Capitated Assertive Community Treatment Program Savings: System Implications

  • Daniel Chandler
  • Gary Spicer
Article

Abstract

In a California county of one million people, 500 clients, 4% of all those served in 1994, were found to use 38% of publicly funded mental health services. A controlled experiment was designed to test whether a capitated Assertive Community Treatment (ACT) program could produce outcomes that were equivalent or better than “usual services” for a subset of very-high-utilizing clients while reducing costs. Results showed that major challenges in using an ACT program for cost reduction were successfully met. Costs over all 4 years were substantially lower for the experimental group than for a randomly assigned comparison group.

ACT assertive community treatment capitation costs service planning 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

REFERENCES

  1. Brach, C. (1995). Designing capitation for persons with severe mental illness: A policy guide for state and local officials: The Technical Assistance Collaborative, Inc., Boston, MA.Google Scholar
  2. Chandler, D., Hu, T.-W., Meisel, J., McGowen, M., & Madison, K. (1997). Mental health costs, other public costs, and family burden among mental health clients in capitated integrated service agencies. Journal of Mental Health Administration, 24(2), 178-188.Google Scholar
  3. Chandler, D., Meisel, J., Hu, T.-W., McGowen, M., & Madison, K. (1998). Client outcomes in a three-year controlled study of an integrated service agency model. In P. Services (Ed.), Outcome assessment in mental health treatment: A compendium of articles from Psychiatric Services. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association.Google Scholar
  4. Chandler, D., Spicer, G., Wagner, M., & Hargreaves, W. (1999). Cost-effectiveness of a capitated assertive community treatment program. Psychiatric Rehabilitation Journal, 22(4), 327-336.Google Scholar
  5. Chang, C.F., Kiser, L.J., Bailey, J.E., Martins, M., Gibson, W.C., Schaberg, K.A., Mirvis, D.M., & Applegate, W.B. (1998). Tennessee's failed managed care program for mental health and substance abuse services. Journal of the American Medical Association, 279(11), 864-869.Google Scholar
  6. Clark, R.E., & Fox, T.S. (1993). A framework for evaluating the economic impact of case management. Hospital and Community Psychiatry, 44(5), 469-473.Google Scholar
  7. Clark, R.E., Xie, H., Becker, D.R., & Drake, R.E. (1998). Benefits and costs of supported employment from three perspectives. Journal of Behavioral Health Services and Research, 25(1), 22-34.Google Scholar
  8. Dangerfield, D., & Betit, R.L. (1993). Managed mental health care in the public sector. In W. Goldman & S. Feldman (Eds.), Managed mental health care, Vol. 59 (pp. 67-80). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  9. Deci, P.A., Santos, A.B., Hiott, D.W., Schoenwald, S., & Dias, J. (1995). Dissemination of assertive community treatment programs. Psychiatric Services, 46(7), 676-678.Google Scholar
  10. Essock, S.M., Frisman, L.K., & Kontos, N.J. (1998). Cost-effectiveness of assertive community treatment teams. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 68(2), 179-190.Google Scholar
  11. Frank, R.G., McGuire, T.G., & Newhouse, J.P. (1995). Risk contracts in managed mental health care. Health Affairs, 14(3), 51-64.Google Scholar
  12. Hadley, T.R., Culhane, D.P., & McGurrin, M.C. (1992). Identifying and tracking “heavy users” of acute psychiatric inpatient services. Administration and Policy in Mental Health, 19(4), 279-290.Google Scholar
  13. Kapur, K., Young, A.S., Murata, D., Sullivan, G., & Koegel, P. (1999). The economic impact of capitated care for high utilizers of public mental health services: The Los Angeles PARTNERS program experience. Journal of Behavior and Health Services Research, 26(4), 416-429.Google Scholar
