Transportation

, Volume 30, Issue 1, pp 81–95 | Cite as

What does a one-month free bus ticket do to habitual drivers? An experimental analysis of habit and attitude change

Abstract

The aim of this study was to investigate whether a temporary structural change would induce a lasting increase in drivers' public transport use. An experiment targeting 43 drivers was carried out, in which a one-month free bus ticket was given to 23 drivers in an experimental group but not to 20 drivers in a control group. Attitudes toward, habits of, and frequency of using automobile and bus were measured immediately before, immediately after, and one month after the one-month long intervention. The results showed that attitudes toward bus were more positive and that the frequency of bus use increased, whereas the habits of using automobile decreased from before the intervention, even one month after the intervention period. Furthermore, the increase in habitual bus use had the largest effect on the increase in the frequency of bus use. The results suggest that a temporary structural change, such as offering auto drivers a temporary free bus ticket, may be an important travel demand management tool for converting automotive travel demand to public-transport travel demand.

automobile use habit travel demand management 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Ajzen I & Fishbein M (1980) Understanding Attitudes and Predicting Social Behavior. NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  2. Ajzen I (1991) The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 50: 179-211.Google Scholar
  3. Ben-Akiva M & Lerman SR (1985) Discrete Choice Analysis. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
  4. Dahlstrand U & Biel A (1997) Pro-environmental habit: Propensity levels in behavioral change. Journal of Applied Social Psychology 27: 588-601.Google Scholar
  5. Everett PB & Watson BG (1987) Psychological contributions to transportation. In: Stokols D & Altman I (eds) Handbook of Environmental Psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 987-1008). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  6. Fishbein M & Ajzen I (1975) Belief, Attitude, Intention, and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
  7. Fujii S, Gärling T & Kitamura R (2001a) Changes in drivers' perceptions and use of public transport during a freeway closure: Effects of temporary structural change on cooperation in a real-life social dilemma. Environment and Behavior 33: 796-808.Google Scholar
  8. Fujii S, Gärling T & Kitamura R (2001b) Breaking habitual defecting by a temporary structural change. Paper presented at the Ninth International Conference on Social Dilemmas, June 29-July 3, Chicago, IL, USA.Google Scholar
  9. Gärling T, Fujii S & Boe O (2001) Empirical tests of a model of determinants of script-based driving choice. Transportation Research F 4: 89-102.Google Scholar
  10. Gärling T, Gärling A & Loukopoulos P (2002) Forecasting psychological consequences of caruse reduction: A challenge to an environmental psychology of transportation. Applied Psychology: An International Review.Google Scholar
  11. Hensher DA & Button KJ (2000) Handbook of Transport Modeling (Vol. 1). Oxford: Pergamon.Google Scholar
  12. Kitamura R, Fujii S & Pas EI (1997) Time use data for travel demand analysis: Toward the next generation of transportation planning methodologies. Transport Policy 4: 225-235.Google Scholar
  13. Komorita SS & Parks CD (1994) Social Dilemmas. Madison, WI: Brown and Benchmark.Google Scholar
  14. Nunnally JC (1978) Psychometric Theory (2nd ed). New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  15. Pas EI (1995) The urban transportation planning process. In: Hanson S (ed) The Geography of Urban Transportation (pp. 53-77). Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
  16. Ronis DL, Yates JF & Kirscht JP (1989) Attitudes, decisions, and habits as determinants of repeated behavior. In: Pratkanis AR, Breckler SJ & Greenwald AG (eds) Attitude Structure and Function (pp. 213-239). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  17. Schank RC & Abelson RP (1977) Scripts, Plans, Goals, and Understanding. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  18. Verplanken B & Aarts H (1999) Habit, attitude and planned behavior: Is habit an empty construct or an interesting case of goal-directed automatic? European Review of Social Psychology 10: 101-134.Google Scholar
  19. Verplanken B & Faes S (1999) Good intentions, bad habits, and effects of forming implementation intentions on health eating. European Journal of Social Psychology 29: 591-604.Google Scholar
  20. Verplanken B, Aarts H & Van Knippenberg A (1997) Habit, information acquisition, and the process of making travel mode choices. European Journal of Social Psychology 27: 539-560.Google Scholar
  21. Verplanken B, Aarts H, van Knippenberg A & van Knippenberg C (1994) Attitude versus general habit: Antecedents of travel mode choice. Journal of Applied Social Psychology 24: 285-300.Google Scholar
  22. Vlek C & Michon J (1992) Why we should and how we could decrease the use of motor vehicles in the near future. IATTS Research 15: 82-93.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Tokyo Institute of TechnologyJapan
  2. 2.Department of Civil EngineeringTokyo Institute of TechnologyTokyoJapan
  3. 3.Kyoto UniversityJapan

Personalised recommendations