Skip to main content
Log in

Common Questions Regarding the Use of Phallometric Testing with Sexual Offenders

  • Published:
Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment

Abstract

Research on phallometric assessment has accumulated in recent years. This research can inform and enhance the use of phallometric measures of sexual preferences among sexual offenders. In this short essay we suggest empirical answers to common clinical questions regarding the application of this technology.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Association for the Treatment of Sexual Abusers (1993). The ATSA Practioner's Handbook. Lake Oswego, OR: ATSA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barbaree, H. E., & Mewhort, D. J. K. (1994). The effects of the z-score transformation on measures of relative erectile response strength: A re-appraisal. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 32, 547-558.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barsetti, I., Earls, C. M., & Lalumière, M. L. (1998). The differentiation of intrafamilial and extrafamilial heterosexual child molesters. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 13, 275-286.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chaplin, T. C., Rice, M. E., & Harris, G. T. (1995). Salient victim suffering and the sexual responses of child molesters. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 63, 249-255.

    Google Scholar 

  • Earls, C. M., & Castonguay, L. G. (1989). The evaluation of olfactory aversion for a bisexual pedophile with a single-case multiple baseline design. Behavior Therapy, 20, 137-146.

    Google Scholar 

  • Earls, C. M., Quinsey, V. L., & Castonguay, L. G. (1987). A comparison of three methods of scoring penile circumference changes. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 16, 493-500.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freund, K., & Blanchard, R. (1989). Phallometric diagnosis of pedophilia. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 57, 100-105.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freund, K., & Costell, R. (1970). The structure of erotic preference in the nondeviant male. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 8, 15-20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freund, K., Watson, R., & Rienzo, D. (1988). Signs of feigning in the phallometric test. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 26, 105-112.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freund, K., Watson, R., & Dickey, R. (1991). Sex offenses against female children perpetrated by men who are not pedophiles. Journal of Sex Research, 28, 409-423.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanson, R. K., & Bussière, M. T. (in press). Predicting relapse: A meta-analysis of sexual offender recidivism studies. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology.

  • Harris, G. T., & Rice, M. E. (1996). The science in phallometric testing of men's sexual preferences. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 5, 156-160.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, G. T., Rice, M. E., Quinsey, V. L., Chaplin, T. C., & Earls, C. (1992). Maximizing the discriminant validity of phallometric assessment data. Psychological Assessment, 4, 502-511.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, G. T., Rice, M. E., Quinsey, V. L., & Chaplin, T. C. (1996). Viewing time as a measure of sexual interest among child molesters and normal heterosexual men. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 34, 389-394.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howes, R. J. (1995). A survey of plethysmographic assessment in North America. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 7, 9-24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunter, J. A., Goodwin, D., & Becker, J. V. (1994). The relationship between phallometrically measured deviant sexual arousal and clinical characteristics in juvenile sexual offenders. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 32, 533-538.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lalumière, M. L., & Earls, C. M. (1992). Voluntary control of penile responses as a function of stimulus duration and instructions. Behavioral Assessment, 14, 121-132.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lalumière, M. L., & Quinsey, V. L. (1993). The sensitivity of phallometric measures with rapists. Annals of Sex Research, 6, 123-138.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lalumière, M. L., & Quinsey, V. L. (1994). The discriminability of rapists from non-sex offenders using phallometric measures: A meta-analysis. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 21, 150-175.

    Google Scholar 

  • Proulx, J., Cote, G., & Achille, P. A. (1993). Prevention of voluntary control of penile response in homosexual pedophiles during phallometric testing. Journal of Sex Research, 30, 140-147.

    Google Scholar 

  • Proulx, J., Aubut, J., McKibben, A., & Cote, M. (1994). Penile response of rapists and nonrapists to rape stimuli involving physical violence or humiliation. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 23, 295-310.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quinsey, V. L., & Bergersen, S. G. (1976). Instructional control of penile circumference. Behavior Therapy, 7, 489-493.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quinsey, V. L., & Chaplin, T. C. (1988a). Penile responses of child molesters and normals to descriptions of encounters with children involving sex and violence. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 3, 259-274.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quinsey, V. L., & Chaplin, T. C. (1988b). Preventing faking in phallometric assessments of sexual preference. In R. A. Prentky & V. L. Quinsey (Eds.) Human sexual aggression: Current perspectives (pp. 49-58). New York: Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quinsey, V. L., & Lalumière, M. L. (1996). Assessment of sexual offenders against children. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quinsey, V. L., Chaplin, T. C., & Varney, G. (1981). A comparison of rapists' and non-sex offenders' sexual preferences for mutually consenting sex, rape, and physical abuse of women. Behavioral Assessment, 3, 127-135.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quinsey, V. L., Lalumière, M. L., Rice, M. E., & Harris, G. T. (1995). Predicting sexual offenses. In J. C. Campbell (Ed.), Assessing dangerousness: Violence by sexual offenders, batterers, and child abusers (pp. 114-137). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quinsey, V. L., Rice, M. E., & Harris, G. T. (1995). Actuarial prediction of sexual recidivism. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 10, 85-105.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rice, M. E., & Harris, G. T. (1997). Why do some men commit incest? Paper presented at the Annual Forensic Conference, Midland, Ontario, Canada, June.

  • Rice, M. E., Harris, G. T., & Quinsey, V. L. (1990). A followup of rapists assessed in a maximum security psychiatric facility. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 5, 435-448.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rice, M. E., Quinsey, V. L., & Harris, G. T. (1991). Sexual recidivism among child molesters released from a maximum security psychiatric institution. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 59, 381-386.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rice, M. E., Chaplin, T. C., Harris, G. T., & Coutts, J. (1994). Empathy for the victim and sexual arousal among rapists and nonrapists. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 9, 435-449.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seto, C. M., Lalumière, M. L., & Kuban, M. (1997). The sexual preferences of incest offenders (manuscript submitted for publication).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lalumière, M.L., Harris, G.T. Common Questions Regarding the Use of Phallometric Testing with Sexual Offenders. Sex Abuse 10, 227–237 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021369904984

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021369904984

Navigation