Skip to main content

Development and Validation of the Physical Disability Sexual and Body Esteem Scale

Sexuality and Disability volume 20, pages 159–176 (2002)Cite this article

Abstract

The Physical Disability Sexual and Body Esteem (PDSBE) scale was developed to assess respondents' capacity to feel positive about their sexuality and their body while living with a physical impairment. The current paper presents four studies that were conducted to develop and assess the psychometric properties of the 10 item PDSBE scale. The first study was an exploratory factor analysis involving 348 participants with physical disabilities. The factors were: Sexual Esteem, Attractiveness to Others, and Body Esteem. The second study was a confirmatory factor analysis, with a total of 338 participants. This analysis confirmed the factor structure established in study 1. The third study revealed good test-retest reliability on a total of 47 participants with physical disabilities. The final study was conducted with 748 participants with physical disabilities and showed that the PDSBE had high reliability and good convergent and divergent validity. Mean scores showed that women scored significantly higher than men on the total PDSBE scale and on the Sexual Esteem and Attractiveness to Others subscales. Future applications for the PDSBE scale are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Access options

Buy single article

Instant access to the full article PDF.

39,95 €

Price includes VAT (Finland)

REFERENCES

  1. Snell WE Jr, Fisher TD, Walters AS: The Multidimensional Sexuality Questionnaire: An objec-tive self-report measure of psychological tendencies associated with human sexuality. Ann Sex Res 6:27-55, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Mayer JD, Eisenberg MG: Mental representation of the body: Stability and change in response to illness and disability. Rehabil Psychol 33:155-171, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bach J, Bardach J: Neuromuscular disease. In ML Sipski, CJ Alexander (eds). Sexual function in people with disability and chronic illness: A health professional's guide. Maryland: Aspen Publisher, 1997, pp. 247-258.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Cromer BA, Enrile B, McCoy K, Gerhardstein MJ, Fitzpatrick M, Judis J: Knowledge, atti-tudes and behavior related to sexuality in adolescents with chronic disability. Dev Med Child Neurol 32:602-610, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Donelson E: The relationship of sexual self-concept to the level of spinal cord injury and other factors. Dissertation Abstracts International Section B: The Sciences and Engineering 58:6805, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Kettl P, Zarefoss S. Jacoby K, Garman C, Hulse C, Rowley F, Corey R, Sredy M, Bixler E, Tyson K: Female sexuality after spinal cord injury. Sex Disabil 9:287-295, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Lawrence B: Self-concept formation and physical handicap: some educational implication for integration. Disabil Handicap Soc 6:139-146, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Mona L, Gardos P, Brown R: Sexual self views of women with disabilities. The relationship among age-of-onset, nature of disability and sexual self-esteem. Sex Disabil 12:261-277, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Romeo AJ, Wanlass R, Arenas S: A profile of psychosexual functioning in males following spinal cord injury. Sex Disabil 11:269-276, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Silvers B: Sexuality, early-onset physical disability, and sense of coherence. Dissertation Ab-stracts International Section B: The Sciences and Engineering 57:7743, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Taleporos G: Sexuality and physical disability. In C Wood (ed). Sexual positions: An Australian view. Melbourne: Hill of Content Publishing, 2001, pp. 55-166.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Taleporos G, McCabe MP: Physical disability and sexual esteem. Sex Disabil 19:131-148, 2001a.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Taleporos G, McCabe MP: Physical disability and body esteem, Sex Disabil 19:293-308, 2001b.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Taleporos G, McCabe MP: Body image and physical disability-Personal perspectives. Soc Sci Med 54:971-980, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Wolman C, Resnick M, Harris L, Blum R: Emotional well-being among adolescents with and without chronic conditions. J Adolesc Health 15:199-204, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Franzoi S, Shields S: The Body Esteem Scale: Multidimensional structure and sex differences in a college population. J Pers Assess 48:173-178, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Snell W, Papini D: The Sexuality Scale: An instrument to measure sexual-esteem, sexual-depression, and sexual-preoccupation. J Sex Res 26:256-263, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Shuttleworth R: The search for sexual intimacy for men with Cerebral Palsy. Sex Disabil 18:263-282, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Knight SE: Sexual concerns of the physically disabled. In B Heller, L Flohr, L Zegans (eds). Psychosocial interventions with physically disabled persons: Mind and medicine. New Jersey: Rutgers University Press, 1983, pp. 183-199.

