Abstract
The Thomas precession is calculated using three different transformations to the rotating frame. It is shown that for sufficiently large values of v/c, important differences in the predicted angle of precession appear, depending on the transformation used. For smaller values of v/c these differences might be measured by extending the time of observation.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
L. H. Thomas, “The kinematics of an electron with an axis,” Phil. Mag. 3, 1 (1927).
M. Trocheris, “Electrodynamics in a rotating frame of reference,” Phil. Mag. 40, 1143 (1949).
H. Takeno, “On relativistic theory of rotating disk,” Prog. Theor. Phys. 7, 367 (1952).
S. Kichenassamy and P. Krikorian, “Note on Maxwell's equations in relativistic rotating frames,” J. Math. Phys. 35, 5726 (1994); “The relativistic rotation transformation and pulsar electrodynamics,” Astrophys. J. 431, 715 (1994).
L. Herrera, “The relativistic transformation to rotating frame,” Nuovo Cimento B 115, 307 (2000).
J. Stachel in General Relativity and Gravitation. One Hundred Years After the Birth of Albert Einstein, A. Held, ed. (Plenum, New York, 1980), p. 7.
W. Rindler and V. Perlick, “Rotating coordinates as tools for calculating circular geodesics and gyroscopic precession,” Gen. Rel. Grav. 22, 1067 (1990).
T. Bahder, “Fermi coordinates of an observer moving in a circle in Minkowski space: Apparent behaviour of clocks,” Preprint gr-qc/9811009.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Herrera, L., Di Prisco, A. The Thomas Precession and the Transformation to Rotating Frames. Foundations of Physics Letters 15, 373–383 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021268628566
Received:
Revised:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021268628566