Environmental and Resource Economics

, Volume 23, Issue 3, pp 357–378

Structural Decomposition Analysis of Physical Flows in the Economy

  • Rutger Hoekstra
  • Jeroen C.J.M. van den Bergh
Article

Abstract

Many environmental problems can be attributedto the extraction and emissions of physicalsubstances. Increasing our understanding of theeconomic and technological driving forcesbehind these physical flows can contribute tosolving the environmental problems related tothem. The input-output framework is a usefulsetting in which to integrate detailedinformation about economic structure andphysical flows. In this article a specificmethod in input-output analysis is reviewed,namely Structural Decomposition Analysis (SDA).It is based on comparative static analysis,which decomposes historical changes of a policyvariable into determinant effects. SDA has beenapplied, for example, to analyze the demand andtechnological driving forces of energy use,CO2-emissions and various other pollutantsand resources. This article examines thetheoretical aspects of structuraldecomposition, in particular those concerningphysical flows and environmental issues.Furthermore, the article includes an extensivesurvey of empirical studies.

CO2-emissions comparative static analysis energy use environmental analysis input-output analysis material flows physical flows structural change technological change 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Ang, B. W. (1994), 'Decomposition of Industrial Energy Consumption: The Energy Intensity Approach', Energy Economics 16(3), 163–174.Google Scholar
  2. Ang, B. W. (1999), 'Decomposition Methodology in Energy Demand and Environmental Analysis', in J. C. J. M. van den Bergh, ed., Handbook of Environmental and Resource Economics. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishers.Google Scholar
  3. Ang, B. W. and K. H. Choi (1997), 'Decomposition of Aggregate Energy and Gas Emissions Intensities for Industry: A Refined Divisia Index Method', The Energy Journal 18(3), 59–73.Google Scholar
  4. Ang, B. W. and P. W. Lee (1996), 'Decomposition of Industrial Energy Consumption: The Energy Coefficient Approach', Energy Economics 18(1-2), 129–143.Google Scholar
  5. Ang, B. W. and F. Q. Zhang (2000), 'A Survey of Index Decomposition Analysis in Energy and Environmental Studies', Energy 25(12), 1149–1176.Google Scholar
  6. Balk, B. M. (1995), 'Axiomatic Price Index Theory: A Survey', International Statistical Review 63(1), 69–93.Google Scholar
  7. Bouman, M., R. Heijungs, E. van der Voet, J.C.J.M van den Bergh and G. Huppes (2000), 'Material Flows and Economic Models: An Analytical Comparison of SFA, LCA and Partial Equilibrium Models', Ecological Economics 32(2), 195–216.Google Scholar
  8. Boyd, G., J. F. McDonald, M. Ross and D. A. Hanson (1987), 'Separating the Changing Composition of U.S. Manufacturing Production from Energy Efficiency Improvements: A Divisia Index Approach', The Energy Journal 8(2), 77–96.Google Scholar
  9. Bruijn, S. M. de (2000), Economic Growth and the Environment: An Empirical Analysis. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
  10. Casler, S. and A. Rose (1998), 'Carbon Dioxide Emissions in the U.S. Economy', Environmental and Resource Economics 11(3-4), 349–363.Google Scholar
  11. Casler, S. and A. Rose (1999), 'Structural Decomposition Analysis: A Microeconomic Integration. Thoughts on SDA Workshop. Tinbergen Institute Amsterdam, The Netherlands.Google Scholar
  12. Casler, S. D. (2001), 'Interaction Terms and Structural Decomposition: An Application to the Defense Cost of Oil', in M. L. Lahr and E. Dietzenbacher, eds., Input-output: Frontiers and Extensions. United Kingdom: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  13. Chang, Y. F. and S. J. Lin (1998), 'Structural Decomposition of Industrial CO2 Emission in Taiwan: An Input-Output Approach', Energy Policy 26(1), 5–12.Google Scholar
