Skip to main content
Log in

The significance of random bladder biopsies in superficial bladder cancer

  • Published:
International Urology and Nephrology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction: Today, there is no consensus about taking random bladder biopsies during transurethral resection of superficial bladder tumors for staging and to determine the urothelial abnormalities like dysplasia and carcinoma in situ. The aim of our study was to evaluate the results and indications of random bladder biopsies for primary superficial bladder cancer.Patients and methods: Random bladder biopsies were taken from 84 patients with primary superficial bladder cancer after transurethral resection. 40 patients had Ta and 44 had T1 tumor. The random biopsies were taken from right and left bladder walls, anterior and posterior walls, dome, trigone and prostatic urethra. The incidence of urothelial abnormalities were evaluated according to the stage and grade of the tumor.Results: None of the patients had carcinoma in situ or dysplasia with Ta tumor. In T1 group, 4 patients (9.1%) had carcinoma in situ and 3 patients (6.8%) had dysplasia. There was a statistically significant difference with regard to urothelial abnormalities between groups Ta and T1. The same difference was also seen between low and high grade tumors.Conclusion: In our study, only 7/84 (8.3%) of patients with primary superficial bladder cancer had urothelial abnormalities like carcinoma in situ or dysplasia. All of these pathologies were seen in T1 tumors. According to our results, we believe that random biopsies are not useful in superficial bladder cancers to detect urothelial abnormalities and also do not help for the planning of further treatment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Abel PD. Prognostic indices in transitional cell carcinoma of the bladder. Br J Urol 1988; 62: 103–109.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Fair WR, Fuks ZY, Scher HI. Cancer of the Bladder. Principles and Practice of Oncology, 4th edn. Philadelphia: Lippincott, 1993: 1052–1072.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Lutzeyer W, Rubben H, Dahm H. Prognostic parameters in superficial bladder cancer: an analysis of 315 patients. J Urol 1982; 127: 250–252.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Heney NM, Ahmed S, Flanagan MJ et al. Superficial bladder cancer: progression and recurrence. J Urol 1983; 130: 1083–1086.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Fitzpatrick JM, West AB, Butler MR et al. Superficial bladder tumors (stage pTa, grade I and II): the importance of recurrence pattern following initial resection. J Urol 9186; 135: 920–922.

  6. Rodriguez FM, Toniolo-Chechile G, Bayari-Salvador J et al. Multivariate analysis of the prognostic factors of primary superficial bladder cancer. J Urol 2000; 163: 73–78.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Kiemeney LA, Witjes JA, Heijbroek RP et al. Dysplasia in normal looking urothelium increases the risk of tumor progression in primary superficial bladder cancer. Eur J Cancer 1994; 30A(11): 1621–1625.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Lamm DL. Carcinoma in situ. Urol Clin North Am 1992; 19: 499–508.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Taguchi I, Gohji K, Hara I et al. Clinical evaluation of random biopsy of urinary bladder in patients with superficial bladder cancer. Int J Urol 1998; 5(1): 30–34.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Smith G, Elton RA, Beynon LL et al. Prognostic significance of biopsy results of normal-looking mucosa in cases of superficial bladder cancer. Br J Urol 1983; 55: 665–669.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Mufti GR, Singh M. Value of random mucosal biopsies in the management of superficial bladder cancer. Eur Urol 1992; 22(4): 288–293.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Richards B, Parmar MKB, Anderson CK et al. Interpretation of biopsies of normal urothelium in patients with superficial bladder cancer. Br J Urol 1991; 67: 369–375.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Kiemeney LA, Witjes JA, Heijbroek RP et al. Should random urothelium biopsies be taken from patients with primary superficial bladder cancer? A decision analysis. Br J Urol 1994; 73(2): 164–171.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Van Der Meijden A, Oosterlinck W, Brausi M et al. Significance of bladder biopsies in Ta, T1 bladder tumors: a report from the EORTC genitourinary tract cancer cooperative group. Eur Urol 1999; 35: 267–271.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Göğüş, Ç., Bedük, Y., Türkölmez, K. et al. The significance of random bladder biopsies in superficial bladder cancer. Int Urol Nephrol 34, 59–61 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021354811825

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021354811825

Navigation