Abstract
This article links spatialindicators of two demographic innovation wavesto historical and contemporary covariates ofboth a socio-economic and a cultural nature. The two waves of innovation correspond to theso-called “first” and “second” demographictransitions (FDT, SDT), respectively. Aconnection is made between the emergence ofspatial demographic patterns and A.J. Coale'sthree preconditions for innovation, i.e. “readiness”, “willingness” and “ability”(RWA-model) and to the influence of networks inshaping relatively stable regional subcultures. Since the RWA-model is of the “bottleneck” type, it is expected that the slowest moving ormost resistant condition will largely determinethe spatial outcome of the two demographictransitions. In the instances of Frenchdépartements, Belgian arrondissements andSwiss cantons, clear statistical associationsemerge between indicators of both FDT and SDTand cultural indicators. This suggests thatthe “willingness” condition, as reflected inregional subcultures, has been the dominantbottleneck in both waves of demographicinnovation. The Swiss evidence is, however,weaker than that for France and Belgium,despite the fact that, here too, associationsare in the expected direction.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Alwin, D., 1989. ‘Changes in qualities valued in children in the United States, 1964 to 1984’. Social Science Research 44(2): 1–42.
Alwin, D., 1992. ‘Attitude development in adulthood - the role of generational and life-cycle factors’, in D. Krebs and P. Schmidt (eds), The Relevance of Attitude Measurement in Sociology, pp. 57–89. Frankfurt/New York: Springer Verlag.
Bocquet-Appel, J.-P., 1996. ‘Spatial patterns: flows and barriers’, in J.-P. Bocquet-Appel, D. Courgeau and D. Pumain (eds), Spatial Analysis of Biodemographic Data, pp. 107–129. Paris: John Libbey Eurotext and Institut National d'Etudes Démographiques.
Bocquet-Appel, J.-P. and Jacobi, L., 1996. ‘Barriers to the spatial diffusion for the demographic transition in Western Europe’, in J.-P. Bocquet-Appel, D. Courgeau and D. Pumain (eds), Spatial Analysis of Biodemographic Data, pp. 117–129. Paris: John Libbey Eurotext and Institut National d'Etudes Démographiques.
Cliquet, R., 1992. ‘The second demographic transition: fact or fiction?’. Population Studies 23. Strasbourg: Council of Europe.
Coale, A. J., 1973. ‘The demographic transition reconsidered’, in International Union for the Scientific Study of Population (IUSSP) (ed), Proceedings of the International Population Conference 1973, Vol. 1, pp. 53–73. Liège: Editions Ordina.
Coale, A. J. and Treadway, R., 1986. ‘A summary of the changing distribution of overall fertility, marital fertility and of proportions married in the provinces of Europe’, in A. J. Coale and S. Watkins (eds), The Decline of Fertility in Europe, pp. 31–79. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.
Coale, A. J. and Watkins, S. C. (eds), 1986. The Decline of Fertility in Europe. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.
Etzioni, A., 1998. The Essential Communitarian Reader. Boulder/New York: Rowman and Little-field.
Freijka, T. and Calot, G., 2001. ‘Cohort reproductive patterns in low-fertility countries’. Population and Development Review 27(1): 103–132.
Hajnal, J., 1965. ‘European marriage patterns in perspective’, in D. Glass and D. Eversley (eds), Population in History, pp. 101–103. Chicago/London: Aldin Publishing Co.
Kohler, H.-P., 2001. Fertility and Social Interactions - An Economic Perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Kohn, M.L., 1977. Class and Conformity - A Study in Values. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Kytir, J., 1993. ‘Unehelich, vorehelich, ehelich: FamiliengrÚndung im Wandel. Eine empirische Analyse der Erstgeburten österreichischer Frauen 1950 bis 1990’. Demografische Informationen 1992-1993 (Institut für Demografie, Oesterreichische Akademie der Wissenschaften, Wien): 29–40.
Lesthaeghe, R., 1992. ‘Beyond economic reductionism: the transformation of the reproductive regimes in France and Belgium in the 18th and 19th centuries’, in C. Goldscheider (ed), Fertility Transitions, Family Structure and Population Policy, pp. 1–44. Brown University Studies in Population and Development, Westview Press, Boulder Co.
Lesthaeghe, R., 2001. ‘Postponement and recuperation - recent fertility trends and forecasts in six Western European countries’. Paper Presented at the IUSSP-seminar on Below Replacement Fertility. Tokyo, March 21-23, 40 p.
Lesthaeghe, R. and van de Kaa, D., 1986. ‘Twee demografische transities?’, in R. Lesthaeghe and D. van de Kaa (eds), Bevolking: groei en krimp, pp. 9–24. Deventer: Mens enMaatschappij, 1986 book supplement, Van Loghum Slaterus.
Lesthaeghe, R. and Moors, G., 2000. ‘Recent trends in fertility and household formation in the industrialised world’. Review of Population and Social Policy 9: 121–170.
Lesthaeghe, R. and Neels, K., 2000. ‘Maps, narratives, and demographic innovation’, in Dipartimento di Scienze Demografiche, Roma and Institut National d'Etudes Démographiques (eds), Démographie: analyse et synthèse, Vol. 3, pp. 83–111. Rome/Paris.
Lesthaeghe, R. and Vanderhoeft, C., 1999. ‘Une conceptualisation de transitions vers de nouvelles formes de comportement’, in D. Tabutin et al. (eds), Théories, paradigmes et courants explicatifs en démographie, pp. 279–306. Louvain-la-Neuve, Editions Academia-Bruylant and l'Harmattan. English version, 2001. ‘Ready, willing and able: a conceptualization of transitions to new behavioural forms’, in J. B. Casterline (ed), Diffusion Processes and Fertility Transition, pp. 240-264. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
Lesthaeghe, R. and Wilson, C., 1986. ‘Modes of production, secularization and the pace of fertility decline in Western Europe, 1870-1930’, in A. J. Coale and S. Watkins (eds), The Decline of Fertility in Europe, pp. 261–292. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.
Marsden, P. V., 1998. ‘Diffusion through social networks’. Workshop on Social Processes Underlying Fertility Change in Developing Countries. Committee on Population, US National Research Council, Washington, DC, January 29-30, 21 p.
Maslow, A., 1954. Motivation and Personality. New York: Harper and Row.
Montgomery, M. and Casterline, J., 1996. ‘Social learning, social influence, and the new models of fertility’. Population and Development Review 22(Supplement): 151–175.
Putnam, R., 2000. Bowling Alone. New York: Simon and Schuster.
van de Kaa, D. J., 1996. ‘Anchored narratives: the story and findings of half a century of research into the determinants of fertility’. Population Studies 50: 389–432.
Weir, D., 1982. Fertility Transition in Rural France, 1740-1829. California: PhD-dissertation, Dept. of Economics, Stanford University.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Lesthaeghe, R., Neels, K. From the First to the Second Demographic Transition: An Interpretation of the Spatial Continuity of Demographic Innovation in France, Belgium and Switzerland. European Journal of Population 18, 325–360 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021125800070
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021125800070