Abstract
Fernandes and Simon propose to examine decision making in complex and ambiguous situations by inviting various professionals (architects, doctors, engineers, and lawyers) to contemplate a paradoxical case, but the thoughts which this exercise generates are then summarized in terms of categories proposed a priori (structural information). A functional approach, by way of contrast, endeavors to examine a phenomenon as closely as possible in terms of its intrinsic character. An alternative is presented using Q methodology and factor analysis as a way to reveal functional responses to the same decision making scenario employed by Fernandes and Simon.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Almond, G. A. (1960). ‘A functional approach to comparative politics,’ in G. A. Almond and J. S. Coleman, eds., The Politics of the Developing Areas. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, pp. 3–64.
Bion, W. R. (1965). Transformations. New York: Basic Books.
Brown, S. R. (1980). Political Subjectivity: Applications of Q Methodology in Political Science. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Cade, R. B. (1975). ‘Lasswell's three functions: Toward a theory of mass communication,’ Southern Quarterly14, 41–52.
Devlin, K. (1998). The Language of Mathematics: Making the Invisible Visible. New York: Freeman.
Dollard, J. (1935). Criteria for the Life History. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Ekeland, I. (1993). The Broken Dice, and other Mathematical Tales of Chance (C. Volk, Trans.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Fernandes, R. and H. A. Simon (1999). ‘A study of how individuals solve complex and ill-structured problems,’ Policy Sciences32, 225–245.
Hempel, C. G. (1959). ‘The logic of functional analysis,’ in L. Gross, ed., Symposium on Sociological Theory. Evanston. IL: Row, Peterson, pp. 271–307.
Holmberg, A. R. (1969). ‘Dynamic functionalism,’ in A. A. Rogow, ed., Politics, Personality, and Social Science in the Twentieth Century: Essays in Honor of Harold D. Lasswell. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp. 261–295.
Holton, G. (1973). Thematic Origins of Scientific Thought. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Jones, B. D. (2001). Politics and the Architecture of Choice: Bounded Rationality and Governance. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Kantor, J. R. (1947). Problems of Physiological Psychology. Bloomington, IN: Principia Press.
Lasswell, H. D. (1930). Psychopathology and Politics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Lasswell, H. D. (1948). ‘The structure and function of communication in society,’ in L. Bryson, ed., The Communication of Ideas. New York: Institute for Religious and Social Studies, pp. 37–51.
Lasswell, H. D. (1956). The Decision Process: Seven Categories of Functional Analysis. College Park: Bureau of Governmental Research, University of Maryland.
Lasswell, H. D. (1961). ‘The qualitative and the quantitative in political and legal analysis,’ in D. Lerner, ed., Quantity and Quality. New York: Free Press of Glencoe, pp. 103–116.
Lasswell, H. D. (1963). The Future of Political Science. New York: Atherton Press.
Lasswell, H. D. and A. Kaplan (1950). Power and Society: A Framework for Political Inquiry. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Lasswell, H. D. and M. S. McDougal (1971). ‘Criteria for a theory about law,’ Southern California Law Review44, 362–394.
Lasswell, H. D. and M. S. McDougal (1992). Jurisprudence for a Free Society: Studies in Law, Science and Policy(2 Vols.). Dordrecht: Martinus Nijhoff.
Lewin, K. (1931). ‘The conflict between Aristotelian and Galileian modes of thought in contemporary psychology,’ Journal of General Psychology5, 141–177.
MacKay, D.M. (1969). Information, Mechanism and Meaning. Cambridge, MA: M.I.T. Press.
Malinowski, B. (1960). A Scientific Theory of Culture. NewYork: Oxford University Press.
March, J. G. and H. A. Simon (1958). Organizations. New York: Wiley.
Menand, L. (2001). The Metaphysical Club. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
Newton, I. (1934). Mathematical Principles of Natural Philosophy(Third Edition) (A. Motte [1729] and F. Cajori [1934], Trans.). Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press. (Original work published 1729)
Piaget, J. (1970). Structuralism(C. Maschler, Trans.). New York: Basic Books.
Radcliffe-Brown, A. R. (1952). Structure and Function in Primitive Society. London: Cohen & West.
Reisman, W.M. (1999). Law in Brief Encounters. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Shook, J. R. (2000). ‘Introduction,’ in J. R. Shook, ed., The Chicago School of Pragmatism: Vol. 1. The Development of Instrumentalism: Experience, Knowledge, and Reality. Bristol, U.K.: Thoemmes Press, pp. xi-xxviii.
Shook, J. R., ed. (2001). The Chicago School of Functionalism (3 Vols.). Bristol, U.K.: Thoemmes Press.
Simon, H. A. (1975). ‘The functional equivalence of problem solving skills,’ Cognitive Psychology7, 268–288.
Simon, H. A. (1981). The Sciences of the Artificial(Second Edition). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Stephenson, W. (1953). The Study of Behavior: Q-Technique and its Methodology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Stephenson, W. (1980). ‘Consciring: A general theory for subjective communicability,’ in D. Nimmo, ed., Communication Yearbook 4. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction, pp. 7–36.
Sylvan, D. J. (1991). ‘The qualitative-quantitative distinction in political science,’ Poetics Today12, 267–286.
Thompson, J. W. (1962). ‘Meaningful and unmeaningful rotation of factors,’ Psychological Bulletin59, 211–223.
Wittgenstein, L. (1971). Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus(1961 Trans., Second Edition). New York: Humanities Press.
Zizek, F. (1913). Statistical Averages: A Methodological Study(W.M. Persons, Trans.). New York: Holt.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Brown, S.R. Structural and functional information. Policy Sciences 35, 285–304 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021358313052
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021358313052