New Forests

, Volume 24, Issue 3, pp 165–174 | Cite as

Research needs for restoring tropical forests in Southeast Asia for wildlife conservation: framework species selection and seed propagation

  • David Blakesley
  • Kate Hardwick
  • Stephen Elliott


Some governments in Southeast Asia, such as those of Thailand and Vietnam have clear policies to restore large areas of degraded land to native forest. However, knowledge needed for the success of these ambitious programmes is still inadequate, and considerable further research is required. Furthermore, very little literature is available to conservation practitioners about the restoration of tropical forests for biodiversity conservation. This paper introduces the framework species method of forest restoration, which is being developed to restore forests in Thailand. The paper examines the potential for adoption of this technique in different forest types across the Southeast Asia region, and identifies priorities for future research needed before the method can be widely implemented. These include the identification of forest types, the selection of candidate framework species, maintenance of genetic diversity, and development of methods of seed collection and germination.

Biodiversity conservation Forest restoration Genetic diversity Seed Trees 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Aldrich P.R., Hamrick J.L., Chavarriaga P. and Kochert G. 1998. Microsatellite analysis of demographic genetic structure in fragmented populations of the tropical tree Symphonia globulifera. Molecular Ecol. 7: 933–944.Google Scholar
  2. Barrett S.C.H. and Kohn J.R. 1991. Genetic and evolutionary consequences of small population sizes in plants: implications for conservation. In: Falk D.A. and Holsinger K.E. (eds), Genetics and Conservation of Rare Plants. Oxford University Press, New York, pp. 3–30.Google Scholar
  3. Blakesley D., Anusarnsunthorn V., Kerby J., Navakitbumrung P., Kuarak C., Zangkum S. et al. 2000. Nursery technology and tree species selection for restoring forest biodiversity in northern Thailand. In: Elliott S., Kerby J., Blakesley D., Hardwick K., Woods K. and Anusarnsunthorn V. (eds), Forest Restoration for Wildlife Conservation. International Tropical Timber Organisation and The Forest Restoration Research Unit. Chiang Mai University, Thailand, pp. 207–220.Google Scholar
  4. Blakesley D., Elliott S., Kuarak C., Navakitbumrung P., Zangkum S. and Anusarnsunthorn V. Propagating native framework tree species to restore seasonally dry tropical forest: implications of seasonal seed dispersal and dormancy. Forest Ecol. Manage. (in press).Google Scholar
  5. Corlett R.T. 1998. Frugivory and seed dispersal by vertebrates in the Oriental (Indomalayan) Region. Biol. Rev. 73: 413–448.Google Scholar
  6. Elliott S. (ed.) 2000. The Chiang Mai Research Agenda for the restoration of degraded forest lands for wildlife conservation in Southeast Asia. In: Elliott S., Kerby J., Blakesley D., Hardwick K., Woods K. and Anusarnsunthorn V. (eds), Forest Restoration for Wildlife Conservation. International Tropical Timber Organisation and The Forest Restoration Research Unit. Chiang Mai University, Thailand, pp. 383–411.Google Scholar
  7. Elliott S., Anusarnsunthorn V., Garwood N. and Blakesley D. 1995. Research needs for restoring the forests of Thailand. Nat. Hist. Bull. Siam. Soc. 43: 179–184.Google Scholar
  8. Elliott S., Kuarak C., Navakitbumrung P., Zangkum S., Anusarnsunthorn V. and Blakesley D. Propagating framework trees to restore seasonally dry tropical forest in northern Thailand. New Forests (in press).Google Scholar
  9. FAO Forest Resources Division 1995. Collecting woody perennials. In: Guarino L., Ramanath Rao V. and Reid R. (eds), Collecting Plant Genetic Diversity. Technical Guidelines. CAB International, pp. 467–484.Google Scholar
  10. Flannery T. 1995. Mammals of the South-west Pacific & Moluccan Islands. Cornell University Press, Ithaca, N.Y., USA.Google Scholar
