Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Clinical application in routine practice of the proximal flow convergence method to calculate the mitral surface area in mitral valve stenosis

  • Published:
The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background: Two-dimensional (2D) echocardiography planimetry, the Doppler pression half-time (PHT), and the continuity equation methods were used to estimate mitral valve area (MVA) in patients with mitral stenosis (MS). Recently, the proximal isovelocity surface area (PISA) method has been shown to be accurate for calculating MVA. The purpose of this study is (1) to compare in a large non-selected population the accuracy of the PISA and planimetry methods for echocardiographic estimation of MVA; (2) to determine the effect of atrial fibrillation (AF), Wilkins score, associated mitral regurgitation (MR), aortic regurgitation (AR), and of commissural calcifications on the accuracy of the PISA method. Methods: One hundred and eight consecutive patients with rheumatic MS were studied (76 females and 32 males; mean age: 36 ± 12 years); 64 were in sinus rhythm; 51 had associated MR and 46 had AR. By the PISA method, MVA was calculated assuming a uniform radius flow convergence region along a hemispherical surface. Results: The mean value of 2D MVA was 1.32 ± 0.59 cm2 (0.4–3.1 cm2) and that of PISA MVA 1.33 ± 0.62 cm2 (0.38–3 cm2). MVA calculated using the PISA method correlated well with 2D MVA (r = 0.93, y = 0.97x + 0.04, p < 0.0001, SEE = 0.21 cm2). The correlation was also good in patients with AF (r = 0.93, y = 0.99x + 0.03, p < 0.0001, SEE = 0.21 cm2), with MR (r = 0.94, y = 1.014x + 0.003, p < 0.0001, SEE = 0.19 cm2), with AR (r = 0.93, y = 0.90x + 0.11, p < 0.0001, SEE = 0.2 cm2), when Wilkins score was >8 (r = 0.92, y = 0.96x + 0.06, p < 0.0001, SEE = 0.19 cm2), and in patients with commissural calcifications (r = 0.90, y = 0.88x + 0.009, p < 0.0001, SEE = 0.20 cm2). Conclusion:Our study shows that in routine practice, MVA calculated by the PISA method correlated well with the area obtained by planimetry even in the presence of commissural calcifications, associated MR, AR, AF and of high Wilkins score. Therefore, the PISA method provides a reliable measurement of the MVA in MS under different anatomic and clinical conditions and may be a useful alternative method for calculating MVA.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Henry WL, Griffith JM, Michaels LL, Mc Intich CL, Morrow AG, Epstein SE. Measurement of mitral orifice area in patients with mitral valve disease by real time twodimensional echocardiography. Circulation 1975; 51: 827–831.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Nichol PM, Gilbert BW, Kisslo JA. Two-dimensional echocardiographic assessment of mitral stenosis. Circulation 1977; 55: 120–128.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Martin RP, Rakowski H, Kleiman JH, Beaver W, London E, Popp RL. Reliability and reproductibility of two-dimensional echocardiographic measurement of the stenotic mitral valve area. Am J Cardiol 1979; 43: 560–568.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Smith MD, Handshoe R, Handshoe S, Kwan OL, De Maria AN. Comparative accuracy of two-dimensional echocardiography and Doppler pressure half-time methods in assessing the severity of mitral stenosis in patients with and without prior commissurotomy. Circulation 1986; 73: 100–107.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Nakatani S, Masuyama T, Kodama K, Katabatake A, Fuji K, Takenobu K. Value and limitations of Doppler echocardiography in the quantification of stenotic mitral valve area: comparison of the pressure half-time and the continuity equation methods. Circulation 1988; 77: 78–85.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Flachskampf FA, Weyman AE, Gillam L, Chun-Ming L, Abascal V, Thomas JD. Aortic regurgitation shortens Doppler pressure half-time in mitral stenosis. J Am Coll Cardiol 1990; 16: 396–404.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Karp K, Teien D, Bjerle P, Erikson P. Reassessment of valve area determination in mitral stenosis by the pressure halftime: impact of left ventricular stiffness and peak diastolic pressure difference. J Am Coll Cardiol 1989; 13: 594–599.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Thomas JD, Weyman AE. Doppler mitral pressure halftime: a clinical tool in search of theoretical justification. J Am Coll Cardiol 1987; 10: 923–929.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Rodriguez L, Thomas S, Monterroso V, Weyman AE, Horrigan P, Mueller LN. Validation of the proximal flow convergence method: calculation of orifice area in patients with mitral stenosis. Circulation 1993; 88: 1157–1165.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Utsunomiya T, Ogawa T, Tang HA, Henry WL, Gardin JM. Doppler color flow mapping of the proximal isovelocity surface area: a new method for measuring volume flow rate across a narrowed orifice. