Skip to main content
Log in

Three approaches to teaching business ethics

  • Published:
Teaching Business Ethics

Abstract

The question on what the purpose of teachingbusiness ethics should be, never fails todivide opinion. In this article three basicpositions taken with regard to this questionare distinguished. They are the cognitivecompetence, the behavioural competence and themanagerial competence positions. Once the coreof each these positions has been identified,the ontological presuppositions underlying eachof them is retrieved. It is then argued thatthese three positions and their accompanyingpresuppositions should not be regarded as rivalpositions, but as complementary approaches inteaching business ethics. Finally the teachingstrategies required by each of these threepositions are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Adams, J. S., C. Harris and S. S. Carley: 1998, 'Challenges in Teaching Business Ethics: Using Role Set Analysis of Early Career Dilemmas', Journal of Business Ethics 17(12), 1325–1335.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, J.: 1997, 'What Cognitive Science Tells us about Ethics and the Teaching of Ethics', Journal of Business Ethics 16, 279–291.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berger, J. and C. B. Pratt: 1998, 'Teaching Business Ethics - Communication Ethics with Controversial Films', Journal of Business Ethics 17(16), 1817–1823.

    Google Scholar 

  • Binns, P.: 1994, 'Ethical Business: Thinking Thoughts and Facilitating Processes', Business Ethics: A European Review 3(3), 174–179.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chryssides, G. D. and J. H. Kaler: 1993, An Introduction to Business Ethics, Chapman & Hall, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collier, J.: 1998, 'Theorising the Ethical Organisation', Business Ethics Quarterly 8(4), 621–654.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cowton, C. J. and T. W. Dunfee: 1995, 'Internationalising the Business Ethics Curriculum: A Survey', Journal of Business Ethics 14(5), 331–338.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coles, R.: 1989, The Call of Stories: Teaching and the Moral Imagination, Houghton Mifflin, Boston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coles, R.: 1995, 'The Disparity between Intellect and Character', The Chronicle of Higher Education, September 22, p. A68.

  • Cragg, W.: 1997, 'Teaching Business Ethics: The Role of Ethics in Business and Business Education', Journal of Business Ethics 16(3), 231–245.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cummins, J.: 1999, The Teaching of Business Ethics, Institute of Business Ethics, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • De George, R. T.: 1991, 'Will Success Spoil Business Ethics', in R. E. Freeman (ed.), Business Ethics: The State of the Art, Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 42–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frederick, W. C.: 1991, 'Commentary on Business Ethics as a Discipline: The Search for Legitimacy', in R. E. Freeman (ed.), Business Ethics: The State of the art, Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 57–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fudge, R. and J. L. Schlacter: 1999, 'Motivating Employees to Act Ethically: An Expectancy Theory Approach', in Journal of Business Ethics 18(3), 295–304.

    Google Scholar 

  • Furrow, D.: 1995, Against Theory: Continental and Ethical Challenges in Moral Philosophy, Routledge, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garaventa, E.: 1998, 'Drama: A Tool for Teaching Business Ethics', Business Ethics Quarterly 8(3), 535–545.

    Google Scholar 

  • Higginson, R. and G. Moore: 1994, 'Using a Computerised Game in Teaching Business Ethics', Business Ethics: A European Review 3(3), 160–164.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hosmer, L. T.: 1988, 'Adding Ethics to the Business Curriculum', Business Horizons (July-August), 9–15.

  • Jackson, J.: 1994, 'Coping with Scepticism: About the Philosopher's Role in Teaching Ethical Business', Business Ethics: A European Review 3(3), 171–173.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaler, J.: 2000. 'Positioning Business Ethics in Relation to Management and Political Philosophy', Journal of Business Ethics 19, 257–272.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kitson, A. and R. Campbell: 1996, The Ethical Organisation: Ethical Theory and Corporate Behaviour, Macmillan, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klein, E. R.: 1998, 'The One Necessary Condition for a Successful Business Ethics Course: the Teacher must be a Philosopher', Business Ethics Quarterly 8(3), 561–574.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacIntyre, A.: 1985, After Virtue: A Study in Moral Theory, Duckworth, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maclagan, P.: 1998, Management and Morality: A Developmental Perspective, Sage, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mahin, L.: 1998, 'Critical Thinking and Business Ethics', Business Communication Quarterly 61(3), 74–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mahoney, J.: 1990, Teaching Business Ethics in the UK, Europe and the USA: A Comparative Study, Athlone Press, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mahoney, J.: 1999, 'Cultivating Moral Courage in Business', in G. Enderle (ed.), International Business Ethics: Challenges and Approaches, University of Notre Dame Press, Notre Dame, pp. 249–259.

    Google Scholar 

  • McDonald, G. M. and G. D. Donleavy: 1995, 'Objections to the Teaching of Business Ethics', Journal of Business Ethics 14(11), 839–853.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nielsen, R. P.: 1998, 'Can Ethical Character be Stimulated and Enabled? An Action-Learning Approach to Teaching and Learning Organisation Ethics', Business Ethics Quarterly 8(3), 581–604.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paine, L. S.: 1991, 'Ethics as Character Development: Reflections on the Objective of Ethics Education', in R. E. Freeman (ed.), Business Ethics: The State of the Art, Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 67–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piper, T. R., M. C. Gentile and S. D. Parks: 1993, Can Ethics be Taught? Harvard Business School, Boston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rabouin, M.: 1997, 'Lyin' T(*)gers, and “Cares”, Oh My: The Case for Feminist Integration of Business Ethics', Journal of Business Ethics 16(3), 247–261.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rice, J. L. H.: 1994, 'Learning Ethical Business Through Role Play', Business Ethics: A European Review 3(3), 156–159.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaw, W. H.: 1996, 'Business Ethics Today: A Survey', Journal of Business Ethics 15, 489–500.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sommers, C. H.: 1993, 'Teaching the Virtues', Public Interest 111 (Spring), 3–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sorell, T.: 1998, 'Armchair Applied Philosophy and Business Ethics', in C. Cowton and R. Crisp (eds.), Business Ethics: Perspectives on the Practice of Theory, Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 79–95.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sorell, T. and J. Hendry: 1994, Business Ethics, Butterworth-Heinemann, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stiles, P., J. Amy and A. Lord: 1993, 'Teaching Business Ethics: An Open Learning Approach', Management Education and Development (Autumn), 246–261.

  • Trevino, L. K. and G. R. Weaver: 1994, 'Business ETHICS/BUSINESS Ethics: One Field or Two?', Business Ethics Quarterly 4(2), 113–128.

    Google Scholar 

  • Werhane, P.: 1994, 'Moral Character and Moral Reasoning', in T. J. Donaldson and R. E. Freeman (eds.), Business as a Humanity, Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 98–106.

    Google Scholar 

  • Werhane, P.: 1999, Moral Imagination and Management Decision-Making, Oxford University Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whetstone, J. T.: 1998, 'Teaching Ethics to Managers: Contemporary Problems and a Traditional Solution', in C. Cowton and R. Crisp (eds.), Business Ethics: Perspectives on the Practice of Theory, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 177–206.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rossouw, G. Three approaches to teaching business ethics. Teaching Business Ethics 6, 411–433 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021159310821

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021159310821

Navigation