Skip to main content
Log in

The Determinants of Debt Maturity at Issuance: A System-Based Model

  • Published:
Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We examine the determinants of corporate debt maturity while taking into account the interdependent relation between maturity and leverage. We do this by estimating a simultaneous-equations model on debt maturity and leverage for a sample of bond-issuing firms. To compare with previous studies, we also estimate a single-equation model on debt maturity using OLS. We define debt maturity as either the maturity of bonds at issuance (incremental approach), or the percentage of a firm's total debt that matures in more than three years (balance-sheet approach). Corroborating the findings of many previous studies, our single-equation OLS results support the underinvestment hypothesis purporting that firms with greater growth opportunities have shorter-term debt. However, under the simultaneous-equations model, the negative relation between a firm's debt maturity and its growth opportunities ceases to hold. Instead, it is the leverage decision that is influenced by growth opportunities. This suggests that existing models may overestimate the effect of growth opportunities on debt maturity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Barclay, M. J. and C. W. Smith, “The Maturity Structure of Corporate Debt.” Journal of Finance 50, 609-632, (1995).

    Google Scholar 

  • Barclay, M. J., L. M. Marx and C. W. Smith, The Joint Determination of Leverage and Maturity. Working paper, University of Rochester, October 2001.

  • Barnea, A., R. A. Haugen and L. W. Senbet, “A Rational for Debt Maturity Structure and Call Provisions in the Agency Theoretic Framework.” Journal of Finance 35, 1223-1234, (1980).

    Google Scholar 

  • Brick, I. E. and S. A. Ravid, “On the Relevance of Debt Maturity Structure.” Journal of Finance 40, 1423-1438, (1985).

    Google Scholar 

  • Brick, I. E. and S. A. Ravid, “Interest Rate Uncertainty and the Optimal Debt Maturity Structure.” Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis 26, 63-82, (1991).

    Google Scholar 

  • Diamond, D., “Debt Maturity Structure and Liquidity Risk.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 106 (August), 709-737, (1991).

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, E. O., R. Heinkel and J. Zechner, “Dynamic Capital Structure Choice: Theory and Test.” Journal of Finance 44, 19-40, (1989).

    Google Scholar 

  • Flannery, M., “Asymmetric Information and Risky Debt Maturity Choice.” Journal of Finance 41, 19-38, (1986).

    Google Scholar 

  • Flannery, M., “Debt Maturity and the Deadweight Cost of Leverage: Optimally Financing Banking Firms.” American Economic Review 84, 320-332, (1994).

    Google Scholar 

  • Greene, W. H., Econometric Analysis, third edition, Prentice Hall, 1997.

  • Guedes, J. and T. Opler, “The Determinants of the Maturity of Corporate Debt Issues.” Journal of Finance 51, 1809-1833, (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kane, A., A. J. Marcus and R. L. McDonald, “Debt Policy and the Rate of Return Premium of Leverage.” Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis 20, 479-500, (1985).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, C. S., D. C. Mauer and M. H. Stohs, “Corporate Debt Maturity Policy and Investor Tax-timing Options: Theory and Evidence.” Financial Management 24, 33-46, (1995).

    Google Scholar 

  • King, T.-H. D. and D. C. Mauer, “Corporate Call Policy for Nonconvertible Bonds.” Journal of Business 73, 403-444, (2000).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, W. L., A. V. Thakor and G. Vora, “Screening, Market Signaling, and Capital Structure Theory.” Journal of Finance 38, 1507-1518, (1983).

    Google Scholar 

  • Leland, H. and K. Toft, “Optimal Capital Structure, Endogenous Bankruptcy, and the Term Structure of Credit Spreads.” Journal of Finance 51, 987-1020, (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  • Marr, M. W. and J. P. Ogden, “Market Imperfections and the Choices of Maturity and Call Provisions in Corporate Debt.” Journal of Business Research 19, 17-32, (1989).

    Google Scholar 

  • Mauer, D. C. and S. H. Ott, “Agency Costs, Underinvestment, and Optimal Capital Structure: The Effect of Growth Options to Expand,” in M. J. Brennan and L. Trigeorgis (Eds), Project Flexibility, Agency, and Competition: New Developments in the Theory and Application of Real Options, New York, NY: Oxford University Press, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, K., “The Call, Sinking Fund, and Term-To-Maturity Features of Corporate Bonds: An Empirical Investigation.” Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis 26, 201-222, (1991).

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, K., “The Debt Maturity Choice: An Empirical Investigation.” Journal of Financial Research 16, 309-320, (1993).

    Google Scholar 

  • Morris, J., Factors Affecting the Maturity Structure of Corporate Debt. Working paper, University of Colorado at Denver, January 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  • Myers, S. C., “Determinants of Corporate Borrowing.” Journal of Financial Economics 5, 147-175, (1977).

    Google Scholar 

  • Myers, S. C., “The Capital Structure Puzzle.” Journal of Finance 39, 575-592, (1984).

    Google Scholar 

  • Myers, S. C. and N. Majluf, “Corporate Financing and Investment Decisions When Firms Have Information Investors Do Not Have.” Journal of Financial Economics 13, 187-221, (1984).

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, W. H., “Regression Standard Errors in Clustered Samples.” Stata Technical Bulletin 13, 19-23, (1993).

    Google Scholar 

  • Scherr, F. C. and H. M. Hulburt, “The Debt Maturity Structure of Small Firms.” Financial Management 30, 85-111, (2001).

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, C. W., Jr., “Investment Banking and the Capital Acquisition Process.” Journal of Financial Economics 15, 3-29, (1986).

    Google Scholar 

  • Stohs, M. H. and D. C. Mauer, “The Determinants of Corporate Debt Maturity Structure.” Journal of Business 69, 279-313, (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  • Titman, S. and R. Wessels, “The Determinants of Capital Structure Choice.” Journal of Finance 43, 1-19, (1988).

    Google Scholar 

  • White, H., “AHeteroskedasticity-ConsistentCovariance Matrix Estimator and a DirectTest for Heteroskedasticity.” Econometrica 48, 817-830, (1980).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Elyasiani, E., Guo, L. & Tang, L. The Determinants of Debt Maturity at Issuance: A System-Based Model. Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting 19, 351–377 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021161309198

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021161309198

Navigation