Skip to main content
Log in

Correspondences and Comparisons in International and Domestic Conflict Resolution

  • Published:
Negotiation Journal

Abstract

The eclectic “field” of conflict resolution is characterized by a constant interplay between practice and theory (to say nothing about varying interpretations of what practice and theory actually are or should be). The author raises a number of questions about how to develop and test theory; the significant role of context in theory generation; and a variety of themes or issues that can be explored to provide scholarly synthesis as well as guidance for the practitioner, in both domestic and international conflict situations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Elster, J. 1995. Strategic uses of argument. In Barriers to conflict resolution, edited by K. Arrow et al. New York: W.W. Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ignatieff, M. 1993. Blood and belonging: Journeys into the new nationalism. New York: Farrar, Straus, & Giroux.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malley, R. and H. Agha. 2001. Camp David: The tragedy of errors. New York Review of Books 48 (8 August 2001): 59-65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Menkel-Meadow, C. 2000. When winning isn't everything: The Lawyer as problem solver. Hofstra Law Review 28: 905-923.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 2001a. Negotiating with lawyers, men and things: The contextual approach still matters. Negotiation Journal 17: 257-293.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 2001b. And now a word about secular humanism: Spirituality, and the practice of justice and conflict resolution. Fordham Urban Law Journal 28: 1073-1087.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, G. J. 1999. Making peace. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

About this article

Cite this article

Menkel-Meadow, C. Correspondences and Comparisons in International and Domestic Conflict Resolution. Negotiation Journal 18, 363–369 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021058307590

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021058307590

Keywords

Navigation