Skip to main content
Log in

Emissions Rights and their Transferability: Equity Concerns over Climate Change Mitigation

  • Published:
International Environmental Agreements Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Existing literature on equity considerations for climate change mitigation has largely focused on fair burden-sharing at an inter-national level without adequate attention to equity concerns at the intra-national level. However, disparities between regions and income groups within nations pose perhaps more equity concerns over climate change mitigation than those between nations. While international equity can be agreed upon via political negotiation among nations, the poor in both developed and developing countries may not be guaranteed their fair allocation of emissions rights because the necessary institutional framework has yet to be established at both international and national levels. This paper distinguishes three parts of emissions rights and discusses their transferability in view of equity concerns. The author suggests that basic necessity emissions rights are not transferable and non-necessity emissions are fully marketable, while individual contributions to state are subject to collective decision-making or political manipulation at the international level. The exact share of each of the three parts is subject to further investigation, but unlimited free trading of emissions rights is likely to result in equity concerns at both inter- and intra-national levels. Further examination in quantitative terms would represent an interesting case study for a better understanding of the issue.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Agarwal, A. and S. Narain (2000), 'How Poor Nations can Help to Save the World', in M. Munasinghe and R. Swart (eds.), Climate Change and its Linkages with Development, Equity, and Sustainability. Proceedings of the IPCC Expert Meeting held in Colombo, Sri Lanka, 27–29 April 1999. LIFE/RIVM/World Bank, pp. 191–214.

  • Albin, C. (1995), 'Rethinking Justice and Fairness: The Case of Acid Rain Emission Reduction', International Affairs 21(2), 119–143.

    Google Scholar 

  • Banuri, T., K. Goran-Maler, M. Grubb, H. K. Jacobson, and F. Yamin (1996), 'Equity and Social Considerations', in James P. Bruce, Horsang Lee and Erik F. Haites (eds.), Climate Change 1995: Economic and Social Dimensions of Climate Change. Contribution of Working Group III to the Second Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 83–124.

    Google Scholar 

  • Banuri, T., J. Weyant, G. Akumu, A. Najam, L-P. Rosa, S. Rayner, W. Sachs, R. Sharma and G. Yohe (2001), 'Setting the Stage: Climate Change and Sustainable Development', in B. Metz, O. Davidson, R. Swart and J. Pan (eds.), Climate Change 2001: Mitigation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Global Commons Institute (1997), Contraction and Convergence: A Global Solution to a Global Problem. July. London, UK: Global Commons Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Houghton, J., Y. Ding and D. Griggs (eds.) (2001), Climate Change 2001: The Scientific Basis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hourcade, J.-C., P. Shukla, L. Cifuentes, D. Davis, B. Fisher, A. Golub, O. Hohmeyer, A. Krupnick, S. Kverndokk, R. Loulou, R. Richels, E. Fortin, H. Seginovic and K. Yamaji (2001), 'Global, Regional and National Costs and Ancillary Benefits of Mitigation', in B. Metz, O. Davidson, R. Swart and J. Pan (eds.), Climate Change 2001: Mitigation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change), 1996. Climate Change 1995: economic and social dimensions of climate change. Contribution of Working Group III to the Second Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • IPCC (2000), Special Report on Emissions Scenarios. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Metz, B., O. Davidson, R. Swart and J. Pan (eds.) (2001), Climate Change 2001: Mitigation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mueller, B. (2001), Fair Compromise in a Morally Complex World. Paper presented at the Pew Conference on Equity and Global Climate Change. Washington DC, 17–18 April, 2001. http://www.pewclimate.org/events/

  • Munasinghe, M. (2000), 'Development, Equity and Sustainability in the Context of Climate Change', in M. Munasinghe and R. Swart (eds.), Climate Change and its Linkages with Development, Equity, and Sustainability. Proceedings of the IPCC Expert Meeting held in Colombo, Sri Lanka, 27–29 April 1999. LIFE/RIVM/World Bank.

  • Rayner, S. and E. L. Malone (2000), 'Climate Change, Poverty, and Intragenerational Equity at National Level', in M. Munasinghe and R. Swart (eds.), Climate Change and its Linkages with Development, Equity, and Sustainability. Proceedings of the IPCC Expert Meeting held in Colombo, Sri Lanka, 27–29 April 1999. LIFE/RIVM/World Bank.

  • Rawls, J. (1971), A Theory of Justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rose, A., B. Stevens, J. Edmonds and M. Wise (1998), 'International Equity and Differentiation in Global Warming Policy: An Application to Tradable Emission Permits', Environmental and Resource Economics 12(1), 25–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sandel, M. J. (1982), Liberalism and the Limits of Justice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schokkaert, E. and J. Eyckmans (1999), 'Greenhouse Negotiations and the Mirage of Partial Justice', in M. H. Dore and T. D. Mount (eds.), Global Environmental Economics: Equity and the Limits to Markets. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers, pp. 193–217.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sidiqi, T. A. (1995), 'Energy Inequities Within Developing Countries: An Important Concern in Global Environmental Change Debate', Global Environmental Change 5, 44–454.

    Google Scholar 

  • Statistical Bureau of China (1999), China Statistical Yearbook. China Statistics Press.

  • Taylor, P. W. (1986), Respect for Nature: A Theory of Environmental Ethics. New Jersey: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Toth, F. (ed.) (1999), Fair Weather? Equity Concerns in Climate Change. London: Earthscan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Toth, F., M. Mwandosya, C. Carraro, J. Christensen, J. Edmonds, C. Gay-Garcia, H. Lee, K. Meyer-Abich, E. Nikitina, A. Rahman, R. Richels, R. Ye, Y. Wake and J. Weyant (2001), Decision Making Frameworks', in B. Metz, O. Davidson, R. Swart and J. Pan (eds,), Climate Change 2001: Mitigation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • UNFCCC (United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change) (1998), Framework Convention on Climate Change. Bonn.

  • UNFCCC (1998), Kyoto Protocol. Bonn World Bank (2000), World Development Report, 2000/1. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Pan, J. Emissions Rights and their Transferability: Equity Concerns over Climate Change Mitigation. International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics 3, 1–16 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021366620577

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021366620577

Navigation