Skip to main content
Log in

Professionalism and Politics in High School Teaching Reform

  • Published:
Journal of Educational Change Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper takes the case of math educationreform in California to analyze problems andprospects for reforming high school teaching.The experiences of three math departmentsreveal the profoundly political nature of highschool mathematics reform. First, changing mathinstruction means rejecting established normsfor professional practice in mathematics and inteaching more generally. I argue that radicalteaching reform depends upon professionalismand sustained commitment of teachercommunities, as well as on the knowledge ofreformed practice they generate. Second,successful reform engages politics beyond theteaching profession, as the California ``mathwars'' attest. After describing the course oforganized opposition to a reformed high schoolmath department, I examine the rhetoric andvested interests that figure prominently inparents' mobilization against mathematicsreform. The analysis brings into focus the dualproblems for high school teaching reform ofchanging professional practice and engagingpolitical opposition to educational change. Thestunning success of anti-reform politics inAmerican mathematics education highlights theimportance of activist professionalism inteaching.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Ball, D.L & Rundquist, S.S. (1993). Collaboration as a context for joining teacher learning with learning about teaching. In D.K. Cohen, M.W. McLaughlin & J.E. Talbert (eds), Teaching for Understanding: Challenges for Policy and Practice (pp. 13–42). San Francisco: Jossey Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker, J. & Jacob, B. (2000). California school mathematics politics: The anti-reform of 1997-1999. Phi Delta Kappan (March), 529–537.

  • Boaler, J. (1997). Experiencing School Mathematics: Teaching Styles, Sex and Setting. Buckingham: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boaler, J., Greeno, J. & Talbert, J. (2000). Analytic Essay. Proposal to the Spencer Foundation.

  • Bransford, J.D. Brown, A.L. & Cockings, R.R. (eds) (1999). How People Learn: Brain, Mind, Experience, and School. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coburn, C.E. (2001). Making Sense of Reading: Logics of Reading in the Institutional Environment and the Classroom. Stanford University: Unpublished doctoral dissertation.

  • Cohen, D.K. & Hill, H.C. (2001). Instructional policy and classroom Performance: The mathematics reform in California. Teachers College Record 102(2), 294–343.

    Google Scholar 

  • Committee on Evaluating Undergraduate Teaching (2001). Evaluating, Rewarding and Improving Effective Teaching in Undergraduate Science, Mathematics, Engineering and Technology Washington, DC: National Research Council.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giddens, A. (1994). Beyond Left and Right: The Future of Radical Politics. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guittierez, R. (1996). Practices, beliefs, and cultures of high school mathematics departments: Understanding their influence on student learning. Journal of Curriculum Studies 28(5), 495–529.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hargreaves, A. & Goodson, I. (1996). Teachers' professional lives: Aspirations and actualities. In I.F. Goodson & A. Hargreaves (eds), Teachers' Professional Lives (pp. 1–27). London: Falmer Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heaton, R.M. & Lampert, M. (1993). Learning to hear voices: Inventing a new pedagogy of teacher education. In D.K. Cohen, M.W. McLaughlin & J.E. Talbert (eds), Teaching for Understanding: Challenges for Policy and Practice (pp. 43–83). San Francisco: Jossey Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirkpatrick, J., Swafford, J. & Findell, B. (eds) (2001). Adding It Up: Helping Children Learn Mathematics. Washington, DC: National Academy Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohn, A. (1998). Only for my kid: How privileged parents undermine school reform. Phi Delta Kappan 79(8), 569–577.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lave, J. & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lieberman, J.C. (1997). Enabling Professionalism in High School Mathematics Departments: The Role of Generative Community. Stanford University: Unpublished doctoral dissertation.

  • Little, J.W. (1990). The persistence of privacy: Autonomy and initiative in teachers' professional relations. Teachers College Record 91, 509–536.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lortie, D. (1975). Schoolteacher. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, G. (2001). Surviving the math wars: Reflections from the front lines. Mathematically Sane (website).

  • McLaughlin, M.W. & Talbert, J.E (2001). Professional Communities and theWork of High School Teaching. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McLaughlin, M.W. & Talbert, J.E. (1993). Contexts That Matter for Teaching and Learning: Strategic Opportunities for Meeting the Nation's Goals. Stanford, CA: Center for Research on the Context of Teaching.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (1995). Assessment Standards for School Mathematics. Reston, VA: Author.

  • National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (1991). Professional Standards for Teaching Mathematics. Reston, VA: Author.

  • National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (1989). Curriculum and Evaluation Standards for School Mathematics. Reston, VA: Author.

  • Oakes, J., Wells, A.S. & Associates (1996). Beyond the Technicalities of School Reform: Policy Lessons from Detracking Schools. Los Angeles: UCLA Graduate School of Education and Information Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perry, R.R. (1996). The Role of Teachers' Professional Communities in the Implementation of California Mathematics Reform. Stanford University: Unpublished doctoral dissertation.

  • Rosen, L. (2000). Calculating Concerns. The Politics of Representation in California's “Math Wars”. University of California San Diego: Unpublished doctoral dissertation.

  • Sachs, J. (2000). The activist professional. Journal of Educational Change 1, 77–95.

    Google Scholar 

  • SCANS: The Secretary's Commission on Achieving Necessary Skills (1992). Learning a Living: A Blueprint for High Performance. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Labor.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shifter, D. & Fosnot, C.T. (1993). Reconstructing Mathematics Education. New York: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stein, M.K., Silver, E.A. & Smith, M.S. (1998). Mathematics reform and teacher development: A community of practice perspective. In J.G. Greeno & S.V. Goldman (eds), Thinking Practices in Mathematics and Science Learning (pp. 17–52). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Talbert, J.E.& Perry, R.R. (1994). How department communities mediate math and science reforms. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Education Research Association, New Orleans.

  • Wells, A.S. & Serna, I. (1996). The politics of culture: Understanding of local political resistance in detracking in racially mixed schools. Harvard Educational Review 66(1), 93–118.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning, and Identity. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Talbert, J.E. Professionalism and Politics in High School Teaching Reform. Journal of Educational Change 3, 339–363 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021229929671

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021229929671

Keywords

Navigation