  11. Forest Restoration Research Unit, Elliott S., Anusarnsunthorn V., Blakesley D. (eds) 1998. Forests for the Future: Growing and Planting Native Trees for Restoring Forest Ecosystems. 60 p.Google Scholar
  12. Forest Restoration Research Unit, Kerby J., Elliott S., Maxwell J.F., Blakesley D., and Anusarnsunthorn V. 2000. Tree seeds and seedlings for restoring forests in northern Thailand. 152 p.Google Scholar
  13. Garwood N.C. 1983. Seed germination in a seasonal tropical forest in Panama: a community study. Ecol. Monog. 53: 159–181.Google Scholar
  14. Goosem S.P. and Tucker N.I.J. 1995. Repairing the Rainforest-Theory and Practice of Rainforest Re-establishment in North Queensland's Wet Topics. Wet Tropics Management Authority, Cairns, 71 p.Google Scholar
  15. Guarino L., Ramanath Rao V. and Reid R. (eds) 1995. Collecting Plant Genetic Diversity. Technical Guidelines. CAB International, 748 p.Google Scholar
  16. Hardwick K., Healey J., Elliott S., Garwood N.C. and Anusarnsunthorn V. 1997. Understanding and assisting natural regeneration processes in degraded seasonal evergreen forests in northern Thailand. Forest Ecol. Manage. 99: 203–214.Google Scholar
  17. Janzen D.H. 1978. Seeding patterns of tropical trees. In: omlinson P.B. and Zimmermann M.H. (eds), Tropical trees as Living Systems. Cambridge University Press, pp. 83–128.Google Scholar
  18. Kijkar S. 1991a. Handbook: Coconut husk as a potting medium. ASEAN-Canada Forest Tree Seed Centre, Muak Lek, Thailand.Google Scholar
  19. Kijkar S. 1991b. Handbook: Producing rooted cuttings of Eucalyptus camaldulensis. ASEAN-Canada Forest Tree Seed Centre, Muak Lek, Thailand.Google Scholar
  20. Knowles O.H. and Parrotta J.A. 1995. Amazonian forest restoration: an innovative system for native species selection based on phenological data and field performance indices. Commonwealth Forestry Review 74: 230–243.Google Scholar
  21. Krishnapillay B., Mansorm M. and Mohd K. 1993. FRIM suggests seeds not necessarily orthodox or recalcitrant. Seed Centre News (ASEAN-Canada Forest Tree Centre Project) 10: 3.Google Scholar
  22. Lamb D., Parrotta J., Keenan R. and Tucker N. 1997. Rejoining habitat fragments: restoring degraded rainforest lands. In: Laurance W.F. and Bierregaard R.O. (eds), Tropical Forest Remnants: Ecology, Management and Conservation of Fragmented Communities. University of Chicago Press, pp. 366–385.Google Scholar
  23. Micleburgh S.P. and Carroll J.B. 1994. The role of captive breeding in the conservation of Old World Fruit Bats. In: Olney P.J.S., Mace G.M. and Feistner A.T.C. (eds), Creative Conservation: Interactive Management of Wild and Captive Animals. Chapman and Hall, London, UK, pp. 352–364.Google Scholar
  24. Phua P.B. and Corlett R.T. 1989. Seed dispersal by the Lesser Short-nosed Fruit Bat (Cymnopterus brachyotis, Pteropodidae, Megachiroptera). Malayan Nature Journal 42: 251–256.Google Scholar
  25. Schmidt L. 2000. Guide to handling of tropical and subtropical forest seed. Danida Forest Tree Centre, Denmark.Google Scholar
  26. Tucker N. and Murphy T. 1997. The effects of ecological rehabilitation on vegetation recruitment: some observations from the Wet Tropics of North Queensland. Forest Ecol. Manage. 99: 133–152.Google Scholar
  27. World Conservation Monitoring Centre 1996. Guide to Information Management in the context of the Convention on Biological Diversity. United Nations Environment Programme, Nairobi, Kenya.Google Scholar
  28. Young A.G., Boshier D. and Boyle T.J. 2000. Forest Conservation Genetics: Principles and Practice. CSIRO Publishing, Australia.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  • David Blakesley
    • 1
  • Kate Hardwick
    • 2
  • Stephen Elliott
    • 3
  1. 1.Horticulture Research InternationalEast Malling, West MallingUK
  2. 2.School of Agricultural and Forest SciencesUniversity of WalesBangorUK
  3. 3.Forest Restoration Research Unit, Biology Department, Science FacultyChiang Mai UniversityThailand

Personalised recommendations