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 1991; 4: 338–348.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Rifkin R, Harper K, Tighe D. Comparison of proximal isovelocity surface area method with pressure half time and planimetry in evaluation of mitral stenosis. J Am Coll Cardiol 1995; 26: 458–465.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Miyatake K, Izumi S, Okamoto M. Semiquantitative grading of severity of mitral regurgitation by real time two dimensional Doppler flow imaging technique. J Am Coll Cardiol 1986; 7: 82–88.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1986; 1: 307–310.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Utsunomiya T, Doshi R, Patel D, Mehta K, Nguyen D, Henry W. Calculation of volume flow rate by the proximal isovelocity surface area method: simplified approach using color Doppler zero baseline shift. J Am Coll Cardiol 1993; 22: 277–282.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Shandas R, Gharib M, Liepmann D, Shiota T, Sahn DJ. Experimental studies to define geometry of the flow convergence region. Echocardiography 1992; 9: 43–50.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Flachskampf FA, Weyman AE, Guerrero JL, Thomas J. Calculation of atrioventricular comliance from the mitral profile: analytic and vitro study. J Am Coll Cardiol 1992; 19: 998–1004.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Utsunomiya T, Ogawa T, Doshi R, Patel D, Quan M, Henry W. Doppler color flow proximal isovelocity surface area method for estimating volume flow rate: effects of the orifice shape and machine factors. J Am Coll Cardiol 1991; 17: 1103–1111.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Shiota T, Jones M, Valdez-Cruz L, Schandas R, Yamada I, Sahn D. Color flow Doppler determination of transmitral flow orifice area in mitral stenosis: experimental evaluation of the proximal flow convergence method. Am Heart J 1995; 129: 114–123.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Yoganathan A, Cape E, Sung HW, Williams FP, Jimoh A. Review of hydrodynamic principles for the cardiologist: application to the study of blood and jet by imaging techniques. J Am Coll Cardiol 1988; 12: 1344–1353.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Deng Y, Matsumoto M, Wang X, Liu L, Takizawa S, Takekoshi N. Estimation of mitral valve area in patients with mitral stenosis by the flow convergence region method: selection of the aliasing velocity. J Am Coll Cardiol 1994; 24: 683–689.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Vandervoort PM, Rivera JM, Mele D. Application of color Doppler flow mapping to calculate effective regurgitant orifice area: an in-vitro study and initial clinical observations. Circulation 1993; 88: 1150–1156.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Degertekin M, Basaran Y, Gencbay M, Yaymaci B, Dindar I, Turan F. Validation of flow convergence region method in assessing mitral valve area in the course of transthoracic and tranoesophageal echocardiographic studies. Am Heart J 1998; 135: 207–214.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Nishimura RA, Rihal CS, Tajik J, Holmes D. Accurate measurement of transmitral gradient in patients with mitral stenosis: a simultaneous catheterization and Doppler echocardiographic study. J Am Coll Cardiol 1994; 24: 152–158.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Carabello BA. Advances in the hemodynamic assessment of stenotic cardiac valves. J Am Coll Cardiol 1987; 10: 912–919.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Smith MD, Handshoe R, Handschoe S, Kwan OL, De Maria AN. Comparative accuracy of two-dimensional echocardiography and Doppler pressure half-time methods in assessing severity of mitral stenosis in patient with and without prior commissurotomy. Circulation 1986; 73: 100–107.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Center of Cardiology, CHU Ibn Rochd, Casablanca, Morocco

    Ahmed Bennis, Abdennasser Drighil & Nacer Chraibi

  2. Centre Hospitalier Universitaire d'Amiens, France

    Christophe Tribouilloy

  3. University Hassan II, LPSCM, Casablanca, Morroco

    Asmaa Drighil

Authors
  1. Ahmed Bennis
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Abdennasser Drighil
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Christophe Tribouilloy
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Asmaa Drighil
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Nacer Chraibi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bennis, A., Drighil, A., Tribouilloy, C. et al. Clinical application in routine practice of the proximal flow convergence method to calculate the mitral surface area in mitral valve stenosis. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 18, 443–451 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021197022688

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021197022688

Search

Navigation