Skip to main content
Log in

Assessing the Readability of Mental Health Internet Brochures for Children and Adolescents

  • Published:
Journal of Child and Family Studies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We investigated the readability of seven mental health brochures on mental, emotional, and behavioral disorders in children that were selected from a website developed by the Center for Mental Health Services at http://www.mentalhealth.org. The reading grade levels of the brochures ranged from 11.1 to 14.8 (mean 13.23), considerably higher than the 8th grade level recommended for educational material by the U. S. Department of Education (1986). On other readability variables, assessed using the Readability Assessment Instrument (RAIN; Singh, 1994), all brochures met criterion on most variables but failed on those for new words (audience appropriateness) and print size. This is a favorable result in comparison with other studies that have assessed readability of mental health information on the Internet using the RAIN, although less so with reading grade levels.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adkins, A. D., Elkins, E. N., & Singh, N. N. (2001). Readability of NIMH Easy-to-Read patient education materials. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 10, 279-285.

    Google Scholar 

  • Adkins, A. D. & Singh, N. N. (2001). Reading level and readability of patient education materials in mental health. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 10, 1-8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Adkins, A. D., Singh, N. N., McKeegan, G, F., Lanier, A. E., & Oswald, D. P. (2002). Behavior treatment programs, readability and treatment outcomes. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 23, 253-265.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Albright, J., de Guzman, C., Acebo, P., Paiva, D., Faulkner, M., & Swanson, J. (1996). Readability of patient education materials: Implications for clinical practice. Applied Nurse Research, 9, 139-143.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berland, G. K., Elliott, M. N., Morales, L. S., Algazy, J. I., Kravitz, R. L., Broder, M. S., Kanouse, D. E., Munoz, J. A., Puyol, J., Lara, M., Watkins, K. E., Yang, H., & McGlynn, E. A. (2001). Health information on the Internet: Accessibility, quality, and readability in English and Spanish. The Journal of the American Medical Association, 285, 2612-2638.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dollahite, J., Thompson, C., & McNew, R. (1996). Readability of printed sources of diet and health information. Patient Education and Counseling, 27, 123-134.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Doak, L. G., & Doak, C. C. (1987). Lowering the silent barriers to compliance for patients with low literacy skills. Promoting Health, 8, 6-8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Estey, A., Musseau, A., & Keehn, L. (1994). Patient's understanding of health information: A multihospital comparison. Patient Education and Counseling, 24, 73-78.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Glanz, K., & Rudd, J. (1990). Readability and content analysis of print cholesterol education materials. Patient Education and Counseling, 16, 109-118.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Graber, M. A., Roller, C. M., & Kaeble, B. (1999). Readability levels of patient education material on the World Wide Web. The Journal of Family Practice, 48, 58-61.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Horner, S. D., Surratt, D., & Juliusson, S. (2000). Improving readability of patient education materials. Journal of Community Health Nursing, 17, 15-23.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, S. T. (1999). Adults performing at the two lowest literacy levels. In U. S. Department of Education. National Center for Education Statistics. Adult literacy and education in America: Four studies based on the national adult literacy survey, NCFS 1999–469 [On-line]. Available: www.nces.ed.gov/pubs2001/2001534.pdf

  • Kirkpatrick, M. F., & Mohler, C. (1999). Using the readability assessment instrument to evaluate medication leaflets. Drug Information Journal, 33, 557-563.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richardson, J. S., & Morgan, R. F. (1994). Reading to learn in the content areas. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Publishing Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh, J. (1994). RAIN: Readability Assessment Instrument Manual. Midlothian, VA: Woodlake Institute for Human Services.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh, J. (1995). The readability of education materials written for parents of children with attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 4, 207-218.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh, J. (2000). The readability of HIV/AIDS education materials. AIDS Education and Prevention, 12, 214-224.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Slaten, D., Parrott, R., & Steiner, C. (1999). Readability of skin cancer prevention brochures targeting parents of young children. Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology, 40, 997-999.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, H., Gooding, S., Brown, R., & Frew, A. (1998). Evaluation of readability and accuracy of information leaflets in general practice for patients with asthma. British Medical Journal, 317, 264-265.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • United States Department of Education. (1986). Digest of Education Statistics (1985–1986). Washington, DC: Office of Educational Research and Improvement, United States Department of Education Center for Statistics.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

King, M.M., Winton, A.S. & Adkins, A.D. Assessing the Readability of Mental Health Internet Brochures for Children and Adolescents. Journal of Child and Family Studies 12, 91–99 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021362210470

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021362210470

Navigation