Skip to main content
Log in

Individual Dismissals in Europe and the United States: A Model on the Influence of the Legal Framework on Firing Costs

  • Published:
European Journal of Law and Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this article, we present a model of individual dismissals based on the workers' right to file a suit against their employer arguing that the dismissal is unjustified or unfair. The model is a standard pre-trial bargaining game between a firm and a worker. We study two cases: when the law states the severance pay for unfair dismissal (the European case), and when judges can decide freely on the compensation to be paid to the worker (the American case). The model provides some guidelines for Labour Law reforms. In the European case, a decrease in the severance pay for unfair dismissals fixed by law will decrease the severance pay offered by the firm, and only under some assumptions will decrease the expected firing cost and will increase the settlement probability. In addition, the transition from the European to the American case is likely to increase the probability of settlement (and to decrease it in the opposite case) with ambiguous effects on agreed severance pay and expected firing costs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bebchuk, L. A. (1984). “Litigation and Settlement under Imperfect Information.” Rand Journal of Economics. 15, 404–415.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bentolila, S. & Bertola, G. (1990). “Firing Costs and Labour Demand: How Bad is Euroesclerosis?” Review of Economic Studies. 57, 381–402.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bentolila, S. & Saint-Paul, G. (1994). “A Model of Labor Demand with Linear Adjustment Costs.” Labour Economics. 1, 303–326.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bertola, G. (1990). “Job Security, Employment and Wages.” European Economic Review. 34, 851–886.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bertola, G., Boeri, T., & Cazes, S. (1999). “Employment Protection and Labour Market Adjustment in OECD Countries: Evolving Institutions and Variable Enforcement.” Employment and Training Papers 48, International Labour Office (downloadable in: http://www.ilo.org/public/english/employment/strat/publ/etp48.htm).

  • Buechtemann, C. (ed.). (1993). Employment Security and Labor Market Behavior. Interdisciplinary Approaches and International Evidence, New York: ILR Press, Ithaca.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deakin, S. & Wilkinson, F. (1999). “The Management of Redundancies in Europe: The Case of Great Britain.” Labour. 13(1), 41–89.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dertouzos, J. N., Holland, E., & Ebener, P. (1988). “The Legal and Economic Consequences of Wrongful Termination.” Report nº R-3602-ICJ, Santa Monica, California: RAND Corp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Emerson, M. (1988). “Regulation or Deregulation of the Labour Market.” European Economic Review. 32, 775–817.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fabel, O., Welzmiller, S., & Chrubasik, P. (1999). “Severance Pay in Germany: A Contract Perspective.” In G. De Geest, J. Siegers, & R. Van den Bergh (eds.), Law and Economics and the Labour Market, United Kingdom, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, pp. 185–200.

  • Gould, J. (1973). “The Economics of Legal Conflicts.” Journal of Legal Studies. 2, 279–300.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gould, J. (1986). “The Idea of the Job as Property in Contemporary America: The Legal and Collective Bargaining Framework.” Brigham Young University Law Review. 4, 885–915.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grubb, D. & Wells, W. (1993). “Employment Regulation and Patterns ofWork in EC Countries.” OECD Economic Studies. 21, 7–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jimeno, J. F. & Toharia, L. (1994). “The Management of Redundancies in Spain: Economic Report,” Working Paper 94–04, FEDEA (Fundación de Estudios de Economía Aplicada), Madrid.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krueger, A. B. (1991). “The Evolution of Unjust Dismissal Legislation in the United States.” Industrial and Labor Relations Review. 44(4), 644–660.

    Google Scholar 

  • Landes, W. (1971). “An Economic Analysis of the Courts.” Journal of Law and Economics. 14, 61–107.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malo, M. A. (2000). “A Simple Model of Severance Pay Determination: The Case of Individual Dismissals in Spain.” Labour. 14(2), 269–290.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malo, M. A. (2001). “European Labour Law and Severance Pay Determination in Collective Redundancies.” European Journal of Law and Economics. 12(1), 73–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mumford, K. (1996). “Arbitration and ACAS in Britain: A Historical Perspective.” British Journal of Industrial Relations. 34(2), 287–306.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nickell, S. (1986). “Dynamic Models of Labour Demand.” In O. Ashenfelter & R. Layard (eds.), Handbook of Labor Economics, Vol. 1, North Holland, Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oi, W. (1962). “Labor as a Quasi-Fixed Factor.” Journal of Political Economy. 70, 538–555.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oyer, P. & Schaefer, S. (2000). “Layoffs and Litigation.” RAND Journal of Economics. 31(2), 345–358.

    Google Scholar 

  • P'ng, I. (1983). “Strategic Behavior in Suit, Settlement and Trial.” Bell Journal of Economics. 14, 539–550.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spier, K. (1992). “The Dynamics of Pretrial Negotiation.” Review of Economic Studies. 59, 93–108.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Malo, M.Á., Pérez, J. Individual Dismissals in Europe and the United States: A Model on the Influence of the Legal Framework on Firing Costs. European Journal of Law and Economics 15, 47–63 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021149824045

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021149824045

Navigation