Skip to main content
Log in

European mussel cultivation along the Atlantic coast: production status, problems and perspectives

  • Published:
Hydrobiologia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Mussel culture in Europe produces about 50% of the annual world-wide harvest of mussels. The main yields of atlantic mussels are from Spain, The Netherlands and Denmark, while the Mediterranean production predominantly comes from Italy. Production in these traditional areas have been stabilised since the 1970s, and the share of Europe in the world production has decreased due to increased production outside Europe. The following factors are important in analysing production status and perspectives. Mussel production is based on an extensive culture and depends entirely on natural resources for food, spat and space. In the main culture areas, production with existing techniques seems to have reached the system's carrying capacity. Spat availability can be an additional limiting factor, particularly in bottom culture. In many traditional mussel culture areas, new functions have developed, such as recreation and nature conservation, and therefore extension of mussel culture is now also space limited. Expansion of mussel culture in Europe takes place in areas like Scottish fjords, Ireland and Greece, and is planned in Norway. Further development of sustainable mussel culture in Europe has different requirements for traditional and for new areas. In new areas the main problems are harmful blooms, local productivity and development of markets. Culture in traditional areas would benefit from optimisation of the system's exploitation capacity, improved spat collection and active participation in coastal zone management. This implies communication with other stakeholders, and exploitation of the mussel stocks within the framework of ecosystem management. Experience with this type of mussel culture is also relevant for development in the new culture areas.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anonymous, 1999. Norges muligheter for verdiskaping innen havbruk. DKNVS/NTVA, Trondheim: 39 (In Nordic).

  • Anonymous, 2000. Shellfish production in the UK in 1999. Shellfish News 10: 26-30.

  • Beukema, J. J., 1992. Expected changes in the Wadden Sea benthos in a warmer world: lessons from periods with mild winters. Neth. J. Sea Res. 11: 42-55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blanton, J. O., K. R. Tenore, F. Castillejo, L. P. Atkonson, F. B. Schwing & A. Lavin, 1987. The relationship of upwelling to mussel production rias on the western coast of Spain. J. mar. Res. 45: 497-511.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caceres-Martinez, J. & A. Figueras, 1997. The mussel, oyster, clam and pectinid fisheries of Spain. NOAA Technical Report NMFS 129: 165-190.

  • Dosdat, A. & C. de la Pomelie, 2000. Regulation and monitoring of marine aquaculture in France. J. Appl. Ichtyol. 16: 157-162.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dijkema, R., 1997. Molluscan fisheries and culture in The Netherlands. NOAA Technical report NMFS 129: 115-136.

  • Edwards, E., 1997. Molluscan fisheries in Britain. NOAA Technical report NMFS 129: 85-100.

  • FAO, 2000a. Yearbook of Fishery Statistics, Capture Production. Rome, Vol. 86/1.

  • FAO, 2000b. Yearbook of Aquaculture Production. Rome, Vol. 86/2.

  • Fernandes, T. F., K. Miller & P. A. Read, 2000. Monitoring and regulation of marine aquaculture in Europe. J. Appl. Ichtyol. 16: 138-143.

    Google Scholar 

  • Furness, B. 2000. How to keep eider ducks off mussel farms. Shellfish News 10: 8-10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Globefish, 1998a. Commodity update of bivalves. FAO, Rome.

  • Globefish, 1998b. The world market for mussels. FAO/Globefish Research Programme, Vol. 55. Rome: 123 pp.

  • Goulletquer, P. & M. Héral, 1997. Marine molluscan production trends in France: from fisheries to aquaculture. NOAA Technical report NMFS 129: 137-164.

  • Haamer, J. 1997. The mussel industry of Sweden. NOAA Technical report NMFS 129: 1-6.

  • Henderson, A. R. & I. M. Davies, 2000. Review of aquaculture, its regulation and monitoring in Scotland. J. Appl. Ichtyol. 16: 200-208

    Google Scholar 

  • ICES, 1999. Report of the ICES-IOC working group on harmful algal bloom dynamics. ICES cm 1999/C:4.