  14. Chen, C. Y. and A. Rose (1990), 'A Structural Decomposition Analysis of Changes in Energy Demand in Taiwan: 1971-1984', The Energy Journal 11(1), 127–146.Google Scholar
  15. Chen, C. Y. and R. H. Wu (1994), 'Sources of Change in Industrial Electricity Use in the Taiwan Economy, 1976-86', Energy Economics 16(2), 115–120.Google Scholar
  16. Chung, H. S. (1998), 'Industrial Structure and Source Of Carbon Dioxide Emissions In East Asia: Estimation And Comparison', Energy & Environment 9(5), 509–533.Google Scholar
  17. Common, M. S. and U. Salma (1992), 'Accounting for Changes in Australian Carbon Dioxide Emissions', Energy Economics 14(3), 217–225.Google Scholar
  18. Dietzenbacher, E. and R. Hoekstra (2002), 'The RAS Structural Decomposition Approach', in G. J. D. Hewings, M. Sonis and D. E. Boyce, eds., Trade, Networks and Hierarchies: Modeling Regional and Interregional Economics. Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
  19. Dietzenbacher, E., A. Hoen and B. Los (2000), 'Labor Productivity in Western Europe 1975-1985: An Intercountry, Interindustry Analysis', Journal of Regional Science 40(3), 425–452.Google Scholar
  20. Dietzenbacher, E. and B. Los (1998), 'Structural Decomposition Techniques: Sense and Sensitivity', Economic Systems Research 10(4), 307–323.Google Scholar
  21. Dietzenbacher, E. and B. Los (2000), 'Structural Decomposition Analyses with Dependent Determinants', Economic Systems Research 12(4), 497–514.Google Scholar
  22. Duchin, F. and A. E. Steenge (1999), 'Input-output Analysis, Technology and the Environment', in J. C. J. M. van den Bergh, ed., Handbook of Environmental and Resource Economics. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishers.Google Scholar
  23. Economic Systems Research (1998), Input-output and the Environment (Special issue), 10(2), June 1998.Google Scholar
  24. Fisher, I. (1922), The Making of Index Numbers: A Study of their Varieties. Tests and Reliability, 3rd ed. New York: M. Kelly.Google Scholar
  25. Gale, L. R. (1995), 'Trade Liberalization and Pollution: An Input-Output Study of Carbon Dioxide Emissions in Mexico', Economic Systems Research 7(3), 309–320.Google Scholar
  26. Garbaccio, R. F., M. S. Ho and D. W. Jorgenson (1999), 'Why Has the Energy-output Ratio Fallen in China?' The Energy Journal 20(3), 63–91.Google Scholar
  27. Giljum, S. and K. Hubacek (2001), International Trade, Material Flows and Land Use: Developing a Physical Trade Balance for the European Union. Interim Report IR-01-059. IIASA, Laxenburg, Austria.Google Scholar
  28. Gould, B. W. and S. N. Kulshreshtha (1986), 'An Interindustry Analysis of Structural Change And Energy Use Linkages in the Saskatchewan Economy', Energy Economics 8(3), 186–196.Google Scholar
  29. Gowdy, J. M. and J. L. Miller (1987), 'Technological and Demand in Energy Use: An Input-Output Analysis', Environment and Planning A 19, 1387–1398.Google Scholar
  30. Gravgård-Pedersen, O. (1999), Physical Input-output Tables for Denmark. Products and Materials 1990, Air Emissions 1990-92. Kopenhagen, Denmark: Statistics Denmark.Google Scholar
  31. Haan, M. de (2001), 'A Structural Decomposition Analysis of Pollution in the Netherlands', Economic System Research 13(2), 181–196.Google Scholar
  32. Han, X. and T. K. Lakshmanan (1994), 'Structural Changes and Energy Consumption in the Japanese Economy 1975-85: An Input-Output Analysis', The Energy Journal 15(3), 165–188.Google Scholar
