Skip to main content
Log in

Strategic Preemption in a Common Property Resource: A Continuous Time Approach

  • Published:
Environmental and Resource Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The threat of future entry affects the exploitation of common property resources in important ways. An incumbent has a strategic incentive to manipulate the resource stock to deter entry or to harvest more stock prior to entry rather than share the resource with the entrant. It is possible that the threat of potential entry can lead to the extinction of the resource even though actual competition would result in a steady state with a positive stock level.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Berck, P. and J. Perloff (1984), 'An Open-Access Fishery with Rational Expectations', Econometrica 52, 489–506.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bromley, D., ed. (1992), Making the Commons Work: Theory, Policy and Practice. San Francisco: Institute for Contemporary Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bulow, J., J. Geanakoplos and P. Klemperer (1985), 'Holding Idle Capacity to Deter Entry', Economic Journal 95, 178–182.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlos, A. and F. Lewis (1993), 'Depletion in the Lands of the Hudson's Bay Company, 1700-1770', Journal of Economic History 53.

  • Clark, C. (1973), 'Profit Maximization and the Extinction of Animal Species', Journal of Political Economy 81, 950–960.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, C. (1980), 'Restricted Access to Common Property Fishery Resources: A Game Theoretic Analysis', in P.-T. Liu, ed., Dynamic Optimization and Mathematical Economics. New York: Plenum Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, C., F. Clarke and G. Munro (1979), 'The Optimal Exploitation of Renewable Resource Stocks: Some Problems of Irreversible Investment', Econometrica 47, 25–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, C. and G. Munro (1978), 'Renewable Resource Management and Extinction', Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 5, 198–205.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clemhout, S. and H. Wan (1985), 'Cartelization Conserves Endangered Species?' in G. Feichtinger, ed., Optimal Control Theory and Economic Analysis 2. Amsterdam: North Holland Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crabbe, P. and N. V. Long (1993), 'Entry Deterrence and Oberexploitation of the Fishery', Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control 17, 679–704.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dockner, E., G. Feichtinger and A. Mehlmann (1989), 'Noncooperative Solutions for a Differential Game Model of Fishery', Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control 13, 1–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dockner, E. and N. V. Long (1993), 'International Pollution Control: Cooperative Versus Noncooperative Strategies', Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 24, 13–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fudenberg, D. and J. Tirole (1991), Game Theory. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert, R. J. (1989), 'Mobility Barriers and the Value of Incumbency', in R. Schmalensee and R. Willig, eds., Handbook of Industrial Organization, Volume 1. Amsterdam: North Holland Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert, R. J. and S. Goldman (1978), 'Potential Competition and the Monopoly Price of an Exhaustible Resource', Journal of Economic Theory 17, 319–331.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert, R. J. and D. Newbery (1982), 'Preemptive Patenting and the Persistence of Monopoly', American Economic Review 74, 514–526.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gordon, H. S. (1954), 'The Economic Theory of a Common Property Resource', Journal of Political Economy 62, 124–142.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnston, R. and Libecap, G. (1980), 'Agency Costs and the Assignment of Property Rights: The Case of Southwestern Indian Reservations', Southern Economic Journal 47, 332–347.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kamien, M. and N. Schwartz (1991), Dynamic Optimization: The Calculus of Variations and Optimal Control in Economics and Management. Amsterdam: North Holland Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karp, L. (1992), 'Social Welfare in a Common Property Oligopoly', International Economic Review 33, 353–372.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kemp, M. C. and N. V. Long (1980), 'Resource Extraction Under Conditions of Common Access', in M. C. Kemp and N. V. Long, eds., Exhaustible Resources, Optimality and Trade. Amsterdam: North-Holland Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levhari, D. and L. J. Mirman (1980), 'The Great Fish-War: An Example Using the Cournot-Nash Solution', Bell Journal of Economics 11, 322–334.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mason, C. F. and S. Polasky (1994), 'Entry Deterrence in the Commons', International Economic Review 35, 507–525.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mason, C. F. and S. Polasky (1997), 'The Optimal Number of Firms in the Commons: A Dynamic Approach', Canadian Journal of Economics 30, 1143–1160.

    Google Scholar 

  • McLean, J. (1849), Notes of Twenty-Five Year's Service in the Hudson's Bay Territory. London: Richard Bentley.

    Google Scholar 

  • McMillan, J. and H.-W. Sinn (1980), 'Oligopolistic Extraction of a Common-Property Resource: Dynamic Equilibria', in M. C. Kemp and N. V. Long, eds., Exhaustible Resources, Optimality and Trade. Amsterdam: North-Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milgrom, P. and J. Roberts (1982), 'Limit Pricing and Entry under Incomplete Information: An Equilibrium Analysis', Econometrica 50, 443–459.

    Google Scholar 

  • Naito, T. and S. Polasky (1997), Theory and Empirics of Fish Wars: The Case of the Berings Sea Donut Hole. Working paper, Oregon State University.

  • Negri, D. H. (1990), '“Strategy” of the Commons', Natural Resource Modeling 4, 521–537.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ostrom, E. (1990), Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions of Collective Action. Cambridge University Press.

  • Ostrom, E. (2000), 'Collective Actions and the Evolution of Social Norms', Journal of Economic Perspectives 14(3), 137–158.

    Google Scholar 

  • Polasky, S. and O. Bin (2001), 'Entry Deterrence and Signaling in a Nonrenewable Resource Model', Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 42, 235–256.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsutsui, S. and K. Mino (1990), 'Nonlinear Strategies in Dynamic Duopolistic Competition with Sticky Prices', Journal of Economic Theory 52, 136–161.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiggins, S. and G. Libecap (1985), 'Oil Field Unitization: Contractual Failure in the Presence of Imperfect Information', American Economic Review 75, 368–385.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mason, C.F., Polasky, S. Strategic Preemption in a Common Property Resource: A Continuous Time Approach. Environmental and Resource Economics 23, 255–278 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021288205689

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021288205689

Keywords

Navigation