Advertisement

Environmental Biology of Fishes

, Volume 65, Issue 4, pp 469–472 | Cite as

Dummy Egg Production by Female Cardinalfish to Deceive Cannibalistic Males: Oogenesis without Vitellogenesis

  • Gen Kume
  • Atsuko Yamaguchi
  • Ichiro Aoki
Article

Abstract

Filial cannibalism occurs in a variety of taxa, especially in fish exhibit paternal care. In the Apogonidae, males mouthbrood a cohesive mass of eggs received from a single female, although the males frequently eat the entire brood. It has been recognized that a primary factor concerning entire brood cannibalism is the brood size produced by females, as the parent eats a small egg mass so long as the reproductive return does not exceed the cost of providing care. In Apogon lineatus, approximately 18% of each brood was occupied by abnormal eggs lacking yolk, which were hydrated without the vitellogenesis phase and eventually ovulated with other normal eggs as a single egg mass. By not providing yolk to some eggs within the brood, A. lineatus females may succeed in producing an apparently large brood, reducing the likelihood of entire brood cannibalism by males.

filial cannibalism oocyte hydration paternal mouthbrooder Apogonidae 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References cited

  1. Belles-Isles, J.-C. & G.J. FitzGerald. 1991. Filial cannibalism in sticklebacks: a reproductive management strategy? Ethol. Ecol. Evol. 3: 49–62.Google Scholar
  2. Cerdá, J.L., T.R. Petrino & R.A. Wallace. 1993. Functional heterologous gap junctions in Fundulus ovarian follicles maintain meiotic arrest and permit hydration during oocyte maturation. Dev. Biol. 160: 228–235.Google Scholar
  3. Craik, J.C.A. & S.M. Harvey. 1984. Biochemical changes occurring during final maturation of eggs of some marine and freshwater teleosts. J. Fish Biol. 24: 599–610.Google Scholar
  4. DeMartini, E.E. 1987. Paternal defence, cannibalism and polygammy: factors influencing the reproductive success of painted greeling (Pisces: Hexagrammidae). Anim. Behav. 35: 1145–1158.Google Scholar
  5. FitzGerald, G.J. 1992. Filial cannibalism in fishes: why do parents eat their offspring? Trends Ecol. Evol. 7: 7–10.Google Scholar
  6. Fulton, T.W. 1898. On the growth and maturation of the ovarian eggs of teleostean fishes. Rep. Fisheries Board Scotl. 3: 88–134.Google Scholar
  7. Greeley, M.S. Jr., D.R. Calder & R.A. Wallace. 1986. Changes in teleost yolk proteins during oocyte maturation: correlation of yolk proteolysis with oocyte hydration. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. 84B: 1–9.Google Scholar
  8. Greeley, M.S. Jr., H. Hols & R.A. Wallace. 1991. Changes in size, hydration and low molecular weight osmotic effectors during meiotic maturation of Fundulus oocytes in vivo. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. 100A: 639–647.Google Scholar
  9. Hayashi, M. 1993. Apogonidae. pp. 655–681. In: T. Nakabo (ed.) Fishes of Japan with Pictorial Keys to the Species, Tokai University Press, Tokyo (in Japanese).Google Scholar
  10. Hirose, K. 1976. Endocrine control of ovulation in medaka (Oryzias latipes) and ayu (Plecoglossus altivelis). J. Fish. Res. Board Can. 33: 989–994.Google Scholar
  11. Kraak, S.B.M. 1996. Female preference and filial cannibalism in Aidablennius sphynx (Teleostei, Blenniidae); a combined field and laboratory study. Behav. Proc. 36: 85–98.Google Scholar
  12. Kume, G., A. Yamaguchi & T. Taniuchi. 2000. Filial cannibalism in the paternal mouthbrooding cardinalfish Apogon lineatus: egg production by the female as the nutrition source for the mouthbrooding male. Env. Biol. Fish. 58: 231–234.Google Scholar
  13. Kuwamura, T. 1985. Social and reproductive behavior of three mouthbrooding cardinalfishes, Apogon doederleini, A. niger, and A. notatus. Env. Biol. Fish. 13: 17–24.Google Scholar
  14. Kvarnemo, C., O. Svensson & E. Forsgren. 1998. Parental behavior in relation to food availability in the common goby. Anim. Behav. 56: 1285–1290.Google Scholar
  15. LaFleur, G.J. Jr. & P. Thomas. 1991. Evidence for a role of Na+, K+-ATPase in the hydration of Atlantic croaker and spotted seatrout oocytes during final maturation. J. Exp. Zool. 258: 126–136.Google Scholar
  16. Lavery, R.J. & M.H.A. Keenleyside. 1990. Filial cannibalism in the biparental fish Cichlasoma nigrofasciatum (Pisces: Cichlidae) in response to early brood reductions. Ethology 86: 326–338.Google Scholar