  33. Hoekstra, R. and J. C. J. M. van den Bergh (2002), 'Comparing Structural Decomposition Analysis and Index Decomposition Analysis', Energy Economics (forthcoming).Google Scholar
  34. Jacobsen, H. K. (2000), 'Energy Demand, Structural Change and Trade: A Decomposition Analysis of the Danish Manufacturing Industry', Economic Systems Research 12(3), 319–343.Google Scholar
  35. Kagawa, S. and H. Inamura (2000), 'Structural Decomposition of Energy Consumption Based on a Hybrid Rectangular I-O Framework - Japan's Case. 13th International Conference on Input-Output Techniques, Macerata, Italy.Google Scholar
  36. Kandelaars, P. P. A. A. H. (1998), Economic Models of Material-Product Chains for Environmental Policy Analysis. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
  37. Konijn, P. J. A., S. de Boer and J. van Dalen (1995), Material Flows and Input-Output Analysis: Methodological Description and Empirical Results. Voorburg, The Netherlands: Sector National Accounts, Statistics Netherlands.Google Scholar
  38. Kruk, R. van der (1999a), An input-output Structural Decomposition Analysis of the Energy Demand of 9 OECD Countries. MSc. Thesis. Erasmus University, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.Google Scholar
  39. Kruk, R. van der (1999b), Decomposition Uniqueness: The Basic Additive Identity Splitting Method. Thoughts on SDA Workshop, Tinbergen Institute Amsterdam, The Netherlands.Google Scholar
  40. Leontief, W. and D. Ford (1972), 'Air Pollution and Economic Structure: Empirical Results of Input-Output Computations', in A. Brody and A. Carter, eds., Input-Output Techniques. North Holland, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.Google Scholar
  41. Lin, X. (1996), China's Energy Strategy: Economic Structure, Technological Choices, and Energy Consumption. Westport: Praeger.Google Scholar
  42. Lin, X. and K. R. Polenske (1995), 'Input-output Anatomy of China's Energy Use Changes in the 1980s', Economic Systems Research 7(1), 67–84.Google Scholar
  43. Linden, J. A. van der and E. Dietzenbacher (1995) The Determinants of Structural Change in the European Union: A New Application of RAS. Working Paper, Groningen, The Netherlands: University of Groningen.Google Scholar
  44. Liu, X. Q., B. W. Ang and H. L. Ong (1992) 'The Application of the Divisia Index to the Decomposition of Changes in Industrial Energy Consumption', The Energy Journal 13(4), 161–177.Google Scholar
  45. Milana, C. (2001), 'The Input-Output Structural Decomposition Analysis of “Flexible” Production Systems', in E. Dietzenbacher and M. L. Lahr, eds., Input-output Analysis: Frontiers and Extensions. UK: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  46. Miller, R. E. and P. D. Blair (1985), Input-Output Analysis: Foundations and Extensions. Englewood-Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  47. Moll, S., F. Hinterberger, A. Femia and S. Bringezu (1998a), Ein Input-output-Ansatz zur Analyse des stofflichen Ressourcenverbrauchs einer Nationalökonomie: Ein Beitrag zur Methodik der volkswirtschaftlichen Materialintensitätsanalyse. 6. Stuttgarter Input-Output Workshop, Stuttgart, Germany.Google Scholar
  48. Moll, S., F. Hinterberger, A. Femia and S. Bringezu (1998b), 'An Input-output Approach to Analyse the Total Material Requirement (TMR) of National Economies', in Conaccount Workshop: Ecologizing Societal Metabolism. Designing Scenarios for Sustainable Materials Management. Amsterdam, The Netherlands.Google Scholar
  49. Mukhopadhyay, K. and D. Chakraborty (1999) 'India's Energy Consumption Changes During 1973/74 to 1991/92', Economic Systems Research 11(4), 423–437.Google Scholar
  50. Nebbia, G. (1999), Contabilià monetaria e contabilità ambientale. Italy: University di Bari.Google Scholar