  • Kristensen, P. S., 1997. Oyster and mussel fisheries in Denmark, NOAA Technical report NMFS 129: 25-38.

  • MacAlister Elliott & partners Ltd, 1999. Forward study of community aquaculture, summary report. EU DG XIV, Brussels.

  • McGrorty, S, R. T. Clarke, C. J. Reading & J. Goss-Custard, 1990. Population dynamics of the mussel Mytilus edulis: density changes and regulation of the population in the Exe estuary, Devon. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 67: 157-169

    Google Scholar 

  • Mattei. N. & M. Pellizzato, 1997. Mollusc fisheries and aquaculture in Italy. NOAA Technical report NMFS 129: 201-216.

  • McMahon, T., 2000. Regulation and monitoring of marine aquaculture in Ireland. J. Appl. Ichtyol. 16: 177-181.

    Google Scholar 

  • Monfort, M. C., 1999. The European market for bivalves. FAO/Globefish Research Programme, Vol. 62, Rome, 81 pp.

  • Navarro, E., J. I. P. Iglesias, A. Perez Camacho, U. Labarta & R. Beiras, 1991. The physiological energetics of mussels from different cultivation rafts in the Ria de Arosa. Aquaculture 94 (2/3): 197-212.

    Google Scholar 

  • ODUS, 2001. Uit de schulp, visie op duurzame ontwikkeling van de Nederlndse schelpdiervisserij. Yerseke, NL: 51 pp. (in Dutch).

  • O'sullivan, G., 1998. Present situation and future prospects for cultivation, commercialisation and industrialisation of mussels in Ireland. Globefish 55: 55-60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prins T. C., A. C. Smaal & R. F., Dame, 1998. A review of feedbacks between bivalve grazing and ecosystem processes. Aquat. Ecol. 31: 349-359.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schlauch, J. 1999. Entwicklung und Struktur der deutschen Molluskenfisherei und-kultur im trilateralen Vergleich mit Danemark und den Niederlanden. Bamberger Wirtschaftsgeografischen Arbeiten, heft 10 (in German).

  • Seaman, M. N. L. & M. Ruth, 1997. The molluscan fisheries of Germany. NOAA Technical report NMFS 129: 57-84.

  • Smaal A. C. & L. Lucas, 2000. Regulation and monitoring of marine aquaculture in The Netherlands. J. Appl. Ichtyol. 16: 187-191.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smaal, A. C. & T. C. Prins, 1993. The uptake of organic matter and the release of inorganic nutrients by bivalve suspension feeder beds. In: Dame, R. F. (ed.), Bivalve Filter Feeders in Estuarine and Coastal Ecosystem Processes. Springer, Berlin: 271-298.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smaal A., M. van Stralen & E. Schuiling, 2001. The interaction between shellfish culture and ecosystem processes. Can. J. Fish. aquat. Sci. 58: 991-1002.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steins, N., 1999. All hands on deck-an interactive perspective on complex common-pool resource management based on case studies in the coastal waters of the Isle of Wight (UK), Connemara (Ireland) and the Dutch Wadden Sea. Thesis, Wageningen Universiteit, Wageningen: 225 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strand, O. & J. H. Vølstad, 1997. The molluscan fisheries and culture in Norway. NOAA Technical report NMFS 129: 7-24.

  • Van Stralen, M. R. & R. D. Dijkema, 1994. Mussel culture in a changing environment: the effects of a coastal engineering project on mussel culture (Mytilus edulis L.) in the Oosterschelde (SW Netherlands) Hydrobiologia 282/283: 359-379.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Smaal, A. European mussel cultivation along the Atlantic coast: production status, problems and perspectives. Hydrobiologia 484, 89–98 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021352904712

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021352904712

Navigation