Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Social Exchange and Emotional Investment in Work Groups

  • Published:
Motivation and Emotion Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study applied a social exchange perspective to examine three related aspects of work group behavior: individuals' assessment of the personal costs and rewards of group membership, the overall level of emotional investment in a group, and the external evaluation of group performance. Regression analyses of survey data from 28 ongoing student work groups (134 individuals) indicated that perceptions of personal rewards resulting from interaction over a ten-week period are an important precursor of emotional investment, defined as a relational orientation that encourages mutual caring, group loyalty, and commitment to the group as a whole. Consistent with our expectations, personal costs influenced neither emotional investment nor group performance after considering the effects of personal rewards. Emotional investment mediated the effects of personal rewards on externally rated group performance. Thus, emotional investment was a pivotal dimension of group effectiveness. Results extend our understanding of group behavior by acknowledging the relationship between personal and group development while confirming the compelling role of emotions in social exchange.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Altman, I., & Taylor, D. A. (1973). Social penetration: The development of interpersonal relationships. New York: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Argote, L., & McGrath, J. E. (1993). Group processes in organizations: Continuity and change. In C. L. Cooper & L. T. Robertson (Eds.), International review of industrial and organizational psychology (Vol. 8, pp. 333–389). New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173–1182.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barsade, S. G., & Gibson, D. E. (1998). Group emotion: A view from the top and bottom. Research on Managing Groups and Teams, 1, 81–102.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berscheid, E. (1983). Emotion. In H. H. Kelley et al. (Eds.), Close relationships (pp. 110–168). New York: Freeman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berscheid, E. (1985). Interpersonal attraction. In G. Lindzey & E. Aronson (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (Vol. 2). New York: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berscheid, E., Snyder, M., & Omoto, A. (1989). The relationship closeness inventory: Assessing the closeness of interpersonal relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 792–807.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blau, P. (1964). Exchange and power in social life. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Braiker, H., & Kelley, H. H. (1979). Conflict in the development of close relationships. In R. L. Burgess & T. L. Huston (Eds.), Social exchange in developing relationships (pp. 135–167). New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brewer, M. B. (1991). The social self: On being the same and different at the same time. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 17, 475–482.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bui, K.-V. T., & Peplau, L. A., & Hill, C. T. (1996). Testing the Rusbult model of relationship commitment and stability in a 15-year study of heterosexual couples. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 22, 1244–1257.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, M. S., & Mills, J. (1979). Interpersonal attraction in exchange and communal relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 12–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, M. S., & Mills, J. (1993). The difference between communal and exchange relationships: What is and is not. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 19, 684–691.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clore, G. L., & Byrne, D. (1974). A reinforcement-affect model of attraction. In T. L. Huston (Ed.), Foundations of interpersonal attraction (pp. 143–170). New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins, W. A., & Repinski, D. (1991). Development of relationships during the transition to adolescence: Processes of adaptation to individual change. Paper presented at the biennial meeting of the Society for Research in Child Development, Seattle, WA.

  • Daft, R. L. (1998). Organization theory and design (6th ed.). Cincinnati, OH: South-Western.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daft, R. L., & Sharfman, M. P. (1995). Organization theory: Cases and applications (4th ed.). St. Paul: West Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, J. H., Zarnoth, P., Hulbert, L., Chen, X.-P., Parks, C., & Nam, K. (1997). The committee charge, framing interpersonal agreement, and consensus models of group quantitative judgment. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 72, 137–157.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drisgotas, S. M., & Rusbult, C. E. (1992). Should I stay or should I go? A dependence model of breakups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 62, 62–87.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edmondson, A. C. (1996). Learning from mistakes is easier said than done: Group and organizational influences on the detection and correction of human error. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 32, 5–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eidelson, R. J. (1980). Interpersonal satisfaction and level of involvement: A curvilinear relationship. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39, 460–470.