    Google Scholar 

  20. McCabe MP, Cummins R, Decks A: Sexuality and quality of life among people with physical disability. Sex Disabil 18:123-131, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Page RC, Cheng HP, Pate TC, Mathus B et al: The perceptions of spinal cord injured persons toward sex. Sex Disabil 8:112-132, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Rintala DH, Howland CA, Nosek MA, Bennett JL, Young ME, Foley CC, Rossi CD, Chanpong G: Dating issues for women with physical disabilities. Sex Disabil 15:219-242, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Rousso H: Special considerations in counselling clients with cerebral palsy. Sex Disabil 5:78-88, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Stone SD: The myth of bodily perfection. Disabil Soc 10:413-424, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Teal JC, Athelstan GT: Sexuality and spinal cord injury: Some psychosocial considerations. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 56:264-268, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Wendell S: The rejected body: Feminist philosophical reflections on disability. New York: Routledge, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Arbuckle JL, Wothke W: Amos 4.0 users guide. Chicago, IL: Small Waters Corporation, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Carmines EG, McIver JP: Analysing models with unobserved variables. In GW Bohrnstedt, EF Borgatta (eds). Social measurement: Current issues. Beverley Hills: Sage, 1981, pp. 65-115.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Browne MW, Cudeck R: Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In KA Bollen, JS Long (eds). Testing structural equation models. California: Sage, 1993, pp. 136-162.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Bentler PM, Bonnet DG: Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures. Psychol Bull 88: 588-606, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Browne MW, Mels G: RAMONA user's guide. Ohio: The Ohio State University, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Cochran WG: The χ2 test and goodness of fit. Ann Math Stat 23: 315-345, 1952.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Gulliksen H, Tukey JW: Reliability for the law of comparative judgement. Psychometrica 23:95-110, 1958.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Lovibond P, Lovibond A: The structure of negative emotional states: comparison of the Depression Anxiety Stress Scales (DASS) with the Beck Depression and Anxiety Inventories. Beh Res Ther 33:335-343, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Rosenberg M: Society and the adolescent self-image. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1965.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Silbert E, Tippett J: Self-esteem: Clinical assessment and measurement validation. Psychol Rep 16:1017-1071, 1965.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Wiederman M, Allgeier E: The measurement of sexual-esteem: Investigation of Snell and Papini's (1989) Sexuality Scale. J Res Personal 27:88-102, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Jahanshahi M, Marsden CD: Body concept, disability, and depression in patients with spasmodic torticollis. Behav Neurol 3:117-131, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Erikson D, Erikson L: Knowledge of sexuality in adolescents with Spina Bifida. Can J Human Sexual 1:195-199, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Tepper M: Living with a disability: A man's perspective. In ML Sipski, CJ Alexander (eds). Sexual function in people with disability and chronic illness: A health professional's guide. Maryland: Aspen Publisher, 1997, pp. 131-141.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Tepper M: Letting go of restrictive notions of manhood: Male sexuality, disability and chronic illness. Sex Disabil 17:37-52, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Psychology, Deakin University, Australia

    George Taleporos

  2. School of Psychology, Deakin University, 221 Burwood Highway, Burwood, Victoria, 3125, Australia

    Marita P. McCabe

Authors
  1. George Taleporos
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Marita P. McCabe
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Taleporos, G., McCabe, M.P. Development and Validation of the Physical Disability Sexual and Body Esteem Scale. Sexuality and Disability 20, 159–176 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021441631385

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021441631385

  • physical disability
  • body esteem
  • sexual esteem
  • development of scale