Mechanisms of methane oxidation in the plant-soil system of rice were studied in a pot experiment using two cultivars (PSBRc-30 and IR72) at two growth stages (flowering and heading). Methane emission was measured by chambers, while methane oxidation was determined through propylene amendment as an alternative substrate to be propylene oxide (PPO) and acetylene as an inhibitor for methane oxidizing (methanotrophic) bacteria. Cell numbers (methanotrophic and methanogenic bacteria) were determined by the most probable number method. The cultivar PSBRc-30 consistently showed higher methane emission rates than IR72. Methane flux clearly decreased from flowering to heading stages in both cultivars. This observation was largely reflected by trends in the mechanisms involved: either methanogenic cell numbers or activities decreased with plant age while methanotrophic cell numbers or activities generally showed an increasing trend. The methanogenic population was in the order of 105 g−1 dry soil, while the population of methanotrophs ranged from 104 to nearly 106 g−1 dry soil. Methanotrophic activity followed the order; root (1.7–2.8 nL PPO g−1 DM h−1) > shoot (0.7–2.0) > soil (0–0.4) when the consumption of alternative substrate was related to dry matter. Derived from the estimated amounts of soil and plant biomass in the pot experiment, however, the soil generally accounted for more than 90% of the total methane oxidation. Within the plant segments, methane oxidation activities in the root exceeded those of the shoot by factor of approximately 10.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Subscribe to journal
Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Asakawa S & Hayano K (1995) Populations of methanogenic bacteria in paddy field soil under double cropping conditions (rice-wheat). Biol Fertil Soils 20: 113–117
Aulakh MS, Bodenbender J, Wassmann R & Rennenberg H (2000) Methane transport capacity of rice plants. II. Variations among different rice cultivars and relationship with morphological characteristics. Nutr Cycl Agroecosys 58: 367–375
Chidthaisong A, Inubushi K & Watanabe I (1996) Methanogenic characteristics of flooded rice soils in responce to glucose amendment. Soil Sci Plant Nutr 42: 645–649
Conrad R & Rothfuss F (1991) Methane oxidation in the soil surface layer of a flooded rice field and the effect of ammonium. Biol Fertil Soils 12: 28–32
Denier van der Gon HAC & van Breemen N (1993) Diffusion-controlled transport of methane from soil to atmosphere as mediated by rice plants. Biogeochemistry 21: 177–190
Hanson RS & Hanson TE (1996) Methanotrophic bacteria. Microbiol Rev 60: 439–471
Holzapfel-Pschorn A & Seiler W (1986) Methane emission during a cultivation period from an Italian rice paddy. J Geophys Res 91: 11803–11814
Inubushi K, Hori K, Matsumoto S, Umebayashi M & Wada H (1989) Methane emission from the flooded paddy soils to the atmosphere through rice plant. Jpn J Soil Sci Plant Nutr 60: 318–324
Inubushi K, Muramatsu Y & Umebayashi M (1992) Quantitative balance of methane production, oxidation and emission in paddy soil ecosystem, pp 91–94. UNESCO MAB Report, Tokyo
Inubushi K, Sugii H, Nishino S & Nishino E (2001) Effect of aquatic weeds on methane emission from submerged paddy soil, Am J Botany 88: 975–979
Kaku N, Ueki A, Ohbuchi K & Ueki K (1996) Analysis of methanogenic microbial ecosystem in paddy field soil — seasonal changes in the distribution of various bacteria and effects of organic matter application, Environ Sci 9: 249–261
Kaku N, Ueki A, Fujii H & Ueki K (2000) Methanogenic activities on rice roots and plant residue and their contributions to mathanogenesis in wetland rice field soil, Soil Biol Biochem 32: 2001–2010
Kimura M, Miura Y, Watanabe A, Katoh T & Haraguchi H (1991) Methane emission from paddy field (Part 1) Effect of fertilization, growth stage and midsummer drainage: Pot experiment. Environ Sci 4: 265–271
Sass RL, Fisher FM, Wang YB, Turner FT & Jund MF (1991) Methane emission from rice fields as influenced by solar radiation, temperature, and straw incorporation. Global Biogeochem Cycles 5: 335–350
Seiler W, Holzapfel-Pschorn A, Conrad R & Scharffe D (1984) Methane emission from rice paddies. J Atmos Chem 1: 241–268
Takeda K, Suzuki S, Neko K, Tomiyama Y, Fujita T, Matsuyama N & Watanabe I (1998) Enumeration and characteristics of methanotrophs in paddy soils and rice roots. Jpn J Soil Sci Plant Nutr 69: 570–575
Wang B, Neue HU & Samonte HP (1997) Effect of cultivar difference ('IR72', 'IR65598' and 'Dular') on methane emission. Agr Ecosys Environm 62: 31–40
Watanabe I, Hashimoto T & Shimoyama A (1997) Methane-oxidizing activities and methanotrophic populations associated with wetland rice plants. Biol Fertil Soils 24: 261–265
Watanabe I, Takada G, Hashimoto T & Inubushi K (1995) Evaluation of alternative substrates for determining methane-oxidizing activities and methanotrophic populations in soils. Biol Fertil Soils 20: 101–106
Yagi K & Minami K (1990) Effect of organic matter application on methane emission from some Japanese paddy fields. Soil Sci Plant Nutr 36: 599–610
About this article
Cite this article
Inubushi, K., Sugii, H., Watanabe, I. et al. Evaluation of methane oxidation in rice plant-soil system. Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems 64, 71–77 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021136431176
- acetylene inhibition
- methane oxidation
- new plant type
- wetland rice soil