Abstract
Theoretical and empirical research on voluntarism has focused primarily on U.S. and European examples, but has generally failed to consider the Japanese system of voluntary environmental agreements. Nevertheless, Japanese VEAs are one of the world’s oldest experiments in voluntary policy; careful analysis of the characteristics and contexts may improve understanding about the critical factors associated with effective voluntary policy. This paper reviews the extant literature on voluntarism focusing specifically on the bargaining context within which agreements are negotiated. It details three factors that contribute to the effectiveness of voluntary policy generally: regulatory bargaining power, non-regulatory bargaining power and reciprocity. The paper then provides a brief but detailed analysis of the development of voluntary agreements in Japan. Comparisons with voluntary policies in the U.S. and Europe are included. Findings indicate similarities and some significant differences between the Japanese system and other national systems of voluntary policy. Conclusions discuss implications for theory and policy.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
References
Andrews, R. N. L. (1998). ‘Environmental regulation and business “self-regulation,”’ Policy Sciences 31: 177–197.
Arora, S. and T. Cason (1996). ‘Why do firms volunteer to exceed environmental regulations? Understanding participation in the EPA's 33/50 Program,’ Land Economics 72: 413–432.
Arora, S. and S. Gangopadhyay (1995). ‘Toward a theoretical model of emissions control,’ Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 28: 289–309.
Baggot, R. (1986). ‘By voluntary agreement: The Politics of Instrument selection,’ Public Administration 64: 510–67.
Baron, D. (1996). Business and Its Environment. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Becker, G. (1983). ‘A theory of competition among pressure groups for political influence,’ Quarterly Journal of Economics 98: 371–400.
Bernstein, M. H. (1977). Regulating Business by Independent Commission. Westport: Greenwood Press.
Broadbent, J. (1998). Environmental Politics in Japan. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press.
Buchholz, R. (1993). Principles of Environmental Management: The Greening of Business. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Delmas M. A. and A. K. Terlaak (2001). ‘A framework for analyzing environmental agreements,’ California Management Review 43 (3): 44–64.
EEA (European Environment Agency) (1998). Environmental Agreements: Environmental Effectiveness (Environmental Issues Series, Vol. 1). Copenhagen, Denmark: European Environment Agency.
Fiorino, D. J. (1988). ‘Regulatory negotiation as a policy process,’ Public Administration Review July/August, 764–772
Glasbergen, P. (1986). ‘Environmental politics: The choice of instruments,’ International Sociological Association. Association Paper MK86/294.
Glasbergen, P. (1998). ‘Modern environmental agreements: A policy instrument becomes a management strategy,’ Journal of Environmental Planning and Management 41 (6): 693–709.
Gresser, J., K. Fujikura and A. Morishima (1981). Environmental Law in Japan. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Groenewegen, P., K. Fischer, E. G. Jenkins, and J. Schot (1996). The Greening of Industry Resource Guide and Bibliography. Washington, DC: Island Press.
Haley, J. O. (1992). ‘Consensual governance: A study of law, culture, and the political economy of postwar Japan,’ in S. Kumon and H. Rosovsky, The Political Economy of Japan: Cultural and Social Dynamics, Vol. 3. Stanford: Stanford University Press, pp. 33–62.
Hall, P. A. (1995). ‘The Japanese civil service and economic development in comparative perspective,’ in H. Kim, M. Muramatsu, T. J. Pempel and K. Yamamura, eds., The Japanese Civil Service and Economic Development: Catalysts of Change. Oxford: Clarendon Press, pp. 484–505.
Hanf, K. and I. Koppen (1993). Environmental Alternative Decision-Making Techniques for Conflict Resolution: Meditation in the Netherlands. Berlin: Berlin Science Center.
Hart, S. L. (1999). ‘Coproations as agents of gloval sustainability: Beyond competitive strategy,’ in D. L. Cooperrider, and J. E. Dutton, eds., Organizational Dimensions of Global Change: No Limits to Cooperation. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications, pp. 346–362.
Herring, E. P. (1936). Public Administration and the Public Interest. New York: McGraw Hill Book Company.
Howard, J., J. Nash and J. Ehrenfeld (2000). ‘Standard or smokescreen? Implementation of a voluntary environmental code,’ California Management Review 42 (2): 63–82.
Imura, H. (1989). ‘Administration ofp ollution control at local level,’ in S. Tsuru and H. Weidner, eds., Environmental Policy in Japan. Berlin: Sigma Bohn, pp. 54–96.
Interviews (October, 2000). Kita Kyushu city government officials, Kita Kyushu City.
Interviews (February, 2001a). Kita Kyushu city government officials, Kita Kyushu City.
Interviews (May, 2001b).Yokohama city government officials, Yokohama City.
