Advertisement

Hydrobiologia

, Volume 477, Issue 1–3, pp 171–179 | Cite as

Nocturnal increases in the use of near-surface water by pond animals

  • Stephanie E. Hampton
  • Nick A. Friedenberg
Article

Abstract

We assessed diel animal habitat use in three shallow ponds, using unbaited funnel traps, a large column sampler, and sweep net collections in the upper stratum (0–0.3 m) of littoral and open habitats. In all three ponds, more animals were caught at night than during the day, indicating that use of near-surface waters was greatest at night, particularly in the fishless ponds. All methods yielded similar patterns. Our results demonstrate that nocturnal observations of pond animals are necessary to describe their ecology, even in fishless ponds where diel differences in habitat use or behavior might not be anticipated.

diel periodicity habitat use macroinvertebrates aquatic insects macrophytes sampling techniques 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Aiken, R. B. & R. E. Roughley, 1985. An effective trapping and marking method for aquatic beetles. Proc. Acad. nat. Sci. Philad. 137: 5–7.Google Scholar
  2. Allison, E. H., K. Irvine, A. B. Thompson & B. P. Ngatunga, 1996. Diets and food consumption rates of pelagic fish in Lake Malawi, Africa. Freshwat. Biol. 35: 489–515.Google Scholar
  3. Birch, M. W., 1963. An algorithm for the logarithmic series distribution. Biometrics 19: 651–652.Google Scholar
  4. Bohl, E., 1980. Diel pattern of pelagic distribution and feeding in planktivorous fish. Oecologia 44: 368–375.Google Scholar
  5. Brittain, J. E. & T. J. Eikeland, 1988. Invertebrate drift-a review. Hydrobiologia 166: 77–93.Google Scholar
  6. Caley, M. J. & J. St. John, 1996. Refuge availability structures assemblages of tropical reef fishes. J. anim. Ecol. 65: 414–428.Google Scholar
  7. Cook, E. F., 1956. The Nearctic Chaoborinae (Diptera: Culicidae). University of Minnesota Agricultural Experiment Station Technical Bulletin 218: 1–102.Google Scholar
  8. Cowan, C. A. & B. L. Peckarsky, 1994. Diel feeding and positioning periodicity of a grazing mayfly in a trout stream and a fishless stream. Can. J. Fish. aquat. Sci. 51: 450–459.Google Scholar
  9. Cox, R. R. Jr., M. A. Hanson, C. C. Roy, N. H. Euliss Jr., D. H. Johnson & M. G. Butler, 1998. Mallard duckling growth and survival in relation to aquatic invertebrates. J. Wildlife Manage. 62(1): 124–133.Google Scholar
  10. Dean, R. L. & J. H. Connell, 1987a. Marine invertebrates in an algal succession. II. Tests of hypotheses to explain changes in diversity with succession. J. exp. mar. Biol. Ecol. 109: 217–247.Google Scholar
  11. Dean, R. L. & J. H. Connell, 1987b. Marine invertebrates in an algal succession. III. Mechanisms linking habitat complexity with diversity. J. exp. mar. Biol. Ecol. 109: 217–247.Google Scholar
  12. Dini, M. L. & S. R. Carpenter, 1992. Fish predators, food availability and diel vertical migration in Daphnia. J. Plankton Res. 14(3): 359–377.Google Scholar
  13. Fisher, R. A., A. S. Corbet & C. B. Williams, 1943. The relation between the number of species and the number of individuals in a random sample of an animal population. J. anim. Ecol. 12: 42–58.Google Scholar
  14. Flecker, A. S., 1992. Fish predation and the evolution of invertebrate drift periodicity: evidence from neotropical streams. Ecology 73(2): 438–448.Google Scholar
  15. Gilbert, J. J., C. W. Burns & C. C. Gilbert, 1999. Summer distribution patterns of the backswimmer, Anisops wakefieldi (Hemiptera: Notonectidae), in a New Zealand pond. New Zealand J. mar. Freshwat. Res. 33: 661–672.Google Scholar
  16. Hall, D. J., E. E. Werner, J. F. Gilliam, G. G. Mittelbach, D. Howard & C. G. Doner, 1979. Diel foraging behavior and prey selection in the Golden Shiner (Notemigonus crysoleucas). J. Fish. Res. Bd Can. 36: 1029–1039.Google Scholar
  17. Haney, J. F., 1988. Diel patterns of zooplankton behavior. Bull. mar. Sci. 43(3): 583–603.Google Scholar
  18. Hilsenhoff, W. L., 1987. Effectiveness of bottle traps for collecting Dytiscidae (Coleoptera). The Coleopterists Bulletin 41(4): 377–380.Google Scholar
  19. Holomuzki, J. R. & J. D. Hoyle, 2000. Effect of predatory fish presence and habitat use and diel movement of the stream amphipod, Gammarus minus. Freshwat. Biol. 24: 509–517.Google Scholar
  20. Hungerford, H. B., 1933. The genus Notonecta of the world (Notonectidae-Hemiptera). University of Kansas Science Bulletin 21: 5–195.Google Scholar
  21. James, M. R., M. Weatherhead, C. Stangor & E. Graynoth, 1998. Macroinvertebrate distribution in the littoral zone of Lake Coleridge, South Island, New Zealand-effects of habitat stability, wind exposure, and macrophytes. New Zealand J. mar. Freshwat. Res. 32: 287–305.Google Scholar