  51. Nooij, M. de, Kruk, R. van der and D. van Soest (2001), International Comparison of Energy Use: The Usefulness of Structural Decomposition Analysis across Countries. Working paper, Tilburg University, The Netherlands.Google Scholar
  52. Oosterhaven, J. and A. R. Hoen (1998), 'Preferences, Technology, Trade and Real Income Changes in the European Union - An Intercountry Decompoition Analysis for 1975-1985', Annals of Regional Science 32(4), 505–524.Google Scholar
  53. OTA (Office of Technology Assessment) (1990), Energy Use and the Economy. Washington DC: USGPO.Google Scholar
  54. Pløger, E. (1984), The Effects of Structural Changes on Danish Energy Consumption, 5th IIASA Task Force Meeting on input-output modeling, Laxenburg, Austria.Google Scholar
  55. Proops, J. L. R., M. Faber and G. Wagenhals (1993), Reducing CO 2 Emissions: A Comparative Input-output Study for Germany and the UK. Heidelberg, Germany: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
  56. Rose, A. (1999), 'Input-output Decomposition Analysis of Energy and the Environment', in J. C. J. M. van den Bergh, ed., Handbook of Environmental and Resource Economics. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishers.Google Scholar
  57. Rose, A. and S. Casler (1996), 'Input-Output Structural Decomposition Analysis: A Critical Appraisal', Economic Systems Research 8(1), 33–62.Google Scholar
  58. Rose, A. and C. Y. Chen (1991a), 'Sources of Change in Energy Use in the U.S. Economy, 1972- 1982', Resources and Energy 13(1), 1–21.Google Scholar
  59. Rose, A. and C. Y. Chen (1991b), 'Modeling the Responsiveness of Energy Use to Changing Economic Conditions. International Meeting of the Association for Energy Economics (July 1991).Google Scholar
  60. Rose, A., C. Y. Chen and G. Adams (1996), Structural Decomposition Analysis of Changes in Material Demand. Working paper, The Pennsylvania State University, United States.Google Scholar
  61. Rose, A. Z. and S.-M. Lin (1995), 'Regrets or no Regrets-that is the Question: Is Conservation a Costless CO2 Mitigation Strategy?' The Energy Journal 16(3), 67–87.Google Scholar
  62. Siegel, P. B., J. Alwang and T. G. Johnson (1995), 'Decomposing Sources of Regional Growth with an IO Model: A Framework for Policy Analysis', International Regional Science Review 18(3), 331–353.Google Scholar
  63. Stahmer, C., M. Kuhn and N. Braun (1997), Physical Input-Output Tables for Germany, 1990. German Federal Statistical Office, Germany.Google Scholar
  64. Stone, R. (1961), Input-Output and National Accounts. Paris, France: OECD.Google Scholar
  65. Vogt, A. (1978), 'Divisia Indices on Different Paths', in W. Eichhorn, R. Henn, O. Opitz and R.W. Shepard, eds., Theory and Applications of Economic Indices. Heidelberg, Germany: Physica-Verlag.Google Scholar
  66. Vogt, A. and J. Barta (1997), The Making of Tests of Index Numbers: Mathematical Methods of Descriptive Statistics. Heidelberg, Germany: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
  67. Wier, M. (1998), 'Sources of Changes in Emissions from Energy: A Structural Decomposition Analysis', Economic Systems Research 10(2), 99–112.Google Scholar
  68. Wier, M. and B. Hasler (1999), 'Accounting for Nitrogen in Denmark - A Structural Decomposition Analysis', Ecological Economics 30(2), 317–331.Google Scholar
  69. Zheng, Y. (2000), Sources of China's Energy Use Changes in the 1990's, 13th International Conference on Input-Output Techniques, Macerata, Italy.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  • Rutger Hoekstra
    • 1
  • Jeroen C.J.M. van den Bergh
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Spatial EconomicsFree UniversityAmsterdamThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations