Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Spatial distribution of an undergrowth palm in fragments of the Brazilian Atlantic Forest

  • Published:
Plant Ecology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The occurrence of disturbed sectors may be as important as microscaleedge effects in tropical forests fragments. We considered the spatialdistribution dynamics of life stages (youngs, immatures, and adults) of theacaulescent, endemic palm Attalea humilis Mart. ex.Spreng.in fire-prone fragments of the Brazilian Atlantic forest to investigatepopulation responses to fragment size and fire occurrence. From 1996 to 1999,werecorded the number of individuals in different life stages in adjacent10×10-m plots in two perpendicular transects across each of threefragments of different sizes (1.6, 6.4, and 9.9 ha) in the ReservaNacional de Poço das Antas, Southeastern Brazil. A fire burnt thefragments studied in 1997. Application of Morisita's Index showed clumping atmost scales, with a marked reduction in clumping degree from youngs to adults,apattern not influenced by fragment size. After fire, clumping degree increasedtemporarily among the youngs. No association between life stages was detectedusing presence/absence data. Palm density concentrated in the most disturbedtransect arms, a pattern very little affected by fragment size or fire. Noconsistent relationship between palm density and distance from fragment edgewasdetected for any stage, fragment, or year. We hypothesize that short-distanceseed dispersal by scatterhoarding rodents results in discrete, low-densityclumps of youngs dissociated from reproductive plants. The spatial pattern oflater stages is probably conditioned by the distribution of canopy gaps in thelargest, more closed fragment. In the other fragments, the presence of largedisturbed sectors promotes the formation of large, continuous stands of palms.This pattern would be reinforced by fire, which is known to be recurrent onalready disturbed sites. For the species studied, large-scale variations in theforest structure (degraded vs. preserved fragment sectors) seems to be moreimportant than microscale edge effects.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Augspurger C. 1984. Seedling survival of tropical tree species: interactions of dispersal distance, light-gaps and pathogens. Ecology 65: 1705-1712.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bierregaard R.O., Lovejoy T.E., Kapos V., Santos A.A. and Hutchings R.W. 1992. The biological dynamics of tropical rainforest fragments-A prospective comparison of fragments and continuous forest. BioScience 42: 859-866.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barot S., Gignoux J. and Menaut J.-C. 1999a. Demography of a savanna palm tree: predictions from comprehensive spatial pattern analyses. Ecology 80: 1987-2005.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barot S., Gignoux J. and Menaut J.-C. 1999b. Seed shadows survival and recruitment: how simple mechanisms leads to dynamics of population recruitment curves. Oikos 86: 320-330.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chazdon R.L. 1986. Light variation and carbon gain in rain forest understorey palms. Journal of Ecology 74: 995-1012.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cintra R. 1998. Sobrevivência pós-dispersão de sementes e plântulas de três espécies de palmeiras em relação a presença de componentes da complexidade estrutural da floresta Amazônica. In: Gascon C. and Moutinho P. (eds), Floresta Amazônica: Dinâmica Regeneração e Manejo. MCT/INPA, Manaus, pp. 83-98.

  • Cintra R. and Horna V. 1997. Seed and seedling survival of the palm Astrocaryum murumuruand the legume tree Dipteryx micranthain gaps in Amazonian forest. Journal of Tropical Ecology 13: 257-277.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark D.A. and Clark D.B. 1984. Spacing dynamics of a tropical rain forest tree: evaluation of the Janzen-Connell model. The American Naturalist 124: 769-788.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cochrane M.A. and Schulze M.D. 1999. Fire as a recurrent event in tropical forests of the eastern Amazon: effects on forest structure biomass and species composition. Biotropica 31: 2-16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crome F.H.J. 1997. Researching tropical forest fragmentation: shall we keep on doing what we're doing? In: Laurance W.F. and Bierregaard R.O. (eds), Tropical Forest Remnants: Ecology, Management and Conservation of Fragmented Communities. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp. 485-501.

    Google Scholar 

  • David F.N. and Moore P.G. 1954. Notes on contagious distribution in plant populations. Annals of Botany 18: 47-53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dean W. 1996. Es A Ferro e Fogo-a História e a Devastação da Mata Atlântica Brasileira. Companhia das Letras, São Paulo.

  • Didham R.K. and Lawton J.H. 1999. Edge structure determines the magnitude of changes in microclimate and vegetation structure in tropical forest fragments. Biotropica 31: 17-30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fonseca G.A.B. 1985. The vanishing Brazilian Atlantic forest. Biological Conservation 34: 17-34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forget P.-M. 1990. Seed dispersal of Vouacapoua americana (Caesalpiniaceae) by caviomorph rodents in French Guiana. Journal of Tropical Ecology 6: 459-468.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forget P.-M., Munoz E. and Leigh E.G. 1994. Predation by rodents and bruchid beetles on seeds of Scheelea palms on Barro Colorado island Panama. Biotropica 26: 420-426.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henderson A., Galeano G. and Bernal R. 1995. Field Guide to the Palms of the Americas. Princeton University Press, Princeton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henriques R.P.B. and Sousa E.C.E.G. 1989. Population structure, dispersion and microhabitat regeneration of Carapa guianensisin Northeastern Brazil. Biotropica 21: 204-209.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hogan K.P. 1988. Photosynthesis in two neotropical palm species. Functional Ecology 2: 371-377.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoshizaki T., Suzuki K. and Nakashizuka W. 1999. Evaluation of secondary dispersal in a large-seeded tree Aesculus turbinata: a test of directed dispersal. Plant Ecology 144: 167-176.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howe H.F. and Westley L.C. 1997. Ecology of pollination and seed dispersal. In: Crawley M.J. (ed.), Plant Ecology. Blackwell Science, Oxford, pp. 262-283.