Iwabuchi, I. (1998). ‘Environmental governance and the role ofb usiness,’ in M. Sasanouchi, ed., Business and Environmental Governance. Hayama, Kanagawa, Japan: Institute for Global Environmental Strategies.
Japan Environment Agency (1999). Survey of Environmental Protection Measures by Local Governments (Kikkaku Chooseikyoku). Tokyo: Environment Agency.
Johnson, Ch. (1982). MITI and the Japanese Miracle. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Karamanos, P. (2001). ‘Voluntary environmental agreements: Evolution and definition ofa new environmental policy approach,’ Journal of Environmental Planning and Management 44 (1): 67–84.
Khanna, M. and L. A. Damon (1999). ‘EPA's voluntary 33/50 program: Impact on toxic releases and economic performance of firms,’ Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 37: 1–25.
Kita Kyushu Shi Kougai Taisakushi (Kita Kyushu City History of Environmental Countermeasures) (1998). Kita Kyshu City, Japan.
Kogyo Danchi (1998) (Industry Statistics). Tokyo: Ministry of Finance.
Labatt, S. and V. W. Maclaren (1998). ‘Voluntary corporate environmental initiatives: A typology and preliminary investigation,’ Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy 16: 191–209.
Lesbirel, S. H. (1998). NIMBY Politics in Japan: Energy Siting and the Management of Environmental Conflict. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
Lutz, S., T. Lyon and J. Maxwell (1998). ‘Strategic quality choice with minimum quality standards,’ Discussion Paper # 1793. London: Center for Economic Policy Research.
Lyon, T. and J. Maxwell (1999). Voluntary approaches to environmental regulation: A survey,’ Working Paper, Department of Business, Economics, and Public Policy, Kelley School of Business. Bloomington: Indiana University.
Lyon, T. and J. Maxwell (1999). ‘Corporate environmental strategies as tools to influence regulation,’ Business Strategy and the Environment 8: 189–196.
Matsuno, Y. (1998). ‘Tekkogyo No Okeru Iousannkabutsu Haisyutusakugen Heno Kakusyu Kankyo Seisaku Syudan noKiyo (1),’ Kyoto Daigaku Keisai Gakkai Keisai Ronsou 159: 5–6.
Maxwell, J. and C. Decker (1998). 'Voluntary environmental investment and regulatory flexibility,’ Working Paper, Department of Business Economics and Public Policy, Kelley School of Business. Bloomington: Indiana University.
Maxwell, J., T. Lyon and S. Hackett (1998). Self-Regulation and Social Welfare: The Political Economy of Corporate Environmentalism (Nota di Lavoro 55.98). Milan, Italy: Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei.
Mazurek, J., R. Gottlieb and J. Roque (1995). ‘Shifting to prevention: The limits of current policy,’ in R. Gottlieb, ed., Reducing Toxics: A New Approach to Policy and Industrial Decisionmaking. Washington, DC: Island Press.
Mazurek, J. (1999) Making Microchips: Policy, Globalization, and Economic Restructuring in the Semiconductor Industry. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
McSpadden, L. (2000). ‘Environmental policy in the courts,’ in N. J. Vig and M. E. Kraft, Environmental Policy: New Directions for the Twenty-First Century (4th ed.). Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly Press, pp. 145–164.
Mitsuda, H. (1997). ‘Surging Environmentalism in Japan: A sociological perspective,’ in M. Redclift and G. Woodgate, eds., The International Handbook of Environmental Sociology. Cheltenham, U.K.: Edward Elgar, pp. 442–452.
Mol, A. P. J. and G. Spaargaren (1993). ‘Environment, modernity, and the risk society: The apocalyptic horizon of environmental reform,’ International Sociology 8 (4): 431–459.
Murakami,Y. and T. P. Rohlen (1992). ‘Social exchange aspects of the Japanese political economy: Culture, efficiency and change,’ in S. Kumon, S. and H. Rosovsky, The Political Economy of Japan: Cultural and Social Dynamics, Vol. 3. Stanford: Stanford University Press, pp. 63–105.
Okimoto, D. (1989). Between MITI and the Market: Japanese Industrial Policy for High Technology. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Reitbergen, M.G., M. Breukels and K. Blok (1999). Voluntary Agreements-Implementation and Efficiency: Case Studies in the Sectors of Paper and Glass Manufacturing. Utrecht University: Department of Science, Technology and Society.
Rennings, K., K. L. Brockmann and H. Bergmann (1997). ‘Voluntary agreements in environmental protection: Experiences in Germany and future perspectives,’ Business Strategy and the Environment 6: 45–263.
