Abstract
Microcrystalline cellulose (avicel) was treated in supercritical waterusing batch-type and flow-type systems. The flow-type system made it possibletoshorten the heating, treating and cooling times, compared with the batch-typesystem. As a result, the flow-type system was able to liquefy avicel withoutproducing any supercritical water-insoluble residue. Although hydrolyzedproducts such as glucose and fructose, and pyrolyzed products such aslevoglucosan, 5-hydroxymethyl furfural, erythrose, methylglyoxal,glycolaldehydeand dihydroxyacetone were found in common from the water-soluble portiontreatedby both systems, the flow-type system gave a water-soluble portion with morehydrolyzed and less pyrolyzed products, together with water-solubleoligosaccharides consisting of cellobiose to cellododecaose and theirdecomposedproducts at their reducing end of glucose, such as[β–glucopyranosyl]1–11 β–levoglucosan,[β–glucopyranosyl]1–11 β–erythrose and[β–glucopyranosyl]1–11 β–glycolaldehyde. Inaddition, the precipitates of polysaccharides were recovered after 12h setting of the water-soluble portion. These results indicatedthat the flow-type system can hydrolyze cellulose with minimizing pyrolyzedproducts. On the other hand, the batch-type system resulted in a higher yieldof the pyrolyzed products due to the longer treatment, but a higher yield ofglucose due possibly to the higher pressure and concomitantly higher ionicproduct of water. Based on these lines of evidence, the process to increase theyield of the sugar is discussed under supercritical water treatment.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Antal M.J. and Mok W.S.L. 1990. Mechanism of formation of 5-(hydroxymethyl)-2-furaldehyde from D-fructose and sucrose. Carbohydr. Res. 199: 91–109.
Chang V.S. and Holtzapple M.T. 2000. Fundamental factors affecting biomass enzymatic reactivity. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 84–86: 5-37.
Ehara K., Saka S. and Kawamoto H. 2002. Characterization of the lignin-derived products from wood as treated in supercritical water. J. Wood Sci. 48: 320–325.
Goldstein I.S. 1980. The hydrolysis of wood. Tappi 63: 141–143.
Hill D., Le T., Darvebiza M. and Saha T. 1995. A study of degradation of cellulosic insulation: molecular weight study of cellulose insulation paper. Polym. Deg. Stab. 48: 78–87.
Holzapfel W.B. 1969. Effect of pressure and temperature on the conductivity and ionic dissociation of water up to 100 kbar and 1000 °C. J. Chem. Phys. 50: 4424–4428.
Ishikawa Y. and Saka S. 2001. Chemical conversion of cellulose as treated in supercritical methanol. Cellulose 8: 189–195.
Isogai A. and Usuda M. 1991. Preparation of low-molecular weight celluloses using phosphoric acid. Mokuzai Gakkaishi 37: 339–344.
Kabyemela B.M., Takigawa M., Adchiri T., Malaluan R. and Arai K. 1998. Mechanism and kinetics of cellobiose decomposition in sub-and supercritical water. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 37: 357–361.
Kabyemela B.M., Adchiri T., Malaluan R. and Arai K. 1999. Glucose and fructose decomposition in subcritical water and super-critical water: detailed reaction pathway, mechanisms, and kinetics. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 38: 2888–2895.
Lindsay W.T. 1981. Hydrogen bonding and water structure. In: Cohen P. (ed.), The ASEME Handbook on Water Technology for Thermal Power Systems. ASEME, New York, p. 371.
Luijkx G.C.A., van Rantwijk F., van Bekkum H. and Antal M.J. 1995. The role of deoxyhexonic acids in the hydrothermal de-carboxylation of carbohydrates. Carbohydr. Res. 272: 191–202.
Mele A. and Malpezzi L. 2000. Noncovalent association phenomena of 2,5-dihydroxybenzoic acid with cyclic and linear oligosaccharides. A matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometric and X-ray crystallographic study. J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom. 11: 228–236.
Parisi F. 1989. Advances in lignocellulosics hydrolysis and in the utilization of the hydrolyates. Adv. Biochem. Eng./Biotechnol. 38: 53–87.
Saka S. 2001. Post-petrochemistry by supercritical water treatment of woody biomass (in Japanese). Mokuzai Kougyou 56: 105–110.
Saka S. and Konishi R. 2000. Chemical conversion of biomass re-sources to useful chemicals and fuels by supercritical water treatment. In: Bridgwater A.V. (ed.), Progress in Thermochemical Biomass Conversion. Blackwell Science, Oxford, UK, pp. 1338–1348.
Saka S. and Ueno T. 1999. Chemical conversion of various cellu-loses to glucose and its derivatives in supercritical water. Cellulose 6: 177–191.
Sakaki T., Shibata M., Miki T., Hirosue H. and Hayashi N. 1996a. Decomposition of cellulose in near-critical water and ferment-ability of the products. Energy Fuels 10: 684–688.
Sakaki T., Shibata M., Miki T., Hirosue H. and Hayashi N. 1996b. Reaction model of cellulose decomposition in near-critical wa-ter and fermentation of products. Biores. Technol. 58: 197–202.
Sasaki M., Kabyemele B., Malaluan R., Hirose S., Takeda N., Adshiri T. et al. 1998. Cellulose hydrolysis in subcritical and supercritical water. J. Supercritical Fluids 13: 261–268.
Sasaki M., Fang Z., Fukushima Y., Adshiri T. and Arai K. 2000.Dissolution and hydrolysis of cellulose in subcritical and supercritical water. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 39: 2883–2890.
Sumi T., Sakaki T., Ohba H. and Shibata M. 2000. Application of matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry to insoluble glucose oligomers in decomposed cellulose. Rapid Commun. Mass Spectrom. 14: 1823–1827.
Tsujino J., Kawamoto H. and Saka S. 2002. Reactivity of lignin in supercritical methanol studied with some lignin model compounds. Wood Sci. Technol. (in press).
Walsum G.P.V., Allen S.G., Spencer M.J., Laser M.S., Antal M.J. and Lynd L.R. 1996. Conversion of lignocellulosics pretreated with liquid hot water to ethanol. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 57/58: 157–170.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ehara, K., Saka, S. A comparative study on chemical conversion of cellulose between the batch-type and flow-type systems in supercritical water. Cellulose 9, 301–311 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021192711007
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021192711007