Skip to main content

A wireless communication system for determining site fidelity of juvenile dusky groupers Epinephelus marginatus (Lowe, 1834) using coded acoustic transmitters

Abstract

The value of marine reserves to protect threatened and vulnerable species, such as the dusky grouper (Epinephelus marginatus), is often uncertain because of a lack of knowledge about their ecology and habitat utilisation. To address this issue, a Wireless Communication System for location-based positioning of fish tagged with coded acoustic transmitters was installed to determine site fidelity of juvenile dusky groupers (mean total length = 30.4 cm, range: 20.5–40.0 cm; mean total weight = 470 g, range: 113–950 g) within a marine reserve (Island of Ustica, Sicily, Italy). The system was based on five wireless hydrophones distributed approximately 200 m apart along the coastline of the reserve, each monitoring acoustic signals from transmitters within a reception cell. The hydrophones retransmitted detected signals as a radio signal to a land-based receiver and data logger. Unique identifiers for each hydrophone permitted the identification of the detection cell containing the tagged fish. The wireless hydrophones had partly overlapping detection ranges, dividing the marine reserve into more than five different detection cells. The average detection range was 232 m, but coverage varied from site to site and with time, depending on many factors, such as ambient noise, wave action and signal strength of the transmitters. Despite some limitations, the Wireless Hydrophone System (WHS) combined with manual tracking provided a valuable tool for investigating site fidelity in the dusky grouper. Preliminary home ranges for the fish were estimated by the kernel method (probability level of 95%), based on a limited set of manual tracking data, to be a median 5312 m2 (range 1673–18626 m2).

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

References

  1. Bégout Anras, M. L., S. Kadri, J. E. Juell & T. Hansen, 2000. Measuring individual and group swimming behaviour under production densities: Test of a 3D multiple fish acoustic positioning system in a sea cage. In Moore, A. & I. Russel (eds), Advances in Fish Telemetry, CEFAS, Lowestoft, UK: 75-78.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bolden, S. K., 2000. Long-distance movement of a Nassau grouper (Epinephelus striatus) to a spawning aggregation in the central Bahamas. Fish. Bull. 98: 642-645.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bouain, A. & Y. Siau, 1983. Observations on the female reproduction cycle and fecundity of the species of groupers (Epinephelus) from the southeast Tunisian seashores. Mar. Biol. 73: 211-220.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bruslé, J., 1985. Exposé synoptique des données biologiques sur les mérous Epinephelus aeneus (Geoffroy Saint Hilaire, 1809) et Epinephelus guaza (Linnaeus, 1758) de Océan Atlantique et de la Mediterranée. FAO Synopsis sur les Pêches 129: 64 pp.

  5. Chauvet, C., 1988. Etude de la croissance du mérou Epinephelus guaza des côtes tunisiennes. Aquat. Living Resour. 1: 277-288.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Chauvet, C., G. Barnabé, J. Bayle Sempere, C. H. Biaconi, J. L. Binche, P. Francour, A. Garcia Rubies, J. G. Harmelin, R. Miniconi, A. Pais & P. Robert, 1991. Recensement due merou Epinephelus guaza (Linnaeus, 1758) dans le reserves et parcs marins des cotes mediterraneennes francaises. In Boudouresque, C. F., M. Avon & V. Gravez (eds), Les espèces Marines à Protéger en Méditerranée. GIS Posidonie Publ., Fr. 34: 277-290.

