Political Behavior

, Volume 24, Issue 2, pp 93–115 | Cite as

Parties and Partisanship: A 40-Year Retrospective

  • Morris P. Fiorina


The study of political parties and voter partisanship has come full circle in 4 decades. During the 1960s and 1970s numerous scholars advanced the thesis of party decline, contending that party organizations had disintegrated, party influence in government had plummeted, and voter partisanship had eroded. The 1980s and 1990s saw a turnaround in scholarly judgments, however, as first party organizations, then party in government, and finally voter partisanship appeared to strengthen. This article reviews the evidence for the downs and ups of parties, suggesting that the evidence of party resurgence is more equivocal than often realized. The parties subfield currently lacks the theory and theoretical sensitivity that enables us to interpret ambiguous empirical evidence. This contrasts with the congressional subfield where the issues now confronting the parties subfield were recognized a decade ago.

parties partisanship party identification 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Abramson, Paul, and Ostrom, Charles (1991). Macropartisanship: An empirical reassessment. American Political Science Review 85: 181–192.Google Scholar
  2. Adams, Greg (1997). Abortion: evidence of an issue evolution. American Journal of Political Science 41: 718–737.Google Scholar
  3. Aldrich, John (1995). Why Parties? Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  4. Bartels, Larry (2000). Partisanship and voting behavior, 1952-1996. American Journal of Political Science 44: 35–50.Google Scholar
  5. Burnham, Walter Dean (1970). Critical Elections and the Mainsprings of American Politics. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
  6. Burnham, Walter Dean (1989). The Reagan heritage. In Gerald Pomper et al. The Election of 1988: Reports and Interpretations, pp. 1–32. Chatham, NJ: Chatham House.Google Scholar
  7. Campbell, Angus, Converse, Philip, Miller, Warren, and Stokes (1960). The American Voter. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  8. Campbell, Angus, Converse, Philip, Miller, Warren, and Stokes (1966). Elections and the Political Order. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  9. Carmines, Edward, and Stimson, James (1989). Issue Evolution. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Coleman, John (1996). Resurgent or just busy? Party organizations in contemporary america. In John Green and Daniel Shea (eds.), The State of the Parties (2nd ed), pp. 312–326. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
  11. Converse, Philip (1976). The Dynamics of Party Support: Cohort Analyzing Party Identification. Beverly Hills: Sage.Google Scholar
  12. Cotter, Cornelius, Gibson, James, Bibby, John, and Huckshorn, Robert (1984). Party Organizations in American Politics. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
  13. Downs, Anthony (1957). An Economic Theory of Democracy. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  14. Erikson, Robert (1972). Malapportionment, gerrymandering, and party fortunes in congressional elections. American Political Science Review 66: 1234–1245.Google Scholar
  15. Fiorina, Morris (1975). Constituency influence: a generalized model and its implications for statistical studies of roll call behavior. Political Methodology 2: 249–266.Google Scholar
  16. Fiorina, Morris (1981). Retrospective Voting in American National Elections. New Haven: Yale.Google Scholar
  17. Fiorina, Morris (1994). The electorate at the polls in the 1990s. In L. Sandy Maisel (ed.), The Parties Respond (2nd ed.), pp. 123–142. Boulder, CO: Westview.Google Scholar
  18. Fiorina, Morris, Abrams, Samuel, and Pope, Jeremy (2003). The 2000 elections: can retrospective voting be saved? British Journal of Political Science in press.Google Scholar
  19. Green, Donald, and Palmquist, Bradley (1990). Of artifacts and partisan instability. American Journal of Political Science 34: 872–902.Google Scholar
  20. Green, Donald, and Palmquist, Bradley (1994). How stable is party identification? Political Behavior 43: 437–466.Google Scholar
  21. Green, Donald, and Palmquist, Bradley (1998). Macropartisanship: a replication and critique, American Political Science Review 92: 883–99.Google Scholar
  22. Green, Donald, Palmquist, Bradley, and Schickler, Eric. (2002). Partisan Hearts and Minds. New Haven: Yale.Google Scholar
  23. Greenberg, Edward, and Page, Benjamin (1997). The Struggle for Democracy (3rd ed.). New York: Longman.Google Scholar
  24. Hetherington, Marc (2001). Resurgent mass partisanship: the role of elite polarization. American Political Science Review 95: 619–631.Google Scholar
  25. Jackson, John (1975). Issues, party choices, and presidential votes. American Journal of Political Science 19:161–185.Google Scholar
  26. Key, V. O., Jr. (1966). The Responsible Electorate. New York: Vintage.Google Scholar
