Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Maximum Weights of Handling Acceptable to People Aged 55–74 Years: Part I. Lifting

  • Published:
Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The primary objective of this work was to investigate dynamic psychophysical (acceptable) material handling strengths (capabilities) of an older population (aged 55–74 years; n = 20). The findings are presented in two parts. Part I deals with manual lifting capabilities; Part II deals with manual carrying capabilities. In order to determine dynamic psychophysical strengths, routine everyday tasks were simulated in the laboratory. Lifting activities simulating work-related tasks included eight sequences of lifting (two lifting heights × four lifting frequencies); for each sequence, the maximum acceptable weight of lift (MAWL) was determined. Psychophysical lifting strengths of a younger population (18–35 years; n = 20) were also determined to find how the MAWL of the older population differed from that of the younger population. In addition to the MAWL, a number of responses at the MAWL were recorded: heart rate (HR), oxygen uptake (VO2), and category-ratio ratings of perceived exertion (CRRPE). The results indicated no practically significant age-related differences in responses between either the older and younger males, or older and younger females. Based on the limited data collected in this study, it appears that age has no significant influence on people's capability to lift loads. Consequences of these findings on design are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. Larsson L, Karlsson J. Isometric and dynamic endurance as a function of age and skeletal muscle characteristics. Acta Physiol Scand 1978; 104: 129–136.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Astrand PO, Rodhal K. Textbook of work physiology (3rd Ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Baker, S, Harvey A. Fall injuries in the elderly. Clin Geriat Med 1985; 1: 501.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Whipple R, Wolfson L, Amerman P. The relationship of knee and ankle weakness to falls in nursing home residents: an isokinetic study. J Am Geriat 1987; 35: 13–20.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Bassey E, Bendall M, Pearson M. Muscle strength in the triceps surae and objectivity measured customary walking activity in men and women over 65 years of age. Clin Sci 1988; 74: 85–89.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Wickman C, Cooper C, Margetts B, Barker D. Activity, housing and the risks of fall in elderly people. Age Ageing 1989; 18: 47–51.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Buchner D, Koepsell T, Abrass I. Leg muscle strength and hip fracture risk. Gerontologist 1990; 30: 77–78B.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Mital A. Issues and concerns in accommodating the elderly in the workplace. J Occup Rehab 1994; 4: 253–268.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Fillenbaum G. Screening the elderly: A brief instrumental activities of daily living measure. J. Am. Geriat. Soc. 1985; 33: 698–706.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Lawton M. The impact of the environment on aging behavior. In: Birren J, Schaie KW, eds. Handbook of Psychology of Aging. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Faletti M. Human factors research and functional environments for the aged. In: Altman I, Lawton MP, Wohlwill JF, eds. Elderly People and the Environment. New York: Plenum, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Davies C, White M, Young K. Electrically evoked and voluntary maximal isometric tension in relation to dynamic muscle performance in elderly male subjects aged 69 years. Eur J Appl Physiol 1983; 51: 37–43.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Mital A. Maximum weight of lift acceptable to male and female industrial workers for extended workshifts. Ergonomics 1984; 27: 1115–1126.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Snook SH, Ciriello VM. The design of material handling tasks: revised tables of maximum acceptable weights and forces. Ergonomics 1991; 34: 1197–1213.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Wright U, Mital A. Is there a need for psychophysical strength studies of the aged? J Occup Rehab 1997; 7: 53–60.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Borg G. An introduction to Borg's RPE-Scale. Ithaca, NY: Movement Publications, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Mital A, Nicholson AS, Ayoub MM. A guide to manual materials handling. London, UK: Taylor & Francis, Ltd., 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Roebuck J. Anthropometric methods: Designing to fit the human body. Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Ayoub MM, Mital A. Manual materials handling. London, UK: Taylor & Francis, Ltd., 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Founooni-Faard H. A Psychophysical Study of High and Very High Frequency Manual Materials Handling. PhD dissertation, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Snook SH. The design of material handling tasks. Ergonomics 1978; 12: 963–985.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Mital A. Comprehensive maximum weights of lift for regular 8-hour work shifts. Ergonomics 1984; 27: 1127–1138.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wright, U.R., Mital, A. Maximum Weights of Handling Acceptable to People Aged 55–74 Years: Part I. Lifting. J Occup Rehabil 9, 3–13 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021385230426

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021385230426

Navigation