  14. Latimer, E.A. (1999). Economic impacts of assertive community treatment: A review of the literature. Canadian Journal of Psychiatry, 44(5), 443-454.Google Scholar
  15. Lehman, A.F., Dixon, L., Hoch, J.S., Deforge, B., Kernan, E., & Frank, R. (1999). Cost-effectiveness of assertive community treatment for homeless persons with severe mental illness. British Journal of Psychiatry, 174, 346-352.Google Scholar
  16. Lurie, N., Christianson, J.B., Gray, D.Z., Manning, W.G., Jr., & Popkin, M.K. (1998). The effect of the Utah Prepaid Mental Health Plan on structure, process, and outcomes of care. New Directions in Mental Health Services (Monograph No. 78), 99-106.Google Scholar
  17. McFarland, B.H., Bigelow, D.A., Smith, J.C., Hornbrook, M.C., Mofidi, A., & Payton, P. (1995). A capitated payment system for involuntary mental health clients. Health Affairs, 14(3), 220-231.Google Scholar
  18. McRae, J., Higgins, M., Lycan, C., & Sherman, W. (1990). What happens to patients after five years of intensive case management stops? Hospital and Community Psychiatry, 41(8), 175-179.Google Scholar
  19. Mueser, K.T., Bond, G.R., Drake, R.E., & Resnick, S.G. (1998). Models of community care for severe mental illness: A review of research on case management. Schizophrenia Bulletin, 241(1), 37-78.Google Scholar
  20. Phillips, S.D., Burns, B.J., Edgar, E.R., Mueser, K.T., Linkins, K.W., Rosenheck, R.A., Drake, R.E., & McDonel Herr, E.C. (2001). Moving assertive community treatment into standard practice. Psychiatric Services, 52(6), 771-779.Google Scholar
  21. Reed, S.K., Hennessy, K., Mitchell, O.S., & Babigian, H.M. (1994). The effects of a mental health capitation program II: Cost-benefit analysis. Hospital and Community Psychiatry, 45, 1097-1103.Google Scholar
  22. Rogers, J.I., Howard, K.J., & Vessey, J.T. (1993). Using significance tests to evaluate equivalence between two experimental groups. Psychological Bulletin, 113(3), 553-565.Google Scholar
  23. Rosenheck, R., Massari, L., & Frisman, L. (1993). Who should receive high-cost mental health treatment and for how long? Schizophrenia Bulletin, 19(4), 843-852.Google Scholar
  24. Rosenheck, R.A., & Neale, M.S. (1998). Cost-effectiveness of intensive psychiatric community care for high users of inpatient services. Archives of General Psychiatry, 55(5), 459-466.Google Scholar
  25. Rothbard, A.B., Schinnar, A.P., Hadley, T.P., Foley, K.A., & Kuno, E. (1998). Cost comparison of state hospital and community-based care for seriously mentally ill adults. American Journal of Psychiatry, 155(4), 523-529.Google Scholar
  26. Salyers, M.P., Masterton, T.W., Fekete, D.M., Picone, J.J., & Bond, G.R. (1998). Transferring clients from intensive case management: impact on client functioning. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 68(2), 233-245.Google Scholar
  27. Schinnar, A.P., Rothbard, A.B., & Hadley, T.R. (1989). Opportunities and risks in Philadelphia's capitation financing of public psychiatric services. Community Mental Health Journal, 25(4), 255-266.Google Scholar
  28. Warner, R., & Huxley, P. (1998). Outcome for people with schizophrenia before and after Medicaid capitation at a community agency in Colorado. Psychiatric Services, 49(6), 802-807.Google Scholar
  29. Weisbrod, B.A., Test, M.A., & Stein, L.I. (1980). Alternative to mental hospital treatment II: Economic benefit-cost analysis. Archives of General Psychiatry, 37, 400-405.Google Scholar
  30. Wolff, N., Helminiak, T.W., & Tebes, J.K. (1997). Getting the cost right in cost-effectiveness analyses. American Journal of Psychiatry, 154(6), 736-743.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Human Sciences Press, Inc. 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  • Daniel Chandler
  • Gary Spicer
    • 1
  1. 1.Alameda County Behavioral Health Care ServicesUSA

Personalised recommendations