  27. King, Anthony (1978). The American polity in the late 1970s: building coalitions in the sand. In Anthony King (ed.), The New American Political System pp. 371–395. Washington, DC: AEI.Google Scholar
  28. Krehbiel, Keith (1993). Where's the party? British Journal of Political Science 23: 235–266.Google Scholar
  29. Krehbiel, Keith (1999). Paradoxes of parties in congress. Legislative Studies Quarterly 24: 31–64.Google Scholar
  30. Krehbiel, Keith (2000). Party discipline and measures of partisanship. American Journal of Political Science 44: 212–227.Google Scholar
  31. Layman, Geoffrey (2001). The great divide: religious and cultural conflict in the american political party system. New York: Columbia.Google Scholar
  32. MacKuen, Michael, Erikson, Robert, and Stimson, James (1989). Macropartisanship. American Political Science Review 83: 1125–1142.Google Scholar
  33. MacKuen, Michael, Erikson, Robert, and Stimson, James (1992). Question wording and macropartisanship. American Political Science Review 86: 475–486.Google Scholar
  34. Manley, John (1973). The conservative coalition in congress. American Behavioral Scientist 17: 223–247.Google Scholar
  35. Mayhew, David (1974a). Congressional elections: the case of the vanishing marginals. Polity 3: 295–317.Google Scholar
  36. Mayhew, David (1974b). Congress: The Electoral Connection. New Haven: Yale.Google Scholar
  37. McCarty, Nolan, Poole, Keith, and Rosenthal, Howard (1997). Income Redistribution And the Realignment of American Politics. Washington, DC: AEI Press.Google Scholar
  38. McDonald, Michael, and Popkin, Samuel (2001). The myth of the vanishing voter. American Political Science Review 95: 963–974.Google Scholar
  39. Miller, Warren (1991). Party identification, realignment, and party voting: Back to basics. American Political Science Review 85: 557–568.Google Scholar
  40. Miller, Warren, and Stokes, Donald (1962). Constituency influence in congress. American Political Science Review 57: 45–56.Google Scholar
  41. Nie, Norman, Verba, Sidney, and Petrocik, John (1976). The Changing American Voter. Cambridge: Harvard.Google Scholar
  42. Page, Benjamin, and Jones, Calvin (1979). Reciprocal effects of party preferences, party loyalties, and the vote. American Political Science Review 73: 1071–1089.Google Scholar
  43. Polsby, Nelson, and Schickler, Eric (2002). Landmarks in the study of congress since 1945. Paper presented at the 2001 Annual Meetings of the American Political Science Association. San Francisco.Google Scholar
  44. Riordan, William (1963). Plunkitt of Tammany Hall. New York: Dutton.Google Scholar
  45. Rohde, David (1991). Parties and Leaders in the Postreform House. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  46. Sanbonmatsu, Kira (2002). Democrats, Republicans, and the Politics of Women's Place. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
  47. Schier, Steven (2000). By Invitation Only. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.Google Scholar
  48. Schlesinger, Joseph (1985). The new American party system. American Political Science Review 79: 1152–1169.Google Scholar
  49. Shelley, M. C. (1983). The Permanent Majority: The Conservative Coalition in the United States Congress. Birmingham: University of Alabama Press.Google Scholar
  50. Silbey, Joel (1991). Beyond realignment and realignment theory: American political eras, 1789-1989. In Byron Shafer (ed.), The End of Realignment? pp. 3–23. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
  51. Snyder, James (1992a). Artificial extremism in interest group ratings. Legislative Studies Quarterly 17: 319–345.Google Scholar
  52. Snyder, James (1992b). Committee power, structure-induced equilibria, and roll call votes. American Journal of Political Science 36: 1–39.Google Scholar
  53. Stokes, Donald, and Iversen, Gudmund (1962). On the existence of forces restoring party competition. Public Opinion Quarterly 26: 159–171.Google Scholar
  54. Teixeira, Ruy (1992). The Disappearing American Voter. Washington, DC: Brookings.Google Scholar
  55. Turner, Julius, and Schneier, Edward (1970). Party and Constituency: Pressures on Congress. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  56. Wattenberg, Martin (1996). The Decline of American Political Parties, 1952-1994. Cambridge: Harvard.Google Scholar
  57. Wilson, James Q. (1985). Realignment at the top, dealignment at the bottom. In Austin Ranney (ed.), The American Elections of 1984 pp. 297–310. Washington, DC: AEI.Google Scholar
  58. Wolbricht, Christina (2000). The Politics of Women's Rights: Parties, Positions, and Change. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  59. Zaller, John (1998). Monica Lewinsky's contribution to political science. PS: Political Science &Politics 31: 182–189.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  • Morris P. Fiorina
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Political ScienceStanford UniversityStanford

Personalised recommendations