Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Tim W. Clark, The Policy Process: A Practical Guide for Natural Resource Professionals / Tim W. Clark, Andrew R. Willard, and Christina M. Cromley, eds., The Foundations of Natural Resource Policy and Management

  • Published:
Policy Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Ascher, W. (1999). Why governments waste natural resources. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ascher, W. and R. Healy (1990). Natural resource policymaking in developing countries. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Auer, M. A. (1998). ‘Agency reform as decision process: The reengineering of the Agency for International Development,’ Policy Sciences31: 81–105.

    Google Scholar 

  • Auer, M. A. (2000). ‘Who participates in global environmental governance? Partial answers from international relations theory,’ Policy Sciences33: 155–180.

    Google Scholar 

  • Auer, M. A. (2001). ‘Energy and environmental politics in post-corporatist Mexico,’ Policy Studies Journal29: 437–455.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brechin, S. R., P. R. Wilshusen, C. L. Fortwangler, and P. C. West (2002). ‘Beyond the square wheel: Toward a more comprehensive understanding of biodiversity conservation as a social and political process,’ Society and Natural Resources15: 41–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brewer, G. D. and T. W. Clark (1994). ‘A policy sciences perspective: Improving implementation,’ in T. W. Clark, R. P. Reading and A. L. Clarke, eds., Endangered Species Recovery: Finding the Lessons, Improving the Process. Covelo, CA: Island Press, pp. 391–416.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brunner, R. D. (1991). ‘Global climate change: defining the policy problem,’ Policy Sciences24: 291–311.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brunner, R. D. and T. W. Clark (1997). ‘A practice-based approach to ecosystem management,’ Conservation Biology11: 48–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, T. W. (1996). ‘Learning as a strategy for improving endangered species conservation,’ Endangered Species Update13 (1/2): 5–6, 22–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, T. W. (1997). ‘Conservation biologists in the policy process: Learning to be practical and e!ective,’ in G. K. Meffe and C. R. Carroll, eds., Principles of Conservation Biology, Sunderland, MA: Sinauer Associates, Inc., pp. 575–598.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, T. W., E. D. Amato, D. G. Whittemore, and A. H. Harvey (1991). ‘Policy and programs for ecosystem management in the Greater Yellowstone ecosystem: An analysis,’ Conservation Biology5: 412–422.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, T. W. and J. R. Cragun (1994). ‘Organizational and managerial guidelines for endangered species restoration programs and recovery teams,’ in M. L. Bowles and C. J. Whelan, eds., Restoration of endangered species, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 9–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, T. W., A. P. Curlee, and R. P. Reading (1996). ‘Crafting effective solutions to the large carnivore conservation problem,’ Conservation Biology10: 940–948.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, T. W. and A. H. Harvey (1991). ‘Implementing recovery policy: Learning as we go?’ in K. A. Kohm, ed., Balancing on the Brink of Extinction: The Endangered Species Act and Lessons for the Future, Covelo, CA: Island Press, pp. 147–165.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, T. W. and R. P. Reading (1994). ‘A professional perspective: Improving problem solving, communication, and effectiveness,’ in T. W. Clark, R. P. Reading and A. L. Clarke, eds., Endangered Species Recovery: Finding the Lessons, Improving the Process, Covelo, CA: Island Press, pp. 351–370.

    Google Scholar 

  • deLeon, P. and T. A. Steelman (1999). ‘The once and future public policy program,’ Policy Currents9 (2): 1–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steelman, T. A. and W. Ascher (1997). ‘Public involvement methods in natural resource policy making: Advantages, disadvantages, and trade-offs,’ Policy Sciences30: 71–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steelman, T. A. and R. L. Wallace (2001). ‘Property rights and property wrongs: Why context matters in fisheries management,’ Policy Sciences34: 357–379.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallace, R. L. (in press) ‘social influences on conservation: Lessons from U.S. marine mammal recovery programs,’ Conservation Biology.

  • Wilshusen, P. R., SR. Brechin, C. L. Fortwangler, and P. C. West (2002), ‘Reinventing a square wheel: Critique of a resurgent “protection paradigm” in international biodiversity conservation,’ Society and Natural Resources15: 17–40.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors
  1. Richard L. Wallace
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wallace, R.L. Tim W. Clark, The Policy Process: A Practical Guide for Natural Resource Professionals / Tim W. Clark, Andrew R. Willard, and Christina M. Cromley, eds., The Foundations of Natural Resource Policy and Management . Policy Sciences 35, 325–330 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021398929564

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021398929564

Search

Navigation