Skip to main content
Log in

Prediction of the outcome of genetic testing in HNPCC kindreds using the revised Amsterdam criteria and immunohistochemistry

  • Published:
Familial Cancer Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background and aims: Hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC) may be caused by mutations in the mismatch repair (MMR) genes MLH1, MSH2 or MSH6. Family history (Amsterdam criteria) has traditionally been used to select patients for mutation testing. It has been demonstrated that germline mutations in the MMR genes are associated with lack of the corresponding gene product as assessed with immunohistochemistry (IHC) in tumour specimens. The aim of the study was to assess the value of the Amsterdam criteria II and IHC in predicting germline mutations.

Methods: Fifty-six families that were previously tested for MLH1, MSH2 and MSH6 mutations were selected for this study. All pedigrees were extended and verified and the families were scored according to the original (I) and the revised Amsterdam criteria (II). The probabilities for MLH1 and MSH2 mutations were calculated by logistic regression. In addition, all available tumour material from indexed family members was examined by IHC for the presence of the three gene products.

Results: Three out of seven (39%) families where the mutation could be identified complied with the Amsterdam criteria I, while all seven (100%) met the Amsterdam criteria II. All families carrying a MLH1 or MSH2 mutation had > 15% calculated probability of finding a mutation. Tumours from all seven mutation carriers lacked the immunohistochemical expression of the corresponding MMR gene.

Conclusion: The results indicate that the Amsterdam criteria II in combination with immunohistochemistry of the mismatch repair proteins in tumours may be a cost-effective approach to select families for mutation analysis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Vasen HFA, Mecklin J-P, Meera Khan P, Lynch HT. The International Collaborative Group on hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer (ICG-HNPCC). Dis Colon Rectum 1991; 34: 424-5.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Vasen HFA, Watson P, Mecklin J-P, Lynch HT. The International Collaborative Group on hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer (ICG-HNPCC). Gastroenterology 1999; 116: 453-6.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Strand M, Prolla T, Liskay M, Petes T. Destabilization of tracts of simple repetitive DNA in yeast by mutations affecting DNA mismatch repair. Nature 1993; 365: 274-6.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Fishel R, Lescoe MK, Rao MRS et al. The human mutator gene homolog MSH2 and its association with hereditary nonpolyposis colon cancer. Cell 1993; 75: 1027-38.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Leach FS, Nicolaides NC, Papadopoulos N et al. Mutations of a MutS homolog in hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer. Cell 1993; 75: 1215-35.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Bronner CE, Baker SM, Morrison PT et al. Mutations in the DNA mismatch repair gene homologue hMLH1 is associated with hereditary non-polyposis colon cancer. Nature 1994; 368: 258-61.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Papadopoulos N, Nicolaides NC, Wei Y et al. Mutation of a mutL homolog in hereditary colon cancer. Science 1994; 263: 1625-9.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Wijnen JT, Vasen HFA, Khan PM et al. Clinical findings with implications for genetic testing in families with clustering of colorectal cancer. N Eng J Med 1998; 339: 511-8.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Wijnen JT, de Leeuw W, Vasen HFA et al. Familial endometrial cancer in female carriers of MSH6 germline mutations. Nature Genet 1999; 23: 142-4.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Hemminki A, Peltomaki P, Mecklin JP et al. Loss of the wild type MLH1 gene is a feature of hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer. Nature Genet 1994; 8(4): 405-10.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Thibodeau SN, French AJ, Rosche PC et al. Altered expression of hMSH2 and hMLH1 in tumours with microsatellite instability and genetic alterations in mismatch repair genes. Cancer Res 1996; 56: 4836-40.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Wijnen JT, Khan PM, Vasen HFA et al. HNPCC families not complying with the Amsterdam criteria show extremely low frequency of mismatch repair gene mutations. Am J Hum Genet 1997; 61: 329-35.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Møller P. Genetic cancer: a challenge and a possible strategy. J Cancer Care 1993; 2: 94-9.

    Google Scholar 

  14. de Leeuw WJF, Dierssen JW, Vasen HFA et al. Prediction of a mismatch repair gene defect by microsatellite instability and immunohistochemical analysis in endometrial tumours from HNPCC patients. J Pathol 2000; 192: 328-35.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Hamilton SR, Aaltonen LA. Pathology and Genetics. Tumours of the Digestive System. WHO: 126-9.

  16. Chang DK, Ricciardiello L, Goel A et al. Steady-state regulation of the human DNA mismatch repair system. J Biol Chem 2000; 275(24): 18424-131.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Marra G, Iaccarino I, Lettieri T et al. Mismatch repair deficiency associated with overexpression of the MSH3 gene. Biochemistry 1998; 95(15): 8568-73.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Thibodeau SN, French AJ, Cunningham JM et al. Microsatellite instability in colorectal cancer: different mutator phenotypes and the principal involvement of hMLH1. Cancer Res 1998; 58: 1713-8.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Kuismanen SA, Homberg MT, Salovaara R et al. Genetic and epigenetic modification of MLH1 accounts for a major share of microsatellite-unstable colorectal cancers. Am J Pathol 2000; 156: 1773-9.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Esteler M, Levine R, Baylin SB et al. MLH1 promoter hypermethylation is associated with microsatellite instability phenotype in sporadic endometrial carcinomas. Oncogene 1998; 17: 2413-7.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Boland CR, Thibodeau SN, Hamilton SR et al. A National Cancer Institute Workshop on Microsatellite Instability for cancer detection and familial predisposition: development of international criteria for the determination of microsatellite instability in colorectal cancer. Cancer Res 58: 5248-57.

  22. Järvinen HJ, Aarnio M, Mustonen H et al. Controlled 15-year trial on screening for colorectal cancer in families with colorectal cancer. Gastroenterology 2000; 118(5): 829-34.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Stormorken, A.T., Müller, W., Lemkemeyer, B. et al. Prediction of the outcome of genetic testing in HNPCC kindreds using the revised Amsterdam criteria and immunohistochemistry. Familial Cancer 1, 169–173 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021151227983

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021151227983

Navigation