Rosenbaum, W. A. (2000). ‘Escaping the “battered agency syndrome”: EPA's gamble with regulatory reinvention,’ in C. Carraro and F. Leveque, eds., Voluntary Approaches in Environmental Policy. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp. 165–189.
Ryan, C. M. (2001). ‘Leadership in collaborative policy-making: An analysis of a gency roles in regulatory negotiations,’ Policy Sciences 34: 221–245.
Samuels, R. J. (1987). The Business of the Japanese State: Energy Markets in Comparative and Historical Perspective. Ithaca: The Cornell University Press.
Sawa, T. ed. (1997). Japan's Experience in the Battle Against Air Pollution. Tokyo, Japan: The Pollution Related Health Damage Compensation and Prevention Association.
Skocpol, T. (1985). ‘Bringing the state back in: Current research,’ in P. B. Evans, D. Rueschemeyer and T. Skocpol, eds., Bringing the State Back In. London: Cambridge University Press, pp. 3–37.
Segersen, K. and T. Miceli (1998). ‘Voluntary approaches to environmental protection: The role of legislative threats,’ Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 36: 109–130.
Smart, B. (1992). Beyond Compliance: A New Industry View of the Environment. Washington, DC: World Resources Institute.
Smith, A. (1996). ‘Voluntary schemes and the need for statutory regulation: The case of integrated pollution control,’ Business Strategy and the Environment 5: 81–86.
Starik, M. amd A. A. Marcus (2000). ‘Special research forum on the management of organizations in the natural environment: A field emerging from multiple paths, with many challenges ahead,’ The Academy of Management Journal Vol. 43, No. 4, pp. 539–547.
Storey, M., G. Boyd and J. Dowd (1999). ‘Voluntary agreements with industry,’ in C. Carraro and F. Leveque, eds., Voluntary Approaches in Environmental Policy. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp. 187–207.
Sugiyama, R. and H. Imura (1999). ‘Voluntary approaches in Japan: Proven record of pollution control agreements and new industrial initiatives for the protection of the global environment,’ Eco-Management and Auditing 6: 128–134.
Susskind, L. and G. McMahon (1985). ‘The theory and practice of negotiated rulemaking,’ Yale Journal on Regulation 3 (1): 133–165.
Takasaki, M. (1998). ‘Environmetnal governance and steel industry,’ in M. Sasanouchi, ed., Business and Environmental Governance. Hayama, Kanagawa, Japan: Institute for Global Environmental Strategies.
Tsutsumi, R. (2001). ‘The nature of voluntary agreements in Japan-functions of environment and pollution control agreements,’ Journal of Cleaner Production 9: 145–153.
Upham, F. K. (1989). Law and Social Change in Postwar Japan. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
U.S. DOE (United States Department of Energy) (1998). Climate Challenge Program Description. http//:www.eren.doe.gov/climatechallenge/factsheet.htm.
U.S. EPA (United State Environmental Protection Agency) (1999). 33/50 Program: The Final Record. http://www.epa.gov/opptintr/3350/.
Wallace, D. (1995). Environmental Policy and Industrial Innovation: Strategies in Europe, the U.S.A and Japan. London: Earthscan Publications Ltd.
Weidner, H. (1989). ‘Japanese environmental policy in an international perspective: Lessons for a preventative approach,’ in S. Tsuru and H. Weidner, eds., Environmental Policy in Japan. Berlin: Sigma Bohn, pp. 479–552.
Welch, E. and A. Hibiki (2002). ‘In institutional framework for analysis of voluntary policy,’ Working Paper, Center for Technology and Environmental Studies, Syracuse Univeristy.
Welch, E., A. Mazur and S. Bretschneider (2000). ‘Voluntary behavior by electric utilities: Levels of adoptiona and contribution of the climate challenge program to the reduction of carbon dioxide,’ Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 19 (3): 407–425.
Wilks, S. and M. Wright (1991). The Promotion and Regulation of Industry in Japan. London: MacMillian Press.
Williams, H., J. Medhurst, J. and K. Drew (1993). ‘Corporate strategies for a sustainable future,’ in K. Fischer and J. Schot, eds., Environmental Strategies for Industry: International Perspectives on Research Needs and Policy Implications. Washington, DC: Island Press, pp. 117–146.
Young, M. K. (1991). ‘Structural adjustment of mature industries in Japan: Legal institutions, industry associations and bargaining,’ in S. Wilks and M. Wright, eds., The Promotion and Regulation of Industry in Japan. London: MacMillan Press, pp. 135–166.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Welch, E.W., Hibiki, A. Japanese voluntary environmental agreements: Bargaining power and reciprocity as contributors to effectiveness. Policy Sciences 35, 401–424 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021344508225
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021344508225
Keywords
- Detailed Analysis
- Economic Policy
- Empirical Research
- Critical Factor
- Careful Analysis