Abstract
The household composition matrix is a representation of the demographic structure of households, specific to age groups of household members and household heads. As such, the matrix reflects also the environmental conditions, housing in particular, that mould households' demographic structure. By specifically depicting the presence of children in households, household composition could be viewed as gauging fertility within the context of housing conditions. This stance is examined in an application to Czech census data for the year 1991, at the commencement of an intense process of socio-economic transformation that accompanied the collapse of communism across Eastern Europe. Within this process, housing had an inadvertent impact upon the structure of households in general, and upon fertility decline in particular. By using the standard matrix representation of household composition, correspondence between trajectories of age-specific fertility and household composition emerge throughout the Czech Republic. This correspondence illustrates the potential household composition analysis carries for fertility measurement and estimation in rapidly changing economic environments.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
Abernethy, V.D. & Penaloza, R. V. (2002). Fertility decline in former “Asian tigers,” Population and Environment, 23, 245–265.
Akkerman, A. (2000). On the Leontief structure of household populations, Canadian Studies in Population, 27, 181–193.
Akkerman, A. (1996). A problem in household composition, Mathematical Population Studies, 6, 3–18.
Anderson, B.A. (2002). Russia faces depopulationř Dynamics of population decline, Population and Environment, 23, 437–464.
Bartlett, H.P. & Phillips, D.R. (1995). Aging in the United Kingdom: a review of demographic trends, recent policy developments and care provision, Korea Journal of Population and Development, 24, 181–195.
Bongaarts, J. (2001). Household size and composition in the developing world in the 1990s. Population Studies, 55, 263–279.
Bonvalet, C. & Lelièvre, E. (1997). The transformation of housing and household structures in France and Great Britain, International Journal of Population Geography, 3, 183–201.
Caselli, G., & Vallin, J. (2001). Une démographie sans limiteř, Population, 56, 51–84.
Congdon, P. (1994). Spatiotemporal analysis of area mortality, Statistician, 43, 513–528.
Council of Europe (1990). Household Structures in Europe, Population Studies No. 22. Council of Europe: Strasbourg.
Český statistický úřad (2001). Předbřžné výsledky sèítání lidu, domř a bytř k 1.3.2001 (Preliminary results of the census of population and housing, March 1, 2001), Publication Code: 4101-01, Prague: Czech Statistical Office.
Český statistický úřad (1950-1999). Pohyb obyvatelstva (Annual publications, Population movement). Prague: Czech or Czechoslovak or Federal Statistical Office.
Český statistický úřad (1995). Sèítání lidu, domř a bytř 1991-Pramenné dílo (Census of population and housing 1991-sources), Serial Number: 8, Series: 25-SLDB, Publication Code 2501. Prague: Czech Statistical Office.
Český statistický úřad (1993). Ú mrtnostní tabulky za ČSFR, ČR a SR za rok 1991 (Life tables for Czechoslovakia, Czech and Slovak Republics in 1991). Česká statistika 4-Demografie. Prague: Czech Statistical Office.
Český statistický úřad (1982). Sèítání lidu, domř a bytř 1980 (Census of population and housing, 1980), November. Prague: Czech Statistical Office.
Český statistický úřad (1975). Sèítání lidu, domř a bytř 1970 (Census of population and housing, 1970). Prague: Czech Statistical Office.
De Simoni, A. (1990). L'évolution récente de la fécondité italienne. Une analyse des tables de fécondité par rang de naissance, Cahiers québécois de démographie, 19, 123–36.
Denton, F. T. & Spencer, B. G. (1999). Population aging and its economic costs: A survey of the issues and evidence, Social and Economic Dimensions of an Aging Population, Research Paper 1, March. Hamilton, Ontario: Department of Economics, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario. http://ideas.uqam.ca/ideas/data/Papers/mcmsedapp1.html
Dumont, G.-F. (2001). Les populations du monde. Paris: Armand Colin.
Ditgen, A. & Legoux, L. (1990). Vieillissement par le haut et par le bas: l'exemple de la France. In Population âgées et révolution grise, Chaire Quetelet 1986, Editions CIACO (pp. 89–103). Louvain, Belgium: Université Catholique de Louvain.
Ermisch, J. & Di Salvo, P. (1997). The economic determinants of young people's household formation, Economica, 64, 627–44.
Frejka, T. & Calot, G. (2001). Cohort reproductive patterns in low-fertility countries, Population and Development Review, 27, 103–132.
Garvey, D. L. & Espenshade, T.J. (1996). Fiscal impacts of New Jersey's immigrant and native households on state and local governments: a new approach and new estimates, OPR Working Paper, No. 96-5, September. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University, Office of Population Research.
Gauthier, A.H. & Hatzius, J. (1997). Family benefits and fertility: An econometric analysis, Population Studies, 51, 295–306.
Himes, C.L. (1992). Social demography of contemporary families and aging, Generations, 17, 13–16.
Kinsella, K. & Velkoff, V.A. (2001). An Aging World: 2001, U.S. Census Bureau, Series P95/ 01-1. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
Kuijsten, A. (1995). Recent trends in household and family structures in Europe: An overview. In Evert van Imhoff et al. (Eds.), Household Demography and Household Modeling (pp. 53–84). New York and London: Plenum Press.
Laws, G. (1994). Implications of demographic changes for urban policy and planning, Urban Geography, 15, 90–100.
Lefebvre, P., Brouillette, L. & Felteau, C. (1994). Comportements de fécondité des Québécoises, allocations familiales et impôts: résultats et simulations d'un modèle de choix discrets portant sur les années 1975-1987, Actualité Economique, 70, 399–451.