    Google Scholar 

  • Emerson, R. M. (1972). Exchange theory. Part I: A psychological basis for social exchange. In J. Berger, M. Zelditch, & B. Anderson (Eds.), Sociological theories in progress (Vol. 2). Boston: Houghton Mifflin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Emerson, R. M. (1987). Toward a theory of value in social exchange. In K. S. Cook (Ed.), Social exchange theory (pp. 11–46). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foa, U. G., & Foa, E. B. (1974). Social structures of the mind. Springfield, IL: Charles C. Thomas.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gabarro, J. J. (1978). The development of trust, influence, and expectations. In A. G. Athos & J. J. Gabarro (Eds.), Interpersonal behavior. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gabarro, J. J. (1987). The development of working relationships. In J. Lorsch (Ed.), Handbook of organizational behavior (pp. 172–189). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gersick, C. J. G. (1988). Time and transition in work teams: Toward a new model of group development. Academy of Management Journal, 31, 9–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gersick, C. J. G. (1989). Marking time: Predictable transitions in task groups. Academy of Management Journal, 32, 274–309.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gouldner, A. W. (1960). The norm of reciprocity. American Sociological Review, 25, 165–167.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guzzo, R. A., & Dickson, M. W. (1996). Teams in organizations: Recent research on performance and effectiveness. Annual Review of Psychology, 47, 307–338.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guzzo, R. A., & Shea, G. P. (1992). Group performance and intergroup relations in organizations. In M. D. Dunnette & L. M. Hough (Eds.), Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology (2nd. ed.) (pp. 269–313). Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hackman, J. R. (1982). A set of methods for research on work teams (Tech. Rep. No. 1). New Haven, CT: Yale University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hackman, J. R. (1987). The design of work teams. In J. W. Lorsch (Ed.), Handbook of organizational behavior (pp. 315–341). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hackman, J. R. (Ed.) (1990). Groups that work (and those that don't): Creating conditions for effective teamwork. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hackman, J. R. (1992). Group influences on individuals in organizations. In M. D. Dunnette & L. M. Hough (Eds.), Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology (2nd. ed.) (pp. 199–267). Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hackman, J. R., & Oldham, G. R. (1980). Work redesign. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartup, W. W., & Stevens, N. (1997). Friendship and adaptation in the life course. Psychological Bulletin, 121, 355–370.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, J. H., & Omarzu, J. (1997). Minding the close relationship. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 1, 224–240.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hatfield, E., Cacioppo, J. T., & Rapson, R. L. (1992). Primitive emotional contagion. In M. S. Clark (Ed.), Review of personality and social psychology: Emotion and social behavior (Vol. 14, pp. 151–177). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hays, R. B. (1984). The development and maintenance of friendship. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 1, 75–98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hays, R. B. (1985). A longitudinal study of friendship development. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48, 909–924.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holmes, J. G., & Rempel, J. K. (1989). Trust in close relationships. In C. Hendrick (Ed.), Close relationships: Review of personality and social psychology (Vol. 10, pp. 187–220). Newberry Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Homans, G. (1958). Social behavior as exchange. American Journal of Sociology, 63, 597–606.

    Google Scholar 

  • Homans, G. (1974). Social behavior: Its elementary forms (rev. ed.). New York: Harcourt, Brace, & Jovanovich.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huston, T. L., & Burgess, R. L. (1979). Social exchange in developing relationships. In R. L. Burgess & T. L. Huston (Eds.), Social exchange in developing relationships (pp. 3–28). New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • James, K., & Cropanzano, R. (1994). Dispositional group loyalty and individual action for the benefit of an ingroup: Experimental and correlational evidence. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 60, 179–205.

    Google Scholar 

  • James, L. R., & Brett, J. M. (1984). Mediators, moderators, and tests for mediation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 69, 212–220.

    Google Scholar 

  • James, L. R., Demaree, R. G., & Wolf, G. (1984). Estimating within-group interrater reliability with and without response bias. Journal of Applied Psychology, 69, 85–98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Janis, I. L. (1982). Groupthink (2nd ed.). Boston: Houghton Mifflin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, M. D. (1996). To succeed, work teams should benefit members and companies. USA Today, Feb. 28.

  • Kelley, H. H. (1979). Personal relationships: Their structures and processes. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelley, H. H., & Thibaut, J. W. (1978). Interpersonal relations: A theory of interdependence. New York: Wiley-Interscience.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelley, J. R., & McGrath, J. E. (1985). Effects of time limits and task types on task performance and interaction of four-person groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49, 395–406.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kenny, D. A., & LaVoie, L. (1985). Separating individual and group effects. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48, 339–448.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knapp, M., & Vangelisti, A. L. (1991). Interpersonal communication and human relationships (2nd ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Konovsky, M. A., & Pugh, S. D. (1994). Citizenship behavior and social exchange. Academy of Management Journal, 37, 656–669.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawler, E. J. (1992). Affective attachments to nested groups: A choice-process theory. American Sociological Review, 57, 327–339.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawler, E. J., & Yoon, J. (1996). Commitment in exchange relations: A theory of relational cohesion. American Sociological Review, 61, 89–208.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levinger, G. (1974). A three-level approach to attraction: Toward an understanding of pair relatedness. In T. L. Huston (Ed.), Foundations of interpersonal attraction. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levinger, G. (1980). Toward the analysis of close relationships. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 16, 510–544.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levinger, G., & Snoek, J. D. (1972). Attraction in relationship: A new look at interpersonal attraction. Morristown, NJ: General Learning.