  • Hubbell S.P. 1979. Tree dispersion abundance and diversity in a tropical dry forest. Science 203: 1299-1309.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hurlbert S.H. 1990. Spatial distribution of the montane unicorn. Oikos 58: 257-271.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hutchings M.J. 1997. The structure of plant populations. In: Crawley M.J. (ed.), Plant Ecology. Blackwell Science, Oxford, pp. 325-358.

    Google Scholar 

  • IBDF/FBCN 1981. Plano de Manejo da Reserva Biológica de Poço das Antas. Ministério da Agricultura, Brasília.

  • Janzen D.H. 1970. Herbivores and the number of tree speies in tropical forests. The American Naturalist 104: 501-528.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahn F. 1987. The distribution of palms as a function of local topography in Amazonian terra-firme forests. Experientia 43: 251-259.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kellman M., Tackaberry R. and Meave J. 1996. The consequences of prolonged fragmentation: lessons from tropical gallery forests. In: Schelhas J. and Greenberg R. (eds), Forest Patches in Tropical Landscapes. Island Press, Washington, pp. 37-58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kiltie R.A. 1981. Distribution of palm fruits on a rain forest floor: why white-lipped peccaries forage near objects. Biotropica 13: 141-145.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krebs C.J. 1989. Ecological Methodology. Harper and Row, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krebs C.J. and Brzustowski J. 1998. Krebs/WIN Version 0.94. University of California, ftp://gause.biology.ualberta.ca/pub/jbrzusto/ krebs.

  • Laurance W.F. 2000. Do edge effects occur over large spatial scales? Trends in Ecology and Evolution 15: 134-135.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawson E.J.R. and Poethig R.S. 1995. Shoot development in plants: time for a change. Trends in Genetics 11: 263-268.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lorenzi H., Souza H.M., Medeiros-Costa J.T., Cerqueira L.S.C. and Von Behr N. 1996. Palmeiras no Brasil. Ed. Plantarum, Nova Odessa.

  • Lott R.H., Harrington G.N., Irvine A.K. and Mcintyre S. 1995. Density-dependent seed predation and plant dispersion of the tropical palm Normanbya normanbyi. Biotropica 27: 87-95.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ludwig J.A. and Reynolds J.F. 1988. Statistical Ecology: A Primer on Methods and Computing. John Wiley & Sons, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lykke A.M. and Goudiaby A. 1999. Structure, floristic composition, and conservation potentials of a remnant gallery forest at 'Mare du Dragon', Senegal. Nordic Journal of Botany 19: 561-571.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martínez-Ramos M., Sarukhán J. and Piñero D. 1988. The demography of tropical trees in the context of forest gap dynamics: the case of Astrocaryum mexicanumat Los Tuxtlas tropical rain forest. In: Davy A.J., Hutchings M.J. and Watkinson A.R. (eds), Plant Population Ecology. Blackwell Scientific, Oxford, pp. 293-313.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mori S.A., Boom B.M. and Prance G.T. 1981. Distribution patterns and conservaion of eastern Brazilian coastal forest tree species. Brittonia 33: 233-245.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morisita M. 1962. I-index a measure of dispersion of individual. Research in Population Ecology 4: 1-7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murcia C. 1995. Edge effects in fragmented forests: implications for conservation. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 10: 58-62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oliveira-Filho A.T., Camisão-Neto A.A. and Volpato M.M.L. 1996. Structure and dispersion of four tree populations in an area of montane semideciduous forest in southeastern Brazil. Biotropica 28: 762-769.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oliveira-Filho A.T., Mello J.M. and Scolforo J.R.S. 1997. Effects of past disturbance and edges on tree community structure and dynamics within a fragment of tropical semideciduous forest in south-eastern Brazil over a five-year period (1987-1992). Plant Ecology 131: 45-66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paschoal M. and Galetti M. 1995. Seasonal food use by the neotropical squirrel Sciurus ingramiin southeastern Brazil. Biotropica 27: 268-273.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peres C.A. and Baider C. 1997. Seed dispersal, spatial distribution and population structure of Brazilianut trees (Bertholletia excelsa) in southeastern Amazonia. Journal of Tropical Ecology 13: 595-616.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pizo M.A. 1997. Seed dispersal and predation in two populations of Cabralea canjerana (Meliaceae) in the Atlantic forest of southeastern Brazil. Journal of Tropical Ecology 13: 559-578.