  17. Lindström, K. 1998. Effects of costs and benefits of brood care on filial cannibalism in the sand goby. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 42: 101–106.Google Scholar
  18. Lindström, K. 2000. The evolution of filial cannibalism and female mate choice strategies as resolutions to sexual conflict in fish. Evolution 54: 617–627.Google Scholar
  19. Lindström, K. & R.C. Sargent. 1997. Food access, brood size and filial cannibalism in the fantail darter, Etheostoma flabellare. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 40: 107–110.Google Scholar
  20. Marconato, A., A. Bisazza & M. Fabris. 1993. The cost of parental care and egg cannibalism in the river bullhead, Cottus gobio L. (Pisces, Cottidae). Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 32: 229–237.Google Scholar
  21. Matsubara, T. & Y. Koya. 1997. Course of proteolytic cleavage in three classes of yolk proteins during oocyte maturation in barfin flounder Verasper moseri, a marine teleost spawning pelagic eggs. J. Exp. Zool. 278: 189–200.Google Scholar
  22. McPherson, R., M.S. Greeley Jr. & R.A. Wallace. 1989. The influence of yolk protein proteolysis on hydration in the oocytes of Fundulus heteroclitus. Dev. Growth Differ. 31: 475–483.Google Scholar
  23. Ochi, H. 1985. Termination of paternal care due to small clutch size in the temperate damselfish, Chromis notata. Env. Biol. Fish. 12: 155–160.Google Scholar
  24. Okuda, N. & Y. Yanagisawa. 1996a. Filial cannibalism by mouthbrooding males of the cardinal fish, Apogon doederleini, in relation to their physical condition. Env. Biol. Fish. 45: 397–404.Google Scholar
  25. Okuda, N. & Y. Yanagisawa. 1996b. Filial cannibalism in a paternal mouthbrooding fish in relation to mate availability. Anim. Behav. 52: 307–314.Google Scholar
  26. Okuda, N. 2000. Interspecific differences in male cannibalistic behavior between two sympatric cardinalfishes (Pisces: Apogonidae). J. Ethol. 18: 5–10.Google Scholar
  27. Oshiro, T. & T. Hibiya. 1981. Relationship of yolk globules fusion to oocyte water absorption in the plaice, Limanda yokohamae, during meiotic maturation. Bull. Japan. Soc. Sci. Fish. 47: 1123–1130.Google Scholar
  28. Petersen, C.W. 1990. The occurrence and dynamics of clutch loss and filial cannibalism in two Caribbean damselfishes. J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 135: 117–133.Google Scholar
  29. Petersen, C.W. & K. Marchetti. 1989. Filial cannibalism in the cortez damselfish Stegastes rectifraenum. Evolution 43: 158–168.Google Scholar
  30. Rohwer, S. 1978. Parental cannibalism of offspring and egg raiding as a courtship strategy. Amer. Nat. 112: 429–440.Google Scholar
  31. Sargent, R.C. 1992. Ecology of filial cannibalism in fish: theoretical perspectives. pp. 38–62. In: M.A. Elgar & B.J. Crespi (ed.) Cannibalism: Ecology and Evolution Among Diverse Taxa, Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
  32. Sargent, R.C. 1997. Parental care. pp. 292–315. In: J.J. Godin (ed.) Behavioural Ecology of Teleost Fishes, Oxford University Press, New York.Google Scholar
  33. Vinyoles, D., I.M. Côté & A. Sostoa. 1999. Egg cannibalism in river blennies: the role of natural prey availability. J. Fish Biol. 55: 1223–1232.Google Scholar
  34. Wallace R.A. 1985. Vitellogenesis and oocyte growth in nonmammalian vertebrates. pp. 127–177. In: L.W. Browder (ed.) Developmental Biology, Vol. 1, Plenum Press, New York.Google Scholar
  35. Wallace, R.A., M.S. Jr. Greeley & R. McPherson. 1992. Analytical and experimental studies on the relationship between Na+, K+, and water uptake during volume increases associated with Fundulus oocyte maturation in vitro. J. Comp. Physiol. B. 162: 241–248.Google Scholar
  36. Wallace, R.A. & K. Selman. 1985. Major protein changes during vitellogenesis and maturation of Fundulus oocytes. Dev. Biol. 110: 492–498.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  • Gen Kume
    • 1
  • Atsuko Yamaguchi
    • 2
  • Ichiro Aoki
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Aquatic Bioscience, Graduate School of Agricultural and Life SciencesThe University of Tokyo, Yayoi, BunkyoTokyoJapan
  2. 2.Faculty of FisheriesNagasaki University, BunkyoNagasakiJapan

Personalised recommendations