  22. Johnson, J. H., 1995. Diel feeding ecology of three species of aquatic insects. J. Freshwat. Ecol. 10(2): 183–188.Google Scholar
  23. Johnson, S. L. & A. P. Covich, 2000. The importance of night-time observations for determining habitat preferences of stream biota. Regulated Rivers: Research and Management 16: 91–99.Google Scholar
  24. Lampert, W. & B. E. Taylor, 1985. Zooplankton grazing in a eutrophic lake: implications of diel vertical migration. Ecology 66(1): 68–82.Google Scholar
  25. Levy, D. A., 1990. Reciprocal diel vertical migration behavior in planktivores and zooplankton in British Colombia lakes. Can. J. Fish. aquat. Sci. 47: 1755–1764.Google Scholar
  26. Marchant, R., 1982. Seasonal variation in the macroinvertebrate fauna of billabongs along Magela Creek, Northern Territory. Aust. J. mar. Freshwat. Res. 33: 329–342.Google Scholar
  27. Martin-Smith, K. M., 1993. Abundance of mobile epifauna: the role of habitat complexity and predation by fishes. J. exp. mar. Biol. Ecol. 174: 243–260.Google Scholar
  28. Merritt, R. W. & K. W. Cummins, 1984. An Introduction to the Aquatic Insects of North America. Kendall/Hunt Publishing Co. Dubuque, IA: 722 pp.Google Scholar
  29. Neill, W. E., 1990. Induced vertical migration in copepods as a defence against invertebrate predation. Nature 345: 524–526.Google Scholar
  30. O'Connor, N. A., 1991. The effects of habitat complexity on the macroinvertebrates colonising wood substrates in a lowland stream. Oecologia 85: 504–512.Google Scholar
  31. Ó Hare, M. T. & K. J. Murphy, 1999. Invertebrate hydraulic microhabitat and community structure in Callitriche stagnalis Scop. patches. Hydrobiologia 415: 169–176.Google Scholar
  32. Peckarsky, B. L., P. R. Fraissinet, M. A. Penton & D. J. Conklin Jr., 1990. Freshwater Macroinvertebrates of Northeastern North America. Cornell University Press, Ithaca, New York: 442 pp.Google Scholar
  33. Peckarsky, B. L., 1996. Alternative predator avoidance syndromes of stream-dwelling mayfly larvae. Ecology 77(6): 1888–1905.Google Scholar
  34. Pennak, R.W., 1944. Diurnal movements of zooplankton organisms in some Colorado mountain lakes. Ecology 25(4): 387–403.Google Scholar
  35. Pierce, C. L., 1988. Predator avoidance, microhabitat shift, and risksensitive foraging in larval dragonflies. Oecologia 77: 81–90.Google Scholar
  36. Piet, G. J. & W. A. H. P. Guruge, 1997. Diel variation in feeding and vertical distribution of ten co-occurring fish species: consequences for resource partitioning. Envir. Biol. Fishes 50: 293–307.Google Scholar
  37. Resh, V. H. & D. M. Rosenberg, 1989. Spatial-temporal variability and the study of aquatic insects. The Canadian Entomologist 121: 941–963.Google Scholar
  38. Streams, F. A., 1992. Age-dependent foraging depths of two species of Notonecta (Heteroptera: Notonectidae) breeding together in a small pond. Aquatic Insects 14(3): 183–191.Google Scholar
  39. Streams, F. A. & T. P. Shubeck, 1982. Spatial structure and intraspecific interactions in Notonecta populations. Envir. Ent. 11(3): 652–659.Google Scholar
  40. Teragushi, M. & T. G. Northcote, 1966. Vertical distribution and migration of Chaoborus flavicans larvae in Corbett Lake, British Columbia. Limnol. Oceanogr. 11(2): 164–176.Google Scholar
  41. Tokeshi, M., 1993. Species abundance patterns and community structure. Adv. ecol. Res. 24: 111–186.Google Scholar
  42. Truxal, F. S., 1953. A revision of the genus Buenoa (Hemiptera Notonectidae). University of Kansas Science Bulletin 35: 1351–1521.Google Scholar
  43. Van Buskirk, J., 1992. Competition, cannibalism, and size class dominance in a dragonfly. Oikos 65: 455–464.Google Scholar
  44. Voss, S. & H. Mumm, 1999. Where to stay by night and day: Size-specific and seasonal differences in horizontal and vertical distribution of Chaoborus flavicans larvae. Freshwat. Biol. 42: 201–213.Google Scholar
  45. Waters, T. F., 1962. Diurnal periodicity in the drift of stream invertebrates. Ecology 43(2): 316–320.Google Scholar
  46. Wood, K. G., 1956. Ecology of Chaoborus (Diptera: Culicidae) in an Ontario lake. Ecology 37(4): 639–643.Google Scholar
  47. Zaret, T. M. & J. S. Suffern, 1976. Vertical migration in zooplankton as a predator avoidance mechanism. Limnol. Oceanogr. 21: 804–813.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  • Stephanie E. Hampton
    • 1
  • Nick A. Friedenberg
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Biological SciencesDartmouth CollegeHanoverU.S.A.

Personalised recommendations