Skip to main content
Log in

U.S. Equity Markets and Environmental Policy. The Case of Electric Utility Investor Behavior During the Passage of the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990

  • Published:
Environmental and Resource Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We examine electric utilityinvestor reaction surrounding twenty-twomilestones associated with the passage of theClean Air Act Amendments of 1990. Resultssuggest that investors did not react sharply tothe passage of the Amendments. To the extentthat statistically significant effects wereobserved, we interpret the results as moreindicative of investor concern over resolutionof uncertainty surrounding the politicalprocess and resulting provisions than ofconcern over the expected costs of compliancefollowing passage of the Amendments. Weobserved little, if any, difference betweenutilities subject to Phase I restrictions andthose not subject to Phase I. Finally, changesin monthly excess returns appear to haveresulted from changes in U.S. interest ratesand investor concern over power industryderegulation. We view our results as importantbecause any wealth effects due to environmentalregulations represent a real economic costassociated with their implementation. In thissense, we view the results as “good news” forU.S. environmental policy makers.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bailey, E. M. (1998), Allowance Trading Activity and State Regulatory Rulings: Evidence from the U.S. Acid Rain Program, working paper, MIT.

  • Brealey, R. A. and S. C. Myers (2000), Principles of Corporate Finance, 6th edn. Boston, MA: Irwin McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, S. J. and J. B. Warner (1985), ‘Using Daily Stock Returns: The Case of Event Studies’, Journal of Financial Economics 14, 3–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990, Publication L, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.

  • Coggins, J. S. and J. R. Swinton (1996), ‘The Price of Pollution: A Dual Approach to Valuing SO2Allowances’, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 30, 58–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dixit, A. K. and R. S. Pindyck (1994), Investment Under Uncertainty. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dodd, P. and J. B. Warner (1983), ‘On Corporate Governance: A Study of Proxy Contests’, Journal of Financial Economics 11, 401–438.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellerman, A. D. and J. P. Montero (1998), ‘The Declining Trend in Sulfur Dioxide Emissions: Implications for Allowance Prices’, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 36, 26–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellerman, A. D., R. Schmalensee, P. L. Joskow, J. P. Montero, and E. M. Bailey (1998), Emissions Trading under the U.S. Acid Rain Program: Evaluation of Compliance Costs and Allowance Market Performance. Cambridge, MA: Center for Energy and Environmental Policy Research, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fullerton, D., S. P. McDermott and J. P. Caulkins (1997), ‘Sulfur Dioxide Compliance of a Regulated Utility’, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 34, 32–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • ICF Resources, Inc. (1989), Economic Analysis of Title V (Acid Rain Provisions) of the Administration’s Proposed Clean Air Act Amendments. Report prepared for the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.

  • Joskow, P. L., R. Schmalensee and E. M. Bailey (1998), ‘The Market for Sulfur Dioxide Emissions’, American Economic Review 88, 669–685.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lau, S. T., J. D. Diltz and V. P. Apilado (1994), ‘Valuation Effects of International Stock Exchange Listings’, Journal of Banking and Finance 18, 743–755.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacKinlay, A. C. (1997), ‘Event Studies in Economics and Finance’, Journal of Economic Literature 35, 13–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Montero, J. P. (1997), ‘Marketable Pollution Permits with Uncertainty and Transaction Costs’, Resource and Energy Economics 20, 27–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rico, R. (1995), ‘The U.S. Allowance Trading System for Sulfur Dioxide: An Update on Market Experience’, Environmental and Resource Economics 5, 115–129.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stavins, R. N. (1995), ‘Transaction Costs and Tradeable Permits’, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 29, 133–148.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tietenberg, T. (1995), ‘Tradeable Permits for Pollution Control when Emission Location Matters: What have We Learned?’, Environmental and Resource Economics 5, 95–113.

    Google Scholar 

  • Travlos, N. G. (1987), ‘Corporate Takeover Bids, Methods of Payment, and Bidding Firms’ Stock Returns’, Journal of Finance 42, 943–963.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tschirhart, J. and S. Y. Wen (1999), ‘Tradable Allowances in a Restructuring Electric Industry’, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 38, 195–214.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. EPA (1990), “The Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990”, mimeo.

  • White, H. (1980), ‘A Heteroskedasticity-Consistent Covariance Matrix Estimator and Direct Test for Heteroskedasticity’, Econometrica 48, 817–838.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Diltz, J.D. U.S. Equity Markets and Environmental Policy. The Case of Electric Utility Investor Behavior During the Passage of the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990 . Environmental and Resource Economics 23, 379–401 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021351226459

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021351226459

Navigation