycling: A cellular hypothesis to explain ammonium toxicity in plants. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. (PNAS) 98, 4255–4258.

    Google Scholar 

  • Büssis D and Heineke D 1998 Acclimation of potato plants to polyethylene glycol-induced water deficit. II. Contents and subcellular distribution of organic solutes. J. Exp. Bot. 49, 1361–1370.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chaillou S, Vessey J K, Morot-Gaudry J F, Raper Jr C D, Henry L T and Boutin J P 1991 Expression of characteristics of ammonium nutrition as affected by pH of the root medium. J. Exp. Bot. 42. 189–196.

    Google Scholar 

  • Claussen W and Lenz F 1995 Effect of ammonium and nitrate on net photosynthesis, flower formation, growth and yield of eggplants (Solanum melongena L.). Plant Soil 171, 267–274.

    Google Scholar 

  • Claussen W and Lenz F 1999 Effect of ammonium or nitrate nutrition on net photosynthesis, growth, and activity of the enzymes nitrate reductase and glutamine synthetase in blueberry, raspberry and strawberry. Plant Soil 208, 95–102.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cramer M D and Lips S H 1995 Enriched rhizosphere CO2 concentrations can ameliorate the influence of salinity on hydroponically grown tomato plants. Physiol. Plant. 94, 425–432.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cruz C, Lips S H and Martins-Loucao M A 1993 Growth and nutrition of carob plants as affected by nitrogen sources. J. Plant Nutr. 16, 1–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Delauney A J and Verma D P S 1993 Proline biosynthesis and osmoregulation in plants. Plant J. 4, 215–223.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elia A, Santamaria P and Serio F 1996 Ammonium and nitrate in-fluence on artichoke growth rate and uptake of inorganic ions. J. Plant Nutr. 19, 1029–1044.

    Google Scholar 

  • Errebhi M and Wilcox G E 1990 Plant species response to ammonium-nitrate concentration rations. J. Plant Nutr. 13, 1017–1029.

    Google Scholar 

  • Findenegg G R 1987 A comparative study of ammonium toxicity at different constant pH of the nutrient solution. Plant Soil 103, 239–243.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerendás J and Sattelmacher B 1990 Influence of nitrogen from and concentration on growth and ionic balance of tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum) and potato (Solanum tuberosum). In Plant Nutrition-Physiology and Applications. Ed. M L van Beusichem. pp 33–37. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerendás J, Zhu Z, Bendixen R, Ratcliffe R G and Sattelmacher B 1997 Physiological and biochemical processes related to ammonium toxicity in higher plants. Z. Pflanzenern. Bodenk. 160, 239–251.

    Google Scholar 

  • Givan C V 1979 Metabolic detoxification of ammonia in tissues of higher plants. Phytochemistry 18, 375–382.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guerrier G 1998 Proline accumulation in salt-treated tomato: Different proline precursors in Lycopersicon esculentum and Lycopersicon pennellii. J. Plant Nutr. 21, 505–513.

    Google Scholar 

  • Handa S, Handa A K, Hasegawa P M and Bressan R A 1986 Proline accumulation and the adaptation of cultured plant cells to water stress. Plant Physiol. 80, 938–945.

    Google Scholar 

  • Handa S, Bressan R A, Handa A K and Carpita N C 1983 Solutes contributing to osmotic adjustment in cultured plant cells adapted to water stress. Plant Physiol. 73, 834–843.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hare P D and Cress W A 1997 Metabolic implications of stressinduced proline accumulation in plats. Plant Growth Regul. 21, 79–102.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haynes R J and Goh K M 1978 Ammonium and nitrate nutrition of plants: Biol. Rev 53, 465–510.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heuer B 1994 Osmoregulatory role of proline in water-and saltstressed plants. In Handbook of Plant and Crop Stress. Ed. M Pessarakli. pp 363–381. Marcel Dekker, New York, Basel, Hong Kong.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ho L C 1996 Tomato. In Photoassimilate Dstribution in Pants and Cops. Eds. E Zamski and A A Schaffer. pp 709–728. Marcel Dekker, New York, Basel, Hong Kong.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hogh-Jensen H and Schjoerring J K 1997 Effects of drought and inorganic N form on nitrogen fixation and carbon isotope discrimination in Trifolium repens. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 35, 55–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ieperen van W 1996 Effects of different day and night salinity levels on vegetative growth, yield and quality of tomato. J. Hort. Sci. 71, 99–111.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jain R K, Dhawan R S, Sharma D R and Chowdhury J B 1987 Salttolerance and proline accumulation: A comparative study in salttolerant and wild type cultured cells of eggplant. Plant Cell Rep. 6, 382–384.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kandlbinder A, da Cruz C and Kaiser W M 1997 Response of primary plant metabolism to the N-source. Z. Pflanzenern. Bodenk. 160, 269–274.