  7. Kimley, A. P., F. Voegeli, S. C. Beavers & B. J. LeBoeuf, 1998. Automated listening stations for tagged marine fishes.Mar. Tech. Soc. J. 32: 94-101.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Lacroix, G. L. & F. A. Voegeli, 2000. Development of automated monitoring systems for ultrasonic transmitters. In Moore, A. & I. Russel (eds), Advances in Fish Telemetry, CEFAS, Lowestoft, UK: 37-50.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Lawson, E. J. G. & A. R. Rodgers, 1997. Differences in home-range size computed in commonly used software programs. Wildlife Soc. Bull. 25: 721-729.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Lembo, G., I. A. Fleming, F. Økland, P. Carbonara, S. Ragonese & M. T. Spedicato, 1998. Design of a telemetry study for the dusky grouper (Epinephelus marginatus, Lowe 1834). Biol. mar. Medit. 5: 1258-1265.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Lembo, G., I. A. Fleming, F. Økland, P. Carbonara & M. T. Spedicato, 1999a. Homing behaviour and site fidelity of Epinephelus marginatus around the island of Ustica: preliminary results from a telemetry study. Biol. mar. Medit. 6: 90-99.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Lembo, G., I. A. Fleming, F. Økland, P. Carbonara & M. T. Spedicato, 1999b. Site fidelity of the dusky grouper, Epinephelus marginatus (Lowe, 1834), studied by hydroacoustic telemetry. Mar. Life 9: 37-43.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Marino, G., E. Azzurro, A. Massari, M. G. Finoia & A. Mandich, 2001. Reproduction in the dusky grouper from the southern Mediterranean. J. Fish Biol. 58: 909-927.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Neill, J. R., 1967. Observations on the behaviour of the grouper species Epinephelus guaza and Epinephelus alexandrinus (Serranidae). Underwat. Assoc. Rep. 1966-1967: 101-106.

  15. Økland, F., B. Finstad, R. S. McKinley, E. B. Thorstad & R. K. Booth, 1997. Radio-transmitted electromyogram signals as indicators of physical activity in Atlantic salmon. J. Fish Biol. 51: 476-488.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Økland, F., E. Thorstad, G. Lembo, S. Ragonese & M. T. Spedicato, 1999. Surgery procedures for implanting telemetry transmitters into the body cavity of Epinephelus marginatus (Lowe, 1834). Biol. mar. Medit. 6: 139-143.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Palumbi, S. R., 2001. The ecology of marine protected areas. In Bertness, M. D., S. D. Gaines & M. E. Hay (eds), Marine Community Ecology. Sinauer, Sunderland, MA, USA: 509-530.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Priede, I. G. & S. M. Swift, 1992.Wildlife Telemetry: RemoteMonitoring and Tracking of Animals. Ellis Horwood Ltd., New York: 708 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Roberts, C. M., 1997. Ecological advice for the global fisheries crisis. Trends Ecol. Evol. 12: 35-38.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Seaman, D. E. & R. A. Powell, 1996. An evaluation of the accuracy of kernel density estimators for home range analysis. Ecology 77: 2075-2085.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Stasko, A. B. & D. E. Pincock, 1977. Review of underwater biotelemetry with emphasis on ultrasonic techniques. J. Fish Res. Bd Can. 34: 1262-1285.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Thorstad, E. B., F. Økland, D. Rowsell & R. S. McKinley, 2000. A new system for automatic recording of fish tagged with coded acoustic transmitters. Fish. Manage. Ecol. 7: 281-294.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Vacchi, M., S. Bussotti, P. Guidetti & G. La Mesa, 1999. Le cernie della riserva marina di Ustica: osservazioni preliminari sulla struttura delle popolazioni e comportamento sociale. Biol. mar. Medit. 6: 278-280.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Worton, B. J., 1989. Kernel methods for estimating the utilization distribution in home range studies. Ecology 70: 164-168.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Zabala, M., P. Louisy, A. Gracia-Rubies & V. Gracia, 1997. Sociobehavioural context of reproduction in the Mediterranean dusky grouper Epinephelus marginatus (Lowe, 1834) (Pisces, Serranidae) in the Medes Islands Marine Reserve (NW Mediterranean, Spain). Sci. Mar. 61: 79-89.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to G. Lembo.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lembo, G., Spedicato, M.T., Økland, F. et al. A wireless communication system for determining site fidelity of juvenile dusky groupers Epinephelus marginatus (Lowe, 1834) using coded acoustic transmitters. Hydrobiologia 483, 249–257 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021360419150

Download citation

  • telemetry
  • wireless communication system
  • two-dimensional positioning
  • Epinephelus marginatus
  • dusky grouper
  • site fidelity
  • home range
  • marine reserve