Skip to main content
Log in

The Next Step: Research on How Dispute System Design Affects Function

  • Published:
Negotiation Journal

Abstract

Despite claims that ADR offers "better" solutions than traditional approaches (such as the courts), the field of dispute resolution has trouble proving its case. The reason is that we lack baseline data on the effectiveness of both traditional and nontraditional dispute resolution methods. Practitioners and researchers of dispute resolution should work together and in collaboration with public and private sector institutions to incorporate systemized data collection and evaluation into ADR practice. The growing subfield of dispute system design offers particularly rich ground for such collaboration between the research and practice communities.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Bingham, L. B. and Pitts D. W. 2002. Highlights of mediation at work: Studies of the national REDRESS® evaluation project. Negotiation Journal 18(2): 135-146.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henry, J. F. 2000. Some reflections on ADR. Journal of Dispute Resolution 2000: 63-70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn, T. 1970. The structure of scientific revolutions. 2d ed. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McEwen, C. A. 1999. Toward a program-based ADR research agenda. Negotiation Journal 15: 325-338.

    Google Scholar 

  • O'Leary, R. and L.B. Bingham, eds. Forthcoming. Evaluating environmental and public policy conflict resolution programs and policies. Washington: Resources for the Future Press.

  • Sander, F. E. A. 2000. The future of ADR. Journal of Dispute Resolution 2000: 3-10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ury, W.L., J.M. Brett, and S.B. Goldberg. 1988. Getting disputes resolved: Designing systems to cut the cost of confict. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Welsh, N. 2001. All in the family: Darwin and the evolution of mediation. Dispute Resolution Magazine 7: 20-24.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

About this article

Cite this article

Bingham, L.B. The Next Step: Research on How Dispute System Design Affects Function. Negotiation Journal 18, 375–379 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021062408499

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021062408499

Keywords

Navigation