Abstract
Much of the negotiation literature emphasizes dispute resolution process, seemingly based on the assumption that resolution is indeed possible in a rational environment. The author outlines the history of transformations in social and political thought that have led to this shared assumption. However, the rationality assumption is seriously challenged in the contemporary era by terrorists and others who predicate their actions on a moral certitude that justifies their actions, no matter what the costs. Interveners perhaps should place more emphasis on changing the environment in which disputes occur, so that resolution is at least a possibility.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
Herman, A. 2001. How the Scots invented the modern world: The true story of how Western Europe's poorest nation created our world and everything in it. New York: Crown Business.
Hirschman, A.O. 1977. The passions and the interests: Political arguments for capitalism before its triumph. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
About this article
Cite this article
Dingwall, R. What Makes Conflict Resolution Possible?. Negotiation Journal 18, 321–326 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021093920794
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021093920794