    Google Scholar 

  • Price M.V. and Jenkins S.H. 1986. Rodents as seed consumers and dispersers. In: Murray D.R. (ed.), Seed Dispersal. Academic Press, San Diego, pp. 191-236.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ranta P., Blom T., Niemelä J., Joensuu E. and Siitonen M. 1998. The fragmented Atlantic rain forest of Brazil: size, shape and distribution of forest fragments. Biodiversity and Conservation 7: 385-403.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saunders D.A., Hobbs R.J. and Margules C.R. 1991. Biological consequences of ecosystem fragmentation: a review. Conservation Biology 5: 18-32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saverimuttu T. and Westoby M. 1996. Seedling longevity under deep shade in relation to seed size. Journal of Ecology 84: 681-689.

    Google Scholar 

  • Silva Matos D.M. and Watkinson A.R. 1998. The fecundity, seed, and seedling ecology of the edible palm Euterpe edulis in southeastern Brazil. Biotropica 30: 595-603.

    Google Scholar 

  • Silva Matos D.M., Caluca J.F. and Souza A.F. 1998a. Consequências da fragmentação florestal sobre a densidade e tamanho de indivíduos arbóreos na REBIO de Poço das Antas, RJ. Anais do IV Simpósio de Ecossistemas Brasileiros II: 120-125.

    Google Scholar 

  • Silva Matos D.M., Ramos F.N., Torres M.C., Souza A.F., Fonseca G.D.F.M., Siqueira L.P. et al. 1998b. A fragmentação florestal na Reserva Biológica de Poço das Antas (RJ): uma visão fi-tocêntrica. In: Anais do IV Simpósio de Ecossistemas Brasileiros Volume V. Publicação Aciesp n.104, Águas de Lindóia,, pp. 190-195.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sist P. 1989. Demography of Astrocaryum sciophilum, an understory palm of French Guiana. Principes 33: 142-151.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smythe N. 1970. Relationships between fruiting sasons and seed dispersal method in a neotropical forest. The American Naturalist 104: 25-35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Souza A.F. 2000. Aspectos da Dinâmica de Populações da Palmeira Attalea humilisMart. ex. Spreng. em Fragmentos de Floresta Atlântica Sujeitos ao Fogo. Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Campinas, Brazil.

    Google Scholar 

  • Souza A.F., Martins F.R. and Silva Matos D.M. 2000. Detecting ontogenetic stages of the palm Attalea humilisMart. ex Spreng. in fragments of the Brazilian Atlantic Forest. Canadian Journal of Botany 78: 1227-1237

    Google Scholar 

  • Sterner R.W., Ribic C.A. and Schatz G.E. 1986. Testing for life historical changes in spatial patterns of four tropical tree species. Journal of Ecology 74: 621-633.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stuefer J.F. 1996. Potential and limitations of current concepts regarding the response of clonal plants to environmental heterogeneity. Vegetatio 127: 55-70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Svenning J.-C. 1998. The effect of land-use on the local distribution of palm species in an Andean rain forest fragment in northwestern Ecuador. Biodiversity and Conservation 7: 1529-1537.

    Google Scholar 

  • SYSTAT 1998. Standard Version, Version 9. SPSS Inc, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Takizawa F. 1995. Levantamento Pedológico e Zoneamento Ambiental da Reserva Biológica de Poço das Antas. Escola Superior de Agricultura, Luiz de Queiroz, Monografia da Disciplina de Residência Florestal.

  • Taylor L.R. and Taylor R.A.J. 1977. Aggregation, migration and population mechanics. Nature 265: 415-421.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tomlinson P.B. and Jeffrey E.C. 1990. The Structural Biology of Palms. Clarendon Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • USDA 1990. Keys to Soil Taxonomy by Soil Survey Staff. 4th edn. Blacksburg Soil Environmental Sciences Department, Polytechnic Institute and State University.

  • Viana V.M. and Tabanez A.A.J. 1996. Biology and conservation of forest fragments in the Brazilian Atlantic moist forest. In: Schelhas J. and Greenberg R. (eds), Forest Patches in Tropical Landscapes. Island Press, Washington, pp. 151-167.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walter H. 1971. Ecology of Tropical and Subtropical Vegetation. Oliver & Boyd, Edinburgh.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whelan R.J. 1995. The Ecology of Fire. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 346p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilkinson L. 1999. Crosstabulation. Statistics I. SYSTAT 9 user's guide. SPSS Inc, Pp. 157–203.

  • Wilson D.E. and Janzen D.H. 1972. Predation on Scheelea palm seeds by bruchid beetles: seed desity and distance from the parent palm. Ecology 53: 954-959.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zar J.H. 1996. Biostatistical Analysis. Prentice Hall, New Jersey.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Departamento de Botânica, IB, Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ecologia, Caixa Postal 6109, Campinas, 13083–970, Brazil

    Alexandre F. Souza, Alexandre F. Souza, Fernando R. Martins & Fernando R. Martins

Authors
  1. Alexandre F. Souza
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Fernando R. Martins
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Fernando R. Martins.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Souza, A.F., Martins, F.R. Spatial distribution of an undergrowth palm in fragments of the Brazilian Atlantic Forest. Plant Ecology 164, 141–155 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021229832634

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021229832634

Search

Navigation