Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The Effects of Different Property Models in a Computational Fluid Dynamics Simulation of a Reciprocating Compressor

  • Published:
International Journal of Thermophysics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Computational fluid dynamics was applied to model a simple reciprocating compressor using R134a (1,1,1,2-tetrafluoroethane) as the working fluid. The sensitivity of the compressor model to various property models was quantitatively assessed by calculating the work required to carry out several compression cycles. The ideal gas equation, a virial equation using only the second virial coefficient, and the Peng–Robinson equation were compared to a reference-quality Helmholtz energy equation of state. Significant errors, up to 12% in the density of the outflowing gas, can result from the use of the ideal gas model. The Peng–Robinson equation resulted in density errors up to 6.3%. The virial equation gave values closest to those calculated using the Helmholtz energy equation of state, with errors in density up to 4.7%. The results also show that an increase in accuracy in work and mass flow calculations achieved by using the Helmholtz energy equation of state is obtainable without an impractical increase in computation time.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. M. J. Assael, L. Karagiannidis, S. M. Richardson, and W. A. Wakeham, Int. J. Thermophys. 13:223 (1992).

    Google Scholar 

  2. J. J. Healy, J. J. de Groot, and J. Kestin, Physica 82:392 (1976).

    Google Scholar 

  3. B. A. Younglove and M. O. McLinden, J. Phys. Chem. Ref. Data 23:731 (1994).

    Google Scholar 

  4. A. R. H. Goodwin and M. R. Moldover, J. Chem. Phys. 93:2741 (1990).

    Google Scholar 

  5. J. M. Smith and H. C. Van Ness, Introduction To Chemical Engineering Thermodynamics, 3rd ed. (McGraw-Hill, New York, 1975).

    Google Scholar 

  6. D. Y. Peng and D. B. Robinson, I.E.C. Fund. 15:59 (1976).

    Google Scholar 

  7. R. Tillner-Roth and H. D. Baehr, J. Phys. Chem. Ref. Data 23:657 (1994).

    Google Scholar 

  8. M. O. McLinden and S. A. Klein, Proc. 6th Int. Refrig. Conf. (Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, 1996), p. 409.

    Google Scholar 

  9. A. P. Peskin and G. R. Hardin, Comput. Chem. Eng. 20:1043 (1996).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Physical and Chemical Properties Division, National Institute of Standards and Technology, 325 Broadway, Boulder, Colorado 80303, U.S.A

    A. P. Peskin

Authors
  1. A. P. Peskin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Peskin, A.P. The Effects of Different Property Models in a Computational Fluid Dynamics Simulation of a Reciprocating Compressor. International Journal of Thermophysics 20, 175–185 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021442616990

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021442616990

Search

Navigation