Levine, N. (1999). The effects of local growth controls on regional housing production and population redistribution in California, Urban Studies, 36, 2047–2068.
Liddle, B. (2000). Population growth, age structure, and environmental impact, Population and Environment, 21, 385–411.
London, R.A. (1998). Trends in single mothers' living arrangements from 1970 to 1995: Correcting the current population survey, Demography, 35, 125–131.
Lux, M. (2001). History and Challenges of “Social” Rental Housing in the Czech Republic. In M. Lux (Ed.), Social housing in Europe 2000 (pp. 33–48). Prague: Institute of Sociology, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic.
Lux, M. (2000). Housing policy changes and housing expenditures in the Czech Republic, Sociological Papers. Prague: Institute of Sociology, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic.
Martin, J. (1998). Politique familiale et travail des femmes mariées en France. Perspective historique: 1942-1982, Population, 53, 119–53.
Murray, M.S., 1998. Housing conditions of nuclear and extended households in the Miami Fort Lauderdale area, Population and Environment, 20, 55–76.
Myers, G. & Légaré, J. 2000. The behaviour and status of older persons. In Generations and gender programme: Exploring future research and data collection options (pp. 105–124). New York and Geneva: UN Commission for Europe and UN Population Fund, United Nations.
Okun, B.S. (1994). Evaluating methods for detecting fertility-control: Coale and Trussell's model and cohort parity analysis, Population Studies, 48, 193–222.
Paydarfar, A.A. (1995). Effects of multi-family housing on marital fertility in Iran: Population policy implications, Social Biology, 42, 214–225.
Prinz, Ch. (1995). Changing family structure and an emancipatory pension policy: The case of Austria. In J.-P. Gonnot, N. Keilman, and C. Prinz (Eds.), Social security, household, and family dynamics in ageing societies (pp. 149–179). Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer Academic.
Rallu, L. and Toulemon L. (1994). Period fertility measures: The construction of different indices and their application to France, 1946-89, Population (English Selection) 6, 59–130.
Rychtaříková, J. (2000). Demographic transition or demographic shock in recent population trends in the Czech Republicř, Acta Universitatis Carolinae-Geographica, 35, 89–102.
Rychtaříková, J. (1999). Is Eastern Europe experiencing a second demographic transitionř, Acta Universitatis Carolinae-Geographica, 34, 19–44.
Rychtaříková, J. (1998). Analyse nationale et spatiale du comportement procréateur en République Tchèque (fécondité et avortement), 1987-1996. In Régimes démographiques et territoires: les frontières en question, Colloque international de La Rochelle, conference proeedings, Association internationale des démographes de langue française, 9, 22-26 September (pp. 183–202). Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
Rychtaříková, J. (1994). Czech and Slovak Families in the European Context, Journal of Family History, 19, 131–147.
Rychtaříková, J. and Dzúrová, D. (1992). Les disparités géographiques de la mortalité en Tchécoslovaquie, Population, 47, 617–643.
Rychtaříková, J. and Kraus, J. (2001). Fertility and family surveys in countries of the ECE Region, Standard country report, the Czech Republic. Geneva: United Nations Economic Commission for Europe, United Nations Population Fund.
Sanderson, S.K. (2001). An evolutionary interpretation of fertility decline: New evidence. Population and Environment, 22, 555–563.
Spicer, K., Diamond, I., and Ni Bhrolchain, M. (1992). Into the twenty-first century with British households, International Journal of Forecasting (Special Issue), 8, 529–39.
Statistics Canada (1987). Household status-relationship to household reference person. Reference Dictionary. Ottawa: Statistics Canada.
Statistics Canada (1983). Historical statistics of Canada, Section B (Vital Statistics and Health), Catalogue 11-516-XIE (Occasional). Ottawa: Statistics Canada. http://www.statcan.ca/ english/freepub/11-516-XIE/sectiona/toc.htm
Státní ú řad statistický (1965). Sèítání lidu, domř a bytř 1961 (Census of population and housing, 1961). Prague: State Statistical Office.
Stolnitz, G.J. (1992). Demographic aging and labour markets in the ECE region: Main variables and an agenda for research. In G.J. Stolnitz (Ed.), Demographic causes and economic consequences of population aging: Europe and North America, Economic Studies No. 3, UN Commission for Europe and UN Population Fund (pp. 371–379). New York: United Nations.
Tayman, J. (1996). The accuracy of small-area population forecasts based on a spatial interaction land use modeling system, Journal of the American Planning Association, 62, 85–98.
United Nations Development Programme (1999). Human development report, Czech Republic. Prague: Research Institute for Labour and Social Affairs.
Van de Kaa, D. J. (1994). The second demographic transition revisited: Theories and expectations. In G.C.N. Beets et al. (Eds.), Population and family in the Low Countries: Late fertility and other current issues, Netherlands Interdisciplinary Demographic Institute and Centrum voor Bevolkings-en Gezinsstudiën, Publication No. 30 (pp. 81–126). Swets and Zeitlinger: Berwyn, Pennsylvania and Amsterdam, Netherlands.
White, S. and Murdock, S. H. ( 1998). The importance of demographic analyses in state-and local-level policy evaluations: A case study analysis of property taxes in Texas, USA, Population Research and Policy Review, 17, 167–196.
Zhai, Z. (1997). Urbanization and the aging of urban population in China: Trend and countermeasures, Chinese Journal of Population Science, 9, 35–44.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Rychtařiková, J., Akkerman, A. Trajectories of Fertility and Household Composition in the Demographic Profile of the Czech Republic. Population and Environment 24, 225–254 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021287827173
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021287827173