    Google Scholar 

  • Khan M G, Silberbush M and Lips S H 1994 Physiological studies on salinity and nitrogen interaction in alfalfa. II. Photosynthesis and transpiration. J. Plant Nutr. 17, 669–682.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kishor P B K, Hong Z, Miao G H, Hu Ch A A and Verma D P S 1995 Overexpression of ? 1-pyrroline-5-carboxylate synthetase increases proline production and confers osmotolerance in transgenic plants. Plant Physiol. 108, 1387–1394.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kiyosue T, Yoshiba Y, Yamaguchi-Shinozaki K and Shinozaki K 1996 A nuclear gene encoding mitochondrial proline dehydrogenase, an enzyme involved in proline metabolism, is upregulated by proline but downregulated by dehydration in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 8, 1323–1335.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis O A M, Leidi E O and Lips S H 1989 Effect of nitrogen source on growth response to salinity stress in maize and wheat. New Phytol. 111, 155–160.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis O A M, Cramer M and van der Leij T 1990 Influence of nitrogen source on carbon distribution in plants exhibiting the C3 and C4 photosynthetic pathways. In Inorganic Nitrogen in Plants and Microorganisms. Eds. W R Ullrich, C Rigano, A Fuggi and P J Aparicio. pp 229–355. Springer Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lips S H, Leidi E O, Silberbush M, SoAres M I M and Lewis O E M 1990 Physiological aspects of ammonium and nitrate fertilization. J. Plant Nutr. 13, 1271–1289.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lorenz H 1975 Free amino acids in tomato plants in relation to form and concentration of nitrogen in the rooting medium. Plant Soil 45, 163–168.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lutts S, Majerus V and Kinet J-M 1999 NaCl effects on proline metabolism in rice (Oryza sativa) seedlings. Physiol. Plant. 105, 450–458.

    Google Scholar 

  • Magalhaes J R and Wilcox G E 1984 Growth, free amino acids, and mineral composition of tomato plants in relation to nitrogen form and growing media. J. Am. Soc. Hor. Sci. 109, 406–411.

    Google Scholar 

  • Magalhaes J R and Wilcox G E 1984 Ammonium toxicity development in tomato plants relative to nitrogen form and light intensity. J. Plant Nutr. 7, 1477–1496.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martínez-Carrasco R, Pérez P, Handley L L, Scrimgeour S C, Igual M, Martín Del Molino I and Sánchez De La Puente L 1998 Regulation of growth, water use efficiency and ? 13C by the nitrogen source in Casuarina equisetifolia Forst. & Forst. Plant Cell Environ. 21, 531–534.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maynard D N and Barker A V 1969 Studies on the tolerance of plants to ammonium nutrition. J. Am. Soc. Hort. Sci. 94. 235–239.

    Google Scholar 

  • Osaki M, Shirai J, Shinano T and Tadano T 1995 15N allocation of 15NH4-N and 15NO3-N to nitrogenous compounds at the vegetative growth stage of potato plants. Soil Sci. Plant Nutr. 41, 699–708.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pérez-Alfocea F, Estan M T, Santa Cruz A and Bolarin M C 1993 Effects of salinity on nitrate, total nitrogen, soluble protein and free amino acid levels in tomato plants. J. Hort. Sci. 68, 1021–1027.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pérez-Alfocea F, Estan M T, Caro M and Guerrier G 1993 Osmotic adjustment in Lycopersicon esculentum and L. pennellii under NaCl and polyethylene glycol 6000 iso-osmotic stresses. Physiol. Plant. 87, 493–498.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peuke A D and Jeschke W D 1993 The uptake and flow of C, N and ions between roots and shoots in Ricinus communis L. 1. Grown with ammonium or nitrate as nitrogen source. J. Exp. Bot. 44, 1167–1176.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pill W G and Lambeth V N 1977 Effects of NH4 and NO3 nutrition with and without pH adjustment on tomato growth, ion composition, and water relations. J. Am. Soc. Hort. Sci. 102, 78–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raab T K and Terry N 1995 Carbon, nitrogen, and nutrient interactions in Beta vulgaris L. as influenced by nitrogen source, NO3? versus NH4+. Plant Physiol. 107, 575–584.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raven J A, Wollenweber B and Handley L L 1992 A comparison of ammonium and nitrate as nitrogen sources for photolithotrophs. New Phytol. 121, 19–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raven J A and Sprent J I 1993 Nitrogen assimilation and its role in plant water relations. In Water Deficits. Plant Responses from Cell to Community. Eds. J A C Smith and H Griffiths, pp 205–219. Bios Scientific Publishers, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salsac L, Chaillou S, Morot-Gaudry J-F, Lesaint C H and Jolivet E 1987 Nitrate and ammonium nutrition in plants. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 25, 805–812.

    Google Scholar 

  • Samaras Y, Bressan R A, Csonka L N, García-Ríos MG, Paino D'Urzo M and Rhodes D 1995 Proline accumulation during drought and salinity. In Environment and Plant Metabolism. Ed. N Smirnoff. pp 161–187. Bios Scientific Publishers, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strizhov N, Abraham E, Ökrész L, Blickling S, Zilberstein A, Schell J, Koncz C and Szabados L 1997 Differential expression of two P5CS genes controlling proline accumulation during salt-stress requires ABA and is regulated by ABA1, ABI1 and AXR2 in Arabidopsis. Plant J. 12, 557–569.

    Google Scholar 

  • Verbruggen N, Villarroel R and van Montagu M 1993 Osmoregulation of a pyrroline-5-carboxylate reductase gene in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Physiol. 103, 771–781.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiesler F 1997 Agronomical and physiological aspects of ammonium and nitrate nutrition of plants. Z. Pflanzenern. Bodenk. 160, 227–238.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yin Z H and Raven J A 1998 Influences of different nitrogen sources on nitrogen-and water-use efficiency, and carbon isotope discrimination in C3 Triticum aestivum L. and C4 Zea mays L. plants. Planta 205, 574–580.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institut für Gemüse- und Zierpflanzenbau Großbeeren/Erfurt, Theodor-Echtermeyer-Weg, 14979, Großbeeren, Germany

    W. Claussen

Authors
  1. W. Claussen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Claussen, W. Growth, water use efficiency, and proline content of hydroponically grown tomato plants as affected by nitrogen source and nutrient concentration. Plant and Soil 247, 199–209 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021453432329

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021453432329

Search

Navigation