Abstract
Colvin (2000) argues that thepropensity for chronic criminal behaviorresults from developmental andsocialization processes that ultimatelyoriginate in the application of erraticcoercive control. He further argues thatthis process operates at multiple levels(i.e., individual, group, andorganizational). In addition, he arguesthat the relationship between the types ofcontrol and criminal behavior is mediatedthrough intergenerational and developmentaleffects, suggesting that the control typethat has the greatest effect on behavior isone that will be passed on to the nextindividual, group, or organization.In this paper, we critique the theoryproposed by Colvin. First, we summarizethe theory. Second, we categorize it interms of its relationship to other types ofcriminology theories. Third, we criticizeit for failing to sufficiently specify itsempirical assertions in order to facilitateempirical testing, and we suggest sixhypotheses that we think capture at least asmall portion of the theory itself.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Agnew, Robert, “Foundation for a General Strain Theory of Crime and Delinquency,” Criminology 1992 (30), 47–87.
Agnew, Robert and White, Helene Raskin, “An Empirical Test of General Strain Theory,” Criminology 1992 (30), 475–499.
Bernard, Thomas J., “Control Criticisms of Strain Theories,” Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency 1984 (21:4), 353–372.
Bernard, Thomas J., “Testing Structural Strain Theories,” Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency 1987 (24:4), 264–270.
Bernard, Thomas J., “Twenty Years of Testing Theories,” Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency 1990 (27:4), 325–347.
Bernard, Thomas J. and Snipes, Jeffrey B., “Theoretical Integration in Criminology,” Crime and Justice: A Review of Research 1996 (20), 301–348.
Bernard, Thomas J. and Shepard Engel, Robin, “Conceptualizing Criminal Justice Theories.” Justice Quarterly 2001 (18:1), 1–30.
Colvin, Mark, Crime and Coercion (New York: St. Martin's Press, 2001).
Gibbs, Jack, “The Methodology of Theory Construction in Criminology,” in Robert F. Meier, ed., Theoretical Methods in Criminology (Beverly Hills, CA: Sage, 1985) pp. 23–50.
Gottfredson, Michael R. and Travis Hirschi, A General Theory of Crime (Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 1990).
Hirschi, Travis, Causes of Delinquency (Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 1969).
Merton, Robert K., Social Theory and Social Structure (Glencoe, Ill: The Free Press, 1968).
Sampson, Robert and John Laub, Crime in the Making (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1993).
Tittle, Charles R., Control Balance (Boulder, CO: Westview, 1995).
Vold, George, Thomas J. Bernard and Jeffrey B. Snipes, Theoretical Criminology (New York: Oxford, 1998).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Daktari Alexander, A., Bernard, T.J. A critique of Mark Colvin's, crime and coercion: An integrated theory of chronic criminality. Crime, Law and Social Change 38, 389–398 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021171925227
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021171925227