Abstract
We examine electric utilityinvestor reaction surrounding twenty-twomilestones associated with the passage of theClean Air Act Amendments of 1990. Resultssuggest that investors did not react sharply tothe passage of the Amendments. To the extentthat statistically significant effects wereobserved, we interpret the results as moreindicative of investor concern over resolutionof uncertainty surrounding the politicalprocess and resulting provisions than ofconcern over the expected costs of compliancefollowing passage of the Amendments. Weobserved little, if any, difference betweenutilities subject to Phase I restrictions andthose not subject to Phase I. Finally, changesin monthly excess returns appear to haveresulted from changes in U.S. interest ratesand investor concern over power industryderegulation. We view our results as importantbecause any wealth effects due to environmentalregulations represent a real economic costassociated with their implementation. In thissense, we view the results as “good news” forU.S. environmental policy makers.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bailey, E. M. (1998), Allowance Trading Activity and State Regulatory Rulings: Evidence from the U.S. Acid Rain Program, working paper, MIT.
Brealey, R. A. and S. C. Myers (2000), Principles of Corporate Finance, 6th edn. Boston, MA: Irwin McGraw-Hill.
Brown, S. J. and J. B. Warner (1985), ‘Using Daily Stock Returns: The Case of Event Studies’, Journal of Financial Economics 14, 3–31.
Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990, Publication L, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.
Coggins, J. S. and J. R. Swinton (1996), ‘The Price of Pollution: A Dual Approach to Valuing SO2Allowances’, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 30, 58–72.
Dixit, A. K. and R. S. Pindyck (1994), Investment Under Uncertainty. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
Dodd, P. and J. B. Warner (1983), ‘On Corporate Governance: A Study of Proxy Contests’, Journal of Financial Economics 11, 401–438.
Ellerman, A. D. and J. P. Montero (1998), ‘The Declining Trend in Sulfur Dioxide Emissions: Implications for Allowance Prices’, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 36, 26–45.
Ellerman, A. D., R. Schmalensee, P. L. Joskow, J. P. Montero, and E. M. Bailey (1998), Emissions Trading under the U.S. Acid Rain Program: Evaluation of Compliance Costs and Allowance Market Performance. Cambridge, MA: Center for Energy and Environmental Policy Research, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
Fullerton, D., S. P. McDermott and J. P. Caulkins (1997), ‘Sulfur Dioxide Compliance of a Regulated Utility’, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 34, 32–53.
ICF Resources, Inc. (1989), Economic Analysis of Title V (Acid Rain Provisions) of the Administration’s Proposed Clean Air Act Amendments. Report prepared for the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.
Joskow, P. L., R. Schmalensee and E. M. Bailey (1998), ‘The Market for Sulfur Dioxide Emissions’, American Economic Review 88, 669–685.
Lau, S. T., J. D. Diltz and V. P. Apilado (1994), ‘Valuation Effects of International Stock Exchange Listings’, Journal of Banking and Finance 18, 743–755.
MacKinlay, A. C. (1997), ‘Event Studies in Economics and Finance’, Journal of Economic Literature 35, 13–39.
Montero, J. P. (1997), ‘Marketable Pollution Permits with Uncertainty and Transaction Costs’, Resource and Energy Economics 20, 27–50.
Rico, R. (1995), ‘The U.S. Allowance Trading System for Sulfur Dioxide: An Update on Market Experience’, Environmental and Resource Economics 5, 115–129.
Stavins, R. N. (1995), ‘Transaction Costs and Tradeable Permits’, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 29, 133–148.
Tietenberg, T. (1995), ‘Tradeable Permits for Pollution Control when Emission Location Matters: What have We Learned?’, Environmental and Resource Economics 5, 95–113.
Travlos, N. G. (1987), ‘Corporate Takeover Bids, Methods of Payment, and Bidding Firms’ Stock Returns’, Journal of Finance 42, 943–963.
Tschirhart, J. and S. Y. Wen (1999), ‘Tradable Allowances in a Restructuring Electric Industry’, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 38, 195–214.
U.S. EPA (1990), “The Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990”, mimeo.
White, H. (1980), ‘A Heteroskedasticity-Consistent Covariance Matrix Estimator and Direct Test for Heteroskedasticity’, Econometrica 48, 817–838.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Diltz, J.D. U.S. Equity Markets and Environmental Policy. The Case of Electric Utility Investor Behavior During the Passage of the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990 . Environmental and Resource Economics 23, 379–401 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021351226459
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021351226459