    Google Scholar 

  • Littlepage, G., Robison, W., & Reddington, K. (1997). Effects of task experience and group experience on group performance, member ability, and recognition of expertise. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 69, 133–147.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lydon, J. E., Jamieson, D. W., & Holmes, J. G. (1997). The meaning of social interactions in the transition from acquaintanceship to friendship. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 536–548.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGrath, J. E. (1984). Groups: Interaction and performance. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGrath, J. E. (1991). Time, interaction, and performance (TIP): A theory of groups. Small Group Research, 22, 147–174.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGrath, J. E. (1997). Small group research, that once and future field: An interpretation of the past with an eye to the future. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 1, 7–27

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, R. S. (1997). Inattentive and contented: Relationship commitment and attention to alternatives. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 758–766.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parsons, T. (1951). The Social System. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pelham, B. W., & Wachssmuth, J. O. (1995). The waxing and waning of the social self: Assimilation and contrast in social comparison. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 825–838.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reis, H. T., & Patrick, B. C. (1996). Attachment and intimacy: Component processes. In E. T. Higgins & A. Kruglanski (Eds.), Social psychology: Handbook of basic principles (pp. 523–563). New York: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rousseau, D. M. (1995). Psychological contracts in organizations: Understanding written and unwritten agreements. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rusbult, C. E. (1983). A longitudinal test of the investment model. The development and deterioration of satisfaction and commitment in heterosexual involvements. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 22, 1244–1257.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rusbult, C., & Buunk, B. P. (1993). Commitment processes in close relationships: An interdependence analysis. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 10, 175–204.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rusbult, C., & Martz, J. M. (1995). Remaining in an abusive relationship: An investment model analysis of nonvoluntary dependence. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21, 558–571.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sandelands, L. E., & St. Clair, L. (1993). Toward an empirical concept of group. Journal for the Theory of Social Behavior, 23, 423–458.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schlesinger, L. A., Eccles, R. G., and Gabarro, J. J. (1983). Managing behavior in organizations: Text, cases, readings. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Secord, P. F., & Backman, C. W. (1964). Social psychology. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Settoon, R. P., Bennett, N., & Liden, R. C. (1996). Social exchange in organizations: Perceived organizational support, leader-member exchange, and employee reciprocity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 81, 219–227.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, K. G., Smith, K. A., Olian, J. D., Sims, H. P., O'Bannon, D. P., & Scully, J. A. (1994). Top management team demography and process: The role of social integration and communication. Administrative Science Quarterly, 39, 412–438.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sternberg, R. (1986). A triangular theory of love. Psychological Review, 93, 119–135.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sundstrom, E., De Meuse, K. P., & Futrell, D. (1990). Work teams: Applications and effectiveness. American Psychologist, 45, 120–133.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tallman, I., Gray, L., & Leik, R. L. (1991). Decisions, dependency and commitment: An exchange based theory of group formation. In E. J. Lawler, B. Markovsky, C. Ridgeway, & H. A. Walker (Eds.), Advances in group processes (Vol. 8, pp. 227–257). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thibaut, J., & Kelley, H. H. (1959). The social psychology of groups. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wageman, R. (1995). Interdependence and group effectiveness. Administrative Science Quarterly, 40, 145–180.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walster, E., Walster, G. W., & Berscheid, E. (1978). Equity theory and research. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walton, R. E., & Hackman, J. R. (1986). Groups under contrasting management strategies. In J. P. Goodman (Ed.), Designing effective work groups (pp. 168–201). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Psychology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, 48109-1109

    Richard Saavedra

Authors
  1. Richard Saavedra
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Linn Van Dyne
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Saavedra, R., Van Dyne, L. Social Exchange and Emotional Investment in Work Groups. Motivation and Emotion 23, 105–123 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021377028608

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021377028608

Keywords

Search

Navigation