Skip to main content

Intelligence without representation – Merleau-Ponty's critique of mental representation The relevance of phenomenology to scientific explanation

Abstract

Existential phenomenologists hold that the two most basic forms of intelligent behavior, learning, and skillful action, can be described and explained without recourse to mind or brain representations. This claim is expressed in two central notions in Merleau-Ponty's Phenomenology of Perception: the intentional arc and the tendency to achieve a maximal grip. The intentional arc names the tight connection between body and world, such that, as the active body acquires skills, those skills are “stored”, not as representations in the mind, but as dispositions to respond to the solicitations of situations in the world. A phenomenology of skill acquisition confirms that, as one acquires expertise, the acquired know-how is experienced as finer and finer discriminations of situations paired with the appropriate response to each. Maximal grip names the body's tendency to refine its responses so as to bring the current situation closer to an optimal gestalt. Thus, successful learning and action do not require propositional mental representations. They do not require semantically interpretable brain representations either.

Simulated neural networks exhibit crucial structural features of the intentional arc, and Walter Freeman's account of the brain dynamics underlying perception and action is structurally isomorphic with Merleau-Ponty's account of the way a skilled agent is led by the situation to move towards obtaining a maximal grip.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

References

  1. Dreyfus, H. 1991. What Computers Still Can't Do. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Dreyfus, H. and Dreyfus, S. 1982. Mind Over Machine. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Freeman, W. J. 1991. The physiology of perception. Scientific American 264: 78–85.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Husserl, E. 1989. Ideas Pertaining to a Pure Phenomenology and to a Phenomenological Philosophy, Second Book: Studies in the Phenomenology of Constitution, trans. Richard Rojcewicz and André Schuwer. Collected Works: Volume 3. The Hague: Kluwer Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Merleau-Ponty, M. 1962. Phenomenology of Perception. London and New York: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Searle, J. 1991. In: Ernest Lepore and Robert Van Gulick (eds). John Searle and his Critics. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Todes, S. 2001. Body and Word. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Dreyfus, H.L. Intelligence without representation – Merleau-Ponty's critique of mental representation The relevance of phenomenology to scientific explanation. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 1, 367–383 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021351606209

Download citation

Keywords

  • Mental Representation
  • Successful Learning
  • Maximal Grip
  • Skillful Action
  • Tight Connection