Skip to main content
Log in

On the Definition of Surface Potentials for Finite-Difference Operators

  • Published:
Journal of Scientific Computing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

For a class of linear constant-coefficient finite-difference operators of the second order, we introduce the concepts similar to those of conventional single- and double-layer potentials for differential operators. The discrete potentials are defined completely independently of any notion related to the approximation of the continuous potentials on the grid. We rather use an approach based on differentiating, and then inverting the differentiation of, a function with surface discontinuity of a particular kind, which is the most general way of introducing surface potentials in the theory of distributions. The resulting finite-difference “surface” potentials appear to be solutions of the corresponding system of linear algebraic equations driven by special source terms. The properties of the discrete potentials in many respects resemble those of the corresponding continuous potentials. Primarily, this pertains to the possibility of representing a given solution to the homogeneous equation on the domain as a variety of surface potentials with the density defined on the domain's boundary. At the same time, the discrete surface potentials can be interpreted as one specific realization of the generalized potentials of Calderon's type, and consequently, their approximation properties can be studied independently in the framework of the difference potentials method by Ryaben'kii. The motivation for introducing and analyzing the discrete surface potentials was provided by the problems of active shielding and control of sound, in which the aforementioned source terms that drive the potentials are interpreted as the acoustic control sources that cancel out the unwanted noise on a predetermined region of interest.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Calderon, A. P. (1963). Boundary-value problems for elliptic equations. In Proceedings of the Soviet-American Conference on Partial Differential Equations at Novosibirsk, Moscow, Fizmatgiz, pp. 303-304.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Kamenetskii, D. S. (1995). The Method of Difference Potentials: Certain Problems of Modified Calderon Potentials, Parts I–III, Technical Report 94–96, Keldysh Institute of Applied Mathematics, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, (In Russian).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Kamenetskii, D. S. (1998). Difference potentials and the parameterization of solutions of homogeneous difference equations. Comput. Math. Math. Phys. 38(11), 1754-1767.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Kamenetskii, D. S. (1999). Difference generalized Poincaré-Steklov operators and potentials with density from a space of jumps. Comput. Math. Math. Phys. 39(8), 1275-1282.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Kamenetskii, D. S. (2000). On one form of representing the difference potentials. Appl. Numer. Math. 33(1–4), 501-508.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Lončariâc, J., Ryaben'kii, V. S., and Tsynkov, S. V. (2001). Active shielding and control of noise. SIAM J. Appl. Math. 62(2), 563-596.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Lončariâc, J., and Tsynkov, S. V. (2002a). Quadratic optimization in the problems of active control of sound. Technical Report 2002-35, NASA/CR-2002-211939, ICASE, Hampton, VA, October 2002;-submitted to SIAM J. Appl. Math..

    Google Scholar 

  8. Lončariâc, J., and Tsynkov, S. V. (2002b). Optimization of acoustic source strength in the problems of active noise control. SIAM J. Appl. Math., to appear;-also Technical Report 2002-11, NASA/CR-2002-211636, ICASE, Hampton, VA, May 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Nelson, P. A., and Elliot, S. J. (1999). Active Control of Sound, San Diego, Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Proskurowski, W., and Widlund, O. (1976). On the numerical solution of Helmholtz's equation by the capacitance matrix method. Math. Comp. 30, 433-468.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Ryaben'kii, V. S. (1971). The method of internal boundary conditions in the theory of boundary value difference problems. Russian Math. Surveys 26, 117-176

    Google Scholar 

  12. Ryaben'kii, V. S. (1985). Boundary equations with projections. Russian Math. Surveys 40, 147-183.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Ryaben'kii, V. S. (1987). Difference Potentials Method for Some Problems of Continuous Media Mechanics, Moscow, Nauka. In Russian.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Ryaben'kii, V. S. (1995). A difference screening problem, Funct. Anal. Appl. 29, 70-71.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Ryaben'kii, V. S. (1998). A Nonlinear Difference Shielding Problem. In Bach, M., Constanda, C., Hsiao, G. C., Sändig, AM., and Werner, P. (eds.), Analysis, Numerics, and Applications of Differential and Integral Equations, Longman, Harlow, pp. 179-182

    Google Scholar 

  16. Ryaben'kii, V. S. (2002). Method of Difference Potentials and Its Applications, Berlin, Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Seeley, R. T. (1966). Singular integrals and boundary value problems. Amer. J. Math. 88, 781-809.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Tikhonov, A. N., and Samarskii, A. A. (1963). Equations of Mathematical Physics, Oxford, Pergamon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Veizman, R. I., and Ryaben'kii, V. S. (1997a). Difference problems of screening and simulation. Dokl. Akad. Nauk 354, 151-154.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Veizman, R. I., and Ryaben'kii, V. S. (1997b). Difference simulation problems. In Transactions of Moscow Mathematics Society, pp. 239-248.

  21. Vladimirov, V. S. (1971). Equations of Mathematical Physics, New-York, Dekker-

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Tsynkov, S.V. On the Definition of Surface Potentials for Finite-Difference Operators. Journal of Scientific Computing 18, 155–189 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021111713715

